SAVAŞ SONRASI JAPONYA'DA SANAYİ POLİTİKASI: MITI (ULUSLAR ARASI TİCARET VE SANAYİ BAKANLIĞI) NE KADAR BAŞARILIYDI?

Öz

Bu çalışmada II. Dünya Savaşından sonra hızlı bir sınaî toparlanma ve gelişme yaşayan Japonya’da, sanayi politikalarının yürütücüsü konumunda olan MITI’nin yaptığı uygulamalar incelenmiş ve bu politikaların ne kadar başarılı olduğu tartışılarak, Japon sanayi politikasının detayları araştırılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Japonya
• sanayileşme
• sanayi politikası
• MITI

Öz

This study has attempted to explore the impact of the post-war Japanese industrial policy on economic recovery and development process in Japan after the The World War II, The study has shown that interventions of MITI (Ministry of International Trade and Industry) hardly contributed to the industrial development of Japanx unlike generally accepted thoughts on Japan industrial recovery,

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Japan
• industrialization
• industrial policy
• MITI

Kaynakça

1. The EEAG Report on the European Economy 2008, Europe in A Globalised World, CES ifo, http://www.cesifo- group.de/pls/guestci/download/EEAG%20Repor t%202008/EEAG-2008.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 1.11. 2008).
2. PARK, Sang-Chul, (2000), “Industrial Policy Development and Regional and Diachronic Comparison of Japanese South Korean Economic Strategies”, Handbook Global Economic Policy, Stuart S. Nagel (Editor), New York, NY, USA: Marcel Dekker Incorporated, 2000, içinde, ss. 111–130.
3. The Wilson Quarterly, MITI Misfires. (Japan's Ministry of International Trade and Industry). 18, no: 3, (Summer 1994).
4. MASAHIRO, Okuno-Fujiwara, “Industrial Policy in Japan: A Political Economy View”, Trade with Japan: Has the Door Opened Wider? Krugman, Paul (Editor). Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press, 1992. içinde, ss. 271-303.
5. KUSAGO, Takayoshi, (2006), “Rethinking of Economic Growth and Life Satisfaction in Post WWII Japan –A Fresh Approach, Social Indicators Research, 81, ss. 79–102.
6. NEZU, Risaburo, (2007), “Industrial Policy in Japan”, J. Ind. Compet. Trade, 7, ss. 229–243.
7. VICKERY, Graham, (1994), “The Patterns of Industrial Policy”, OECD Observer, no: 191, (Dec-Jan 1994,), ss. 5-9.
8. KIKKAWA, Takeo, (1995), "Enterprise Groups, Industry Associations, and Government: the Case of the Petrochemical Industry in Japan, Business History, 37, no:3 (July 1995), ss. 89– 111.

9. GÖNENÇ, Rauf, (1994), "A New Approach to Industrial Policy", OECD Observer, no: 187, (April-May 1994), ss.16-19.
10. MIWA, Yoshiro ve J. Mark Ramseyer, (2003), “Capitalist Politicians, Socialist Bureaucrats? Legends of Goverment Planning from Japan”, The Antitrust Bulletin, Fall 2003, ss. 595–627.
11. NOGUCHI, Asahi, (2000), “External ‘Industrial Liberalization and Structure Policy’ “, Japanese Economics and Economists since 1945, Aiko Ikeo (ed.), London, UK: Routledge Curzon, ss. 255–280.
12. KUCHIKI, Akifumi, (2007), “Industrial Policy in Asia”, IDE Discussion Paper No. 128, October 2007, Japan External Trade Organization.
13. KIYOTA, Kozo ve Tetsuji OKAZAKİ, (2008), “Industrial Policy Cuts Two Ways: Evidence from Cotton Spinning Firms in Japan, 1953- 1979”, CIRJE-F-563, http://www.e.u- tokyo.ac.jp/cirje/research/03research02dp.html, (Erişim tarihi: 03.11.2008).
14. SUZUKI, Yuzuru, (2006), “Sociopsychological Analysis of Japanese Industrial Policy: The Sumitomo Metals Incident”, International Journal of Japanese Sociology, Number 15, ss. 86–98.
15. DILERONZO, Thomas J., (1984), “The Political Economy of National Industrial Policy”, Cato Journal, Vol. 4, No. 2, ss. 587-607.
16. BRANSLETTER, Lee ve Mariko SAKAKİBARA, (1997), “Japanese Research Consortia: A Microeconometric Analysis of Industrial Policy”, NBER Working Paper No: 6066.
17. RODRIK, Dani, (2004), “Industrial Policy for the Twenty-First Century”, UNIDO Working Paper, http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~drodrik/unidosep.p df (Erişim Tarihi: 14. 11. 2008).
18. GORDILLO, Fernando, (t.y.), “Industrial Policy in Japan”, http://www.uees.edu.ec/investigacion/cuaderno7 /tema2.PDF (Erişim tarihi: 25.11.2008).
19. SPISSINGER, Kristi, Block, Walter E. ve Robert W. McGEE, (1998), “No Policy is Good Policy: A Radical Proposal for U.S. Industrial Policy”. http://ssrn.com/abstract=115075 (Erişim tarihi: 22.11.2008).
20. MIYAJIMA, Hideaki (1992), “Japanese Industrial Policy during the Intewar Period: Strategies for International and Domestic Competition”, Business and Economic History, Second Series, Vol: 21, ss. 270–79.
21. HAQUE, Irfan ul, (2007), “Rethinking Industrial Policy”, UNCTAD Discussion Papers, No: 183.
22. INOE, Kengo, (t.y.), “The Growth Experience of Japan –What Lessons to Draw?”, http://www.rba.gov.au/publicationsandresearch/ Conferences/1995/Inoue.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 05.12.2008).
23. SAKOH, Katsuro, (1984), “Japanese Economic Success: Industrial Policy or Free Market?”, Cato Journal, Vol: 4, No: 2, ss. 521–548.
24. DICK, Andrew. (1995), Industrial Policy and Semiconductors: Missing the Target, Washington, DC, USA: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1995.
25. KAGAMI, Mitsuhiro, (1995), “The Role of Industrial Policy: Japan’s Experience”, Revista de Economia Politica, Vol: 15, No. 1 (57), ss. 119–133.
26. El-AGRAA, Ali M., (1997), “UK Competitiveness Policy Versus Japanese Industrial Policy”, Economic Journal, Autumn.
27. PACK, Howard ve Kamal SAGGI, (Fall 2006), “Is There a Case for Industrial Policy? A Critical Survey”, The World Bank Research Observer, vol. 21, no. 2, ss. 267–97.
28. CHANG, Yanru, (2001), “Analysis of Government Strategies to Achieve Industrial Competitiveness: A Comparative Study of Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and China”, Unpublished Doctorate Thesis, Florida Atlantic University.
29. FAN, P., ve C. WATANABE, (2006), “Promoting Industrial Development through Technology Policy: Lessons from Japan and China”, Technology in Society, 28 (2006) ss. 303–320.
30. KIYOTAA, Kozo ve Tetsuji OKAZAKIB, (2005), “Foreign Technology Acquisition Policy and Firm Performance in Japan, 1957–1970: Micro- aspects of Industrial Policy”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23, ss. 563–586.