A CASE STUDY OF COMPETITIVENESS IN LATIN AMERICA: SCHUMPETERIAN APPROACH AND NEOSTRUCTURALIST SCHOOL

Emine Tahsin

A CASE STUDY OF COMPETITIVENESS IN LATIN AMERICA: SCHUMPETERIAN APPROACH AND NEOSTRUCTURALIST SCHOOL

Öz

ÖZET

Bu calısma, Latin Amerika'da neoyapıalcıokulun rekabet edebilirlik kavramııtemel alarak Schumpeterci yaklasıa bakıııanaliz etmeye odaklanıor. Tarihsel

surec icerisinde yapıalcıyaklasıları neoyapıalcıyaklasılara evrildiğ

gorulurken, adil buyume ile sistematik rekabet edebilirlik kavramlarıneoyapıalcıokulum temelleri olarak tanılanmaktadı. Schumpeterci yaklasıları iktisadi

kalkıma, innovasyon ve girisimci kavramlarıdikkate alıarak, bu kavramları

neoyapıalcıokulun temellerini olusturan adil buyume ile sistematik rekabet edebilirlik

icerisinde ne sekilde kullanıdığıa yanılar uretmeye calımaktadı. Calıma

kapsamıda neoyapıalcıanalizin Schumpeterci yaklasılardan doğudan etkilendiğ

acı bir sekilde gorulmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

ALTIMIR O.(1990); “ Development, crisis and equity”, Cepal Review, No: 40, LC/G.1613-P, Santi- ago, Chile.
BIELSCHOWSKY Ricardo (2009); “Sixty years of ECLAC: structuralism and neo-structuralism”, Cepal Review , No:97, April 2009, pp.171-192.
CIMOLI Mario and KATZ Jorge(2001); “Structural Reforms Technological Gaps and Economic Development. A Latin American Perspective”, DRUID-Nelson and Winter conference papers, http://www.druid.dk/conferences/nw/paper1/cimoli- katz.pdf, Access at 20.03. 2011.
ECLAC(1990); “Changing Production Patterns Equity”, with /xml/8/4708/lcg1601i.html, Access at 2.01.2011.
ECLAC(1992); “Social Equity and Changing Production Patterns: An Integrated Approach”
http://www.eclac.org/publicaciones/xml/3/4703/ lcg1701i.html, Acess at 12.02. 2011.
ECLAC(2000);“Globalization and Development ”, http://www.eclac.org/cgi-bin/getProd. asp?xml=/ publicaciones/xml/0/10030/P10030.xml, 2.02. 2011. Access at
ECLAC(2004);“Productive development in Open Economies” http://www.eclac.org/publicaciones /xml/4/15134/DGI-2247-SES30-4summary.pdf, Acess at 10 January 2011

ECLAC(2010); “Latin America Poverty and Extreme Poverty”, http://www.eclac.cl/prensa/noticias /comunicados/4/41804/LATIN_AMERICA_POVERT Y_AND_EXTREME_POVERTY.pdf, Access at 12 February 2011.
ESSER, K. and others (1996); “Systemic competitiveness: a new challenge for firms and for government”, Cepal Review , No: 59, August 1996, pp. 39-53.
FFRENCH -DAVIS Ricardo (2007); “Growth Challenges For Latin America Reforms What Has Happened, Why and How to Reform Them”, http://www.growthcommission.org/storage/cgdev/docu ments/CaseStudies/Paper%20Ffrench-Davis.pdf, cess at 25.04. 2011. Ac
GOMA Oscar Muñoz (1993); “The process of industrialization : theories, experiences, and policies “, in Development from Within: Toward a Neostructuralist Approach for Latin America,. Osvaldo SUNKEL (ed.), Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, pp. 257–85.
HANUSCH Horst and PYKA Andreas( 2005); “ Principles Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsieneine”, http://www. economics”, Acess
HOFMAN André and TORRES Miguel (2008); “ECLAC Thinking in the Cepal Review(1976-2008)”, Cepal Review, No:96, pp.9-26.
KATZ Jorge (2000); “Structural change and la- bor productivity growth in Latin American manufactur- ing industries”, World Development, 28 (953). pp. 1583-1596.
KNIGHT P. and MARQUES R.(2008) ; “Closing the Technology Gap”, in. Can Latin America Compete? Confronting the Challenges of Globalization,”Edited by Jerry HAAR and John PRICE , Palgrave , Macmillan, pp.99-121. LEIVA Fernando
Ignacio(2008); “Latin
American Neostructuralism: The Contradictions of
Post-Neoliberal Development”, Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press, 315 pages.
LOVE Joseph L.(1980); “Raşl Prebisch and the Origins of the Doctrine of Unequal Exchange,” Latin American Research Review, 15 : 45–72.
LOVE Joseph L.(2005);"The rise and fall of Structuralism", inc. Economic Doctrines in Latin America,Origins, Embedding and Evolution, Valpy FITZ GERALD and Rosemary THROP(edt.) Palgrave Macmillan, pp.157-182.
LOVE Joseph L.(2005); “The Rise and Decline of Economic Structuralism in Latin America:
New Dimensions”, Latin American Research Review, 40: 3, pp. 100-125.
OCAMPO José Antonio (2000); “Globalization and Development”, http://www.bndes.gov.br /Site BNDES/export/sites/default/bndes_pt/Galerias/Arquivo s/conhecimento/seminario/novosrumos_Ocampo.pdf , Access at 4 .02. 2011.
OCAMPO José Antonio (2001); “Raul Prebisch and the development agenda at the dawn of the twenty- first century”, Cepal Review, No. 75, December 2001, pp.23-37.
OCAMPO José Antonio (2002); “Structural dynamics and economic development”, http://www .newschool.edu/scepa/originalsite/papers/workshop/oca mpo_200402.pdf, Access at:2.01.2011
OCAMPO José Antonio (2004); “Lights and shadows in Latin American structural reforms”, (in) Economic Reforms Growth and Inequality in Latin America: Essays in Honor of Albert Berry, Gustavo INDART http://www.networkideas.org/feathm/sep2006/pdf/Ligh ts_Shadows_Reform_Latin_America.pdf, Access at: 09.01.2010. Aldershot, Ashgate,
OCAMPO J. A. (2005); “Latin America and the World Economy in the Long Twentieth Century,” The Great Divergence: Hegemony, Uneven Development, and Global Inequality(edt.), Jomo, K. S., New Delhi: The Oxford University Press. OECD (2010); “OECD Factbook 2010 Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics” , http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/oecd- factbook_18147364, Access at 10.05.2011.
RAMOS J., and OSVALDO S.(1993);” Toward a neostructuralist synthesis”, in Osvaldo Sunkel (ed.) Development from Within: Toward a Neostruc- turalist Approach for Latin America, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 5-22.
REISMAN David(2004); ”Schumpeter’s Mar- ket, Enterprise and Evolution” , EE Publishing, London, 283 pages. RODRIGUEZ Ennio (1993); change Sunkel (ed.), development a challenge”,in O. Development from Within: Toward a Neostructuralist Approach for Latin America,. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, pp.223-256.
ROSALES V., O. (1994); Industrial policy and promotion of competitiveness, Cepal Review, No: 53, pp.59-79.
SCHUMPETER Joseph A.(1962); The theory of economic development, Oxford University Press, 212 pages. SUNKEL O. (1989); “Structuralism,
Dependency and Institutionalism: An Exploration of
Common Ground andDisparities” Journal of
Economic Issues, 23:2, pp. 519-533
SUNKEL O.(1993); “From Inward-Looking Development to Development from Within,” in Development from Within: Toward a Neostructuralist Approach for Latin America edt. O. SUNKELBoulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, pp. 23-59.
SUNKEL O. and G. ZULETA (1990); “Neo- structuralism versus neoliberalism in the 1990s”, Cepal Review, No. 42, LC/G.1642-P, December, Santiago, Chile.
SWEDERBERG R.(1993); “Joseph A. Schumpeter : his life and work”, Cambridge, UK : Polity Press., 293 pages.
World Intellectural Property Organization (WIPO, 2010); “ World Intellectual Property Indicators 2010”,http://www.wipo.int/ipstats/en/statistics/ patents /, Access at 2.06.2011.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yazarlar

Emine Tahsin

Yayımlanma Tarihi

28 Temmuz 2011

Gönderilme Tarihi

28 Temmuz 2011

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2011 Sayı: 1

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA48YC89GJ

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Tahsin, E. (2011). A CASE STUDY OF COMPETITIVENESS IN LATIN AMERICA: SCHUMPETERIAN APPROACH AND NEOSTRUCTURALIST SCHOOL. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1, 115-128. https://izlik.org/JA48YC89GJ

AMA

1.Tahsin E. A CASE STUDY OF COMPETITIVENESS IN LATIN AMERICA: SCHUMPETERIAN APPROACH AND NEOSTRUCTURALIST SCHOOL. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2011;(1):115-128. https://izlik.org/JA48YC89GJ

Chicago

Tahsin, Emine. 2011. “A CASE STUDY OF COMPETITIVENESS IN LATIN AMERICA: SCHUMPETERIAN APPROACH AND NEOSTRUCTURALIST SCHOOL”. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, sy 1: 115-28. https://izlik.org/JA48YC89GJ.

EndNote

Tahsin E (01 Kasım 2011) A CASE STUDY OF COMPETITIVENESS IN LATIN AMERICA: SCHUMPETERIAN APPROACH AND NEOSTRUCTURALIST SCHOOL. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 1 115–128.

IEEE

[1]E. Tahsin, “A CASE STUDY OF COMPETITIVENESS IN LATIN AMERICA: SCHUMPETERIAN APPROACH AND NEOSTRUCTURALIST SCHOOL”, Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, sy 1, ss. 115–128, Kas. 2011, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA48YC89GJ

ISNAD

Tahsin, Emine. “A CASE STUDY OF COMPETITIVENESS IN LATIN AMERICA: SCHUMPETERIAN APPROACH AND NEOSTRUCTURALIST SCHOOL”. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 1 (01 Kasım 2011): 115-128. https://izlik.org/JA48YC89GJ.

JAMA

1.Tahsin E. A CASE STUDY OF COMPETITIVENESS IN LATIN AMERICA: SCHUMPETERIAN APPROACH AND NEOSTRUCTURALIST SCHOOL. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2011;:115–128.

MLA

Tahsin, Emine. “A CASE STUDY OF COMPETITIVENESS IN LATIN AMERICA: SCHUMPETERIAN APPROACH AND NEOSTRUCTURALIST SCHOOL”. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, sy 1, Kasım 2011, ss. 115-28, https://izlik.org/JA48YC89GJ.

Vancouver

1.Emine Tahsin. A CASE STUDY OF COMPETITIVENESS IN LATIN AMERICA: SCHUMPETERIAN APPROACH AND NEOSTRUCTURALIST SCHOOL. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi [Internet]. 01 Kasım 2011;(1):115-28. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA48YC89GJ