Yaşam Boyu Gelişimde Motivasyon Kuramı Çerçevesinde Kontrol Stratejilerinin İncelenmesi

Öz

Araştırmanın temel amacı Yaşam Boyu Gelişimde Motivasyon Kuramı (Heckhausen, Wrosch ve Schulz, 2010) çerçevesinde, genç bireylerin belirledikleri bir hedefe ulaşma sürecinde başvurdukları kontrol stratejilerinin neler olduğunu incelemektir. Araştırmanın örneklemini yaşları 18 ile 30 arasında değişen 396 katılımcı oluşturmaktadır. Katılımcıların 214’ü kadın (%54), 182’si (%46) erkektir. Yaş ortalaması ise 23.92’dir (SS = 3.80). Katılımcılar en az lise mezunudur. Katılımcılardan ilk olarak lise veya üniversite yıllarında belirlemiş oldukları hedefi hatırlamaları ve bu hedefe ulaşma sürecinde bir engel ya da başarısızlıkla karşılaşmaları durumunda başvurdukları kontrol stratejilerinin neler olduğunu belirtmeleri istenmiştir. Katılımcılara ayrıca Optimizasyon ve Kontrol Stratejileri Ölçeği uygulanmıştır. Çalışma kapsamında belirlenen hedefle ilgili olarak yakın çevredeki bireylerden ne ölçüde destek algılandığı da incelenmiştir. Yaşam Boyu Gelişimde Motivasyon Kuramı (Heckhausen ve ark., 2010) çerçevesinde yürütülen niteliksel veri analizi sonucunda verilen yanıtların önemli bir çoğunluğu seçici birincil kontrol ve ödünleyici birincil kontrol stratejileri kapsamında sınıflandırılmıştır. Bu iki stratejiyi seçici ikincil kontrol stratejisi izlemiştir. Katılımcılar tarafından en az başvurulan kontrol stratejisinin ise ödünleyici ikincil kontrol stratejisi olduğu görülmüştür. Tek Faktörde Tekrar Ölçümlü ANOVA sonuçları da ödünleyici ikincil kontrol stratejisinin diğer kontrol stratejilerine kıyasla katılımcılar tarafından daha az kullanıldığına işaret etmektedir. Ayrıca bireylerin hedefe ulaşma sürecinde en çok annelerinden destek algıladıkları görülmüştür. Çalışma kapsamında zamana ve çabaya yatırım yapma, tekrardan deneme, mücadele etme, yeni yöntemlere başvurma, diğer insanlardan yardım ve tavsiye isteme gibi stratejilerin katılımcılar tarafından daha çok kullanıldığı ortaya konulmuştur. Elde edilen bu yöndeki sonuçlar, genç bireylerin belirledikleri hedeflere ulaşma sürecinde bir engel ya da başarısızlıkla karşılaşmaları durumunda büyük ölçüde çaba harcamaya devam ettiklerine işaret etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Gelişimsel hedefler,Yaşam Boyu Gelişimde Motivasyon Kuramı,kontrol stratejileri,lise veya üniversite yılları

The Investigation of Control Strategies within the frame of Motivational Theory of Life-Span Development

Öz

The main purpose of this study is to investigate the control strategies used by individuals in the process of reaching a goal within the frame of the motivational theory of life-span development (Heckhausen, Wrosch, & Schulz, 2010). The sample consisted of 396 participants aged between 18 and 30 years. 214 (54%) of the participants were women and 182 (46%) of them were men. The mean age of the participants was 23.92 years (SD = 3.80). All of the participants were at least high school graduates. The participants were asked to remember the goal they had set for themselves during high school and university years, and to indicate what control strategies they applied if they had encountered an obstacle or a failure in the process of reaching this goal. The Optimization in Primary and Secondary Control Scale was also administered to the participants. In this study, we also examined the perceived support from significant others related to the goal. Qualitative data analysis conducted in the frame of motivational theory of life-span development (Heckhausen et al., 2010) indicated that a significant majority of respondents’ answers could be classified as selective primary control and compensatory primary control strategies. These two strategies were followed by selective secondary control. The control strategy which was least used by the participants, was the compensatory secondary control. The results of the One-Way Repeated Measures of ANOVA also revealed that the compensatory secondary control was less frequently used compared to other control strategies. Our findings also showed that participants perceived support mostly from their mothers. The study indicated that participants used strategies such as investing time and effort, trying again and struggling, using new methods, and seeking help or advice from other people more than other strategies. The results also revealed that young individuals who encounter obstacles or failures in the process of reaching their goals mostly continue to strive to achieve their goals.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Developmental goals,motivational theory of life-span development,control strategies,high school or university years

Kaynakça

1. Baltes, P. B. ve Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. B. Baltes ve M. M. Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1-34). New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Boudreaux, M. J. ve Ozer, D. J. (2013). Goal conflict, goal striving, and psychological well-being. Motivation and Emotion, 37, 433-443.
3. Brandtstädter, J. ve Renner, G. (1990). Tenacious goal pursuit and flexible goal adjustment: Explication and age-related analysis of assimilative and accommodative strategies of coping. Psychology and Aging, 5(1), 58-67.
4. Chang, E. S., Chen, C., Greenberger, E., Dooley, D. ve Heckhausen, J. (2006). What do they want in life? The life goals of a multi-ethnic, multi-generational sample of high school seniors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(3), 302-313.
5. Dietrich, J., Parker, P. ve Salmela-Aro, K. (2013). Phase-adequate engagement at the post-school transition. Developmental Psychology, 48(6), 1575-1593.
6. Dunne, E., Wrosch, C. ve Miller, G. E. (2011). Goal disengagement, functional disability, and depressive symptoms in old age. Health Psychology, 30(6), 763-770.
7. Eryılmaz, A. (2012). Pozitif psikoterapi bağlamında geliştirilen ergenler için amaçları genişletme grup rehberliği programının etkililiğinin incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 37(164), 3-19.
8. Freund, A. M. ve Baltes, P. B. (2002). Life-management strategies of selection, optimization and compensation: Measurement by self-report and construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 642-662.

9. Gould, S. J. (1999). A critique of Heckhausen and Schulz’s (1995) life-span theory of control from a cross-cultural perspective. Psychological Review, 106, 597-604.
10. Haase, C. M., Heckhausen, J. ve Wrosch, C. (2013). Developmental regulation across the life span: Toward a new synthesis. Developmental Psychology. 49(5), 964-972. doi: 10.1037/a0029231.
11. Hamm, J. M., Perry, R. P., Chipperfield, J. G., Heckhausen, J. ve Parker, P. C. (2016). A motivationenhancing treatment to sustain goal engagement during life course transitions. Motivation and Emotion, 40(6), 814-829.
12. Hamm, J. M., Stewart, T. L., Perry, R. P., Clifton, R. A., Chipperfield, J. G. ve Heckhausen, J. (2013). Sustaining primary control striving for achievement goals during challenging developmental transitions: The role of secondary control strategies. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35(3), 286-297.
13. Haverstock, N. B., Ruthig, J. C. ve G. Chipperfield, J. (2019). Primary and secondary control strategies and psychological well-being among familial caregivers of older adults with dementia. The Journal of Social Psychology, doi: 10.1080/00224545.2019.1592095.
14. Heckhausen, J. (1999). Developmental regulation in adulthood: Age-normative and sociostructural constraints as adaptive challenges. New York, NJ: Cambridge University Press.
15. Heckhausen, J., Chang, E. S., Greenberger, E. ve Chen, C. (2013). Striving for educational and career goals during the transition after high school: What is beneficial? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 1385–1398.
16. Heckhausen, J. ve Schulz, R. (1993). Optimization by selection and compensation: Balancing primary and secondary control in life span development. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 16(2), 287-303.
17. Heckhausen, J. ve Schulz, R. (1995). A life-span theory of control. Psychological Review, 102(2), 284304.
18. Heckhausen, J., Schulz, R. ve Wrosch, C. (1998). Developmental regulation in adulthood: Optimization in primary and secondary control. Technical Report, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
19. Heckhausen, J. ve Wrosch, C. (2016). Challenges to developmental regulation across the life course: What are they and which individual differences matter? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(2), 145-150.
20. Heckhausen, J., Wrosch, C. ve Schulz, R. (2010). A motivational theory of life-span development. Psychological Review, 117(1), 32-60. Heckhausen, J., Wrosch, C. ve Schulz, R. (2019). Agency and motivation in adulthood and old age. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 191-217.
21. Helsen, M., Vollebergh, W. ve Meeus, W. (2000). Social support from parents and friends and emotional problems in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29(3), 319-335.
22. Jobin, J. ve Wrosch, C. (2016). Goal disengagement capacities and severity of disease across older adulthood: The sample case of the common cold. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40, 137–144.
23. Koppe, K. ve Rothermund, K. (2017). Let it go: Depression facilitates disengagement from unattainable goals. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 54, 278-284.
24. Kurt, D. ve Uçanok, Z. (2019). Gelişimsel hedefler ve iyilik halinin beliren yetişkinlerde incelenmesi. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 11(Araştırma özel sayısı 1), 118-135. Kuş, E. (2006). Bilgisayar destekli nitel veri analizi. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi), Ankara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
25. Messersmith, E. E. ve Schulenberg, J. E. (2010). Goal attainment, goal striving, and well-being during the transition to adulthood: A ten-year U.S. national longitudinal study. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 130, 27-40.
26. Nurmi, J. E. (2004). Socialization and self-development: Channeling, selection, adjustment, and reflection. In R. M. Lerner ve L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 85124).
27. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Piko, B. (2000). Perceived social support from parents and peers: Which is the stronger predictor of adolescent substance use? Substance Use & Misuse, 35(4), 617-630.
28. Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J. R. ve Snyder, S. S. (1982). Changing the world and changing the self: A twoprocess model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 5-37.
29. Russell, A. ve Anderson, S. F. (2018). The relationship between self-regulatory strategies, daily stress, and negative affect in college females: An analysis of typical levels and intraindividual variability. Emerging Adulthood, doi: 10.1177/2167696818775149.
30. Salmela-Aro, K. (2009). Personal goals and well-being during critical life transitions: The four C’sChanneling, choice, co-agency and compensation. Advances in Life Course Research, 14, 63-73.
31. Salmela-Aro, K., Aunola, K. ve Nurmi, J.-E. (2007). Personal goals during emerging adulthood: A 10year follow-up. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22(6), 690-715.
32. Sawaumi, T., Yamaguchi, S., Park, J. ve Robinson, A. R. (2015). Japanese control strategies regulated by urgency and interpersonal harmony: Evidence based on extended conceptual framework. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(2), 252-268.
33. Schilling, O. K., Wahl, H. W., Boerner, K., Horowitz, A., Reinhardt, J. P., Cimarolli, V. R., … Heckhausen, J. (2016). Developmental regulation with progressive vision loss: Use of control strategies and affective well-being. Developmental Psychology, 52(4), 679–694.
34. Schneider, B. ve Stevenson, D. (1999). The ambitious generation. Educational Leadership, 57(4), 22-25.
35. Schulz, R. ve Heckhausen, J. (1996). A life span model of successful aging. American Psychologist, 51(7), 702-714.
36. Shane, J. ve Heckhausen, J. (2016). For better or worse: Young adults’ opportunity beliefs and motivational self-regulation during career entry. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(2), 107-116.
37. Stice, E., Ragan, J. ve Randall, P. (2004). Prospective relations between social support and depression: Differential direction of effects for parent and peer support? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113(1), 155-159.
38. Şahin, İ., Zoraloğlu, Y. R. ve Fırat, N. Ş. (2011). Üniversite öğrencilerinin yaşam amaçları, eğitsel hedefleri üniversite öğreniminden beklentileri ve memnuniyet durumları. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 3(3), 429-452.
39. Tynkkynen, L., Dietrich, J. ve Salmela-Aro, K. (2014). Career goal-related success expectations across two educational transitions: A seven-year longitudinal study. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11(3), 356-372.
40. Uçanok, Z. (2001). Gelişimsel düzenleme modeli çerçevesinde genç yetişkin, orta yaş ve yaşlılıkta kontrol stratejilerinin incelenmesi. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi), Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
41. Uçanok, Z. (2002a). Gelişimsel düzenleme modelinin psikometrik olarak incelenmesi. Psikiyatri, Psikoloji, Psikofarmakoloji Dergisi (3P),10(2),141-153.
42. Uçanok, Z. (2002b). Gelişimsel düzenleme modeli: Yetişkinlikte kontrol stratejilerinin incelenmesi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 17(49), 1-16.
43. Uno, M., Mortimer, J. T., Kim, M. ve Vuolo, M. (2010). “Holding on” or “coming to terms” with educational underachievement: A longitudinal study of ambition and attainment. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 130, 41-56.
44. Varjas, K., Nastasi, B. K., Moore, R. B. ve Jayasena, A. (2005). Using ethnographic methods for development of culture specific interventions. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 241-258. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2005.04.006
45. Vasalampi, K., Salmela-Aro, K. ve Nurmi, J. E. (2009). Adolescents’ self-concordance, school engagement, and burnout predict their educational trajectories. European Psychologist, 14(4), 332341.
46. Versey, H. S. (2015). Managing work and family: Do control strategies help? Developmental psychology, 51(11), 1672-1681.
47. Wrosch, C., Heckhausen, J. ve Lachman, M. E. (2000). Primary and secondary control strategies for managing health and financial stress across adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 15(3), 387-399.
48. Wrosch, C., Schulz, R. ve Heckhausen, J. (2002). Health stresses and depressive symptomatology in the elderly: The importance of health engagement control strategies. Health Psychology, 21(4), 340-348.
49. Yavuzer, H., Demir, İ., Meşeci, F., ve Sertelin, Ç. (2005). Günümüz gençliğinin gelecek beklentileri. Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2, 93-103.
50. Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK) (2019, 27 Ekim). Yıllara göre üniversitelere başvuran ve yerleşen aday sayıları. Erişim adresi: https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/images/ykgi/YILLARA_GORE_ UNIVERSITELERE_BASVURAN_YERLESEN_ADAY_SAYILARI.pdf