A PROPOSAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY: TOWARDS A DIVERGENT POLITICAL AND SPIRITUAL ‘REVOLUTION’

Öz

The purpose of this work is to provide the means for a better understanding of the new and multifaceted conceptualizations of environmental sustainability. The projection extends from insights gathered from a renewal of ancient cosmological views that have become prominent in contemporary political understandings, coupled with the similarities of the unique cultures of Indigenous Peoples, with their distinctive manners of perceiving the necessity of environmental sustainability. Indigenous Peoples have always sought to retain their cultural, economic, and political characteristics distinct from the dominant societies. Yet they are included as well within the UN in one the primary concerns generated by the “International Community,” as a motivating factor of global governance. The goal of environmental sustainability is within contemporary global governance. It is directed towards the present day through the use of concepts that have persisted in Indigenous histories for centuries. Contemporary understandings of global governance and the earthly-view of Indigenous Peoples strive together toward environmental sustainability.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Environment,Nature,Politics,Religion,Spirituality,Cosmological,Global Governance,Economic Justice,Sacred Indigenous Dreamtime

A PROPOSAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY: TOWARDS A DIVERGENT POLITICAL AND SPIRITUAL ‘REVOLUTION’

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, yeni ve çok-yönlü çevresel sürdürülebilirlik kavramsallaştırmalarının daha iyi anlaşılabilmesini sağlamak için bir yol açmaktır. Buna ilişkin öngörü, temelini, yalnızca onlara özgü olacak şekilde çevresel sürdürülebilirliğin gerekliliğinin farkına varmış olan yerli halkların biricik kültürleriyle olan benzerlikleriyle çağdaş siyaset yaklaşımlarında hakim olan kadim kozmolojik görüşlerin yeniden canlanmasından edinilen bilgilerden almaktadır. Yerli halklar; kültürel, ekonomik ve siyasi özelliklerini egemen toplumlardan uzak tutarak her zaman kendi yaşam şekillerini sürdürmeye çabalamışlardır. Bununla birlikte küresel yönetimin teşvik edici bir etkisi olarak “Uluslararası Toplum”ca üretilen temel kaygılar dahilinde Birleşmiş Milletler’de yer almaktadırlar. Çevresel sürdürülebilirliğin hedefi, günümüz küresel yönetim kapsamında yer bulmaktadır. Günümüze yönlenişi ise, yüzyıllar boyunca yerli halk hikayelerinde süregelen kavramların kullanımı üzerinden gerçekleşmiştir. Çağdaş küresel yönetim yaklaşımları ve yerli halkların dünyevi bakışı, çevresel sürdürülebilirlik yönünde beraberce mücadele etmektedirler.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çevre,Doğa,Siyaset,Din,Tinselik,Kozmolojik,Küresel Yönetişim,Ekonomik Adalet,Kutsal Yerli “Rüyazaman”

Kaynakça

1. Arendt, Hannah. (1963). On Revolution, London: Penguin Classics.
2. Arendt, Hannah. (1958). The Human Condition, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
3. Arendt, Hannah. (1978). The Life of the Mind, San Diego, New York and London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
4. Arendt, Hannah. (1972). “Thoughts on Politics and Revolution: A Commentary.” In Crisi of the Republic, (pp. 199 – 233) San Diego, New York, London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
5. Davis, Megan. (2008). “‘A Home at the United Nations’: Indigenous Peoples and International Advocacy.” Andrew F. Cooper, Brain Hocking, William Maley (Eds.), Global Governance and Diplomacy: Worlds Apart?, (pp. 211 – 233), New York, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
6. Eliade, Mircea.(1954). “The Terror of History”. In Willard R. Trask, (Trans.), The Myth of Eternal Return, Or, Cosmos and History Princeton: Princeton University Press.
7. Goodland, Robert & Daly, Herman. “Environmental Sustainability: Universal and Non- Negotiable,” in Ecological Applications, Vol. 6, No. 4 (Nov., 1996), pp. 1002– 1017.
8. Goodland, Robert. “The Concept of Environmental Sustainability,” in Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, Vol. 26 (1995), 1 – 24.

9. Harvey, David. “Neo-liberalism As Creative Destruction,” in Geografiska Annaler, Series B., Human Geography, Vol. 88, No. 2, Geography and Power of Geography (2008), pp. 145 – 158.
10. Johnston, Basil. Ojibway Heritage, McClelland & Stewart, Toronto, 1976.
11. Lawlor, Robert (1991). Voices of the First Day: Awakening in the Aboriginal Dreamtime. Rochester, Vermont: Inner Traditions International.
12. Machhiavelli, Niccolo. (1989). “Book III: Floreence From 1353 to 1414, Chapter 10, “The people take arms; the Guelfi flee. 1378.” In A. Gilbert (Trans. &Ed.), The History of Florence, in Machiavelli: The Chief Works And Others, Volume Three (pp. 1153 – 1155). Durham and London: Duke University Press.
13. Nelson, Brian. (2006). “The Making of Leviathan.” In The Making of the Modern State: A Theoretical Evolution (pp. 55 – 82). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
14. Nelson, Robert .H. (1995). “Sustainability, Efficiency, and God: Economic Values a and Sustainability Debates,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, Vol. 26, pp. 135- 154.
15. Oelschlaeger, Max. (1991). The Idea of Wilderness: From Prehistory to the Age of Ecology, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16. Paehlke, Robert. “Sustainability as a Bridging Concept,” Conservation Biology, Vol. 19, No. 1, (February, 2005), pp. 36 – 39.
17. Salwasser, Hal. 1993. “Sustainability Needs More Than Better Science,” Ecological Applications, Vol. 3, No. 4, (Nov. 1993), pp. 587-589.
18. Samways, Louise. (2002) Spirituality Without God. Toronto: Louise Samways.
19. Schendler, Auden. “Trench Warfare, Not Surgery.” In, Getting Green Done: Hard Truths from the Front Lines of the Sustainability Revolution, Public Affairs, New York, 2009, pp. 1 – 24.
20. Schendler, Auden. “The Proximity of a Sustainable World,” in Getting Green Done: Hard Truths From the Front Lines of the Sustainability Revolution, Public Affairs, New York, 2009, pp. 241 – 252.
21. Speth, James Gustav. (2008). The Bridge at the Edge of World Capitalism, the Environment, Crossing From Crisis to Sustainability. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
22. Sveiby, Karl-Erik. “Collective Leadership with power symmetry: Lessons from Aboriginal prehistory,” in, Leadership, 7(4) lea.sagepub.com, UK, 2011, pp. 385 – 414.
23. Thakur, Ramesh. (2008). “Conclusion: National Diplomacy and Global Governance. In Andrew F. Cooper, Brian Hocking & William Maley(Eds.). Global Governance and Diplomacy: Worlds Apart? (pp. 288 -289).New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
24. Vattimo, Gianni. (1990). “Introduction.” In The End of Modernity: Nihilism and Hermeneutics in Postmodern Culture (pp. 2 – 51) Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore.
25. Williston, Byron. (2012). “Economics and Ecology.” In B. Williston (Ed.), Environmental Ethics for Canadians (pp. 108 – 132). Don Mills Ontario: Oxford University Press.
26. Williston, Byron. (2012) “Sustainability.” In, Environmental Ethics: for Canadians (pp 357 – 385). Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press.
27. Wiser, James. L. (1982) “John Locke.” In Political Philosophy: A History of the Search for Order (pp. 209 – 228). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28. Wiser, James. L. (1982). “Thomas Hobbes,” in, Political Philosophy: A History of the Search for Order (pp. 185 – 208). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.