Effect of the Degree of Udder Contamination in Dairy Cows on the Somatic Cell Count in Milk

Cilt: 39 Sayı: 1 16 Kasım 2012
  • Jurii Mıtev
  • Zhivka Gergovska
  • Tchonka Mıteva
  • Nasko Vasılev
  • Krassimira Uzunova
  • Toncho Penev
PDF İndir
EN TR

-

Öz

The study includes a total o f 310 Black-and-white cows from 9 herds throughout the period from November 2010 t i l l January 2011. The farms used two rearing technologies (free and tied) and were o f different capacity. To assess the degree o f udder contamination a 4-grade system has been used. The rearing technology and the farm capacity had a reliable effect on somatic cells count (SCC) i n milk. I n tied rearing higher SCC have been recorded than i n free rearing, a lesser relative share o f cows w i t h clean udders (hygiene score -1) and a greater one o f cows w i t h contaminated udders (hygiene score 3 and 4). The greatest was the relative share o f cows w i t h contaminated udders (hygiene score 3 and 4) and the least clean were the cows i n farms w i t h tied rearing and capacity from 50 to 100 cows. Cows w i t h score 1 (clean udder) had the smallest somatic cell count - 172.4x103/ml, which was related to l o w risk o f mastitis diseases. The ones w i t h score 3 and 4 had somatic cell count over 400x103/ml. The availability o f more than 20% o f cows w i t h udder hygiene score 3 and 4 was an indicator for increased risk o f mastitis i n the herd and obtaining l o w quality milk. Somatic cell count i n m i l k depended largely on the maintenance o f bedding and the farm hygiene rather than the farm capacity and the rearing technology

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Barkema, H . W . , Schukken Y . H . , L a m T . J . G . M . , Beiboer M . L . , Benedictus, G . , Brand, A . , 19 Management practices associated w i t h low, medium and high somatic cell counts i n bulk milk. Journal o f Dairy Science 8 1 , 1917¬ 19
  2. Bey, R , Reneau, J . , Farnsworth, R . , 2002. The role of bedding management i n udder health. Proceedings o f National Mastitis Council 4 1 , 45Cook, N . , 2002. The influence o f barn design on dairy cow hygiene, lameness and udder health. Proceedings o f the 35th Annual Conference of American Association of Bovine Practitioners 183
  3. Grohn, Y . , Gonzales, R . , Wilson, D., Hertl, J . , Bennett, G . , Schulte, H . , Schukken, Y . , 2005. Effect o f pathogen-specific clinical mastitis on herd life i n two N e w York State dairy herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 7 1 , 105-125.
  4. Harvey, W . R . , 1987. User's guide for L S M M W PC-1 version, M i x e d model least-squares and maximum likelihood computer program. Ohio State University, Columbus.
  5. Kaneene, J . , Scott-Hurd, H . , 1990. The national animal monitoring system i n Michigan. Cost estimates o f selected dairy cattle diseases. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 8, 127-140.
  6. Rajala-Schultz, Grohn, P . Y . , McCulloch, C . , G u a r d , C . , 1999. Effect of clinical mastitis on m i l k yield i n dairy cows. Journal o f Dairy Science 82, 1213-1220.
  7. Reneau, J . K . , Seykora, A . J . , Heins, B . J . , 2003. Relationship of cow hygiene scores and SCC.
  8. Proceedings o f National Mastitis Council, Madison, W I , 362-363. Ruegg, P., 2004. Managing for M i l k Quality, University o f Wisconsin - Madison, pp. 1-9.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yazarlar

Jurii Mıtev Bu kişi benim

Zhivka Gergovska Bu kişi benim

Tchonka Mıteva Bu kişi benim

Nasko Vasılev Bu kişi benim

Krassimira Uzunova Bu kişi benim

Toncho Penev Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

16 Kasım 2012

Gönderilme Tarihi

16 Kasım 2012

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2013 Cilt: 39 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Mıtev, J., Gergovska, Z., Mıteva, T., Vasılev, N., Uzunova, K., & Penev, T. (2012). -. İstanbul Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 39(1), 76-83. https://doi.org/10.16988/iuvfd.78480
AMA
1.Mıtev J, Gergovska Z, Mıteva T, Vasılev N, Uzunova K, Penev T. -. iuvfd. 2012;39(1):76-83. doi:10.16988/iuvfd.78480
Chicago
Mıtev, Jurii, Zhivka Gergovska, Tchonka Mıteva, Nasko Vasılev, Krassimira Uzunova, ve Toncho Penev. 2012. “-”. İstanbul Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 39 (1): 76-83. https://doi.org/10.16988/iuvfd.78480.
EndNote
Mıtev J, Gergovska Z, Mıteva T, Vasılev N, Uzunova K, Penev T (01 Kasım 2012) -. İstanbul Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 39 1 76–83.
IEEE
[1]J. Mıtev, Z. Gergovska, T. Mıteva, N. Vasılev, K. Uzunova, ve T. Penev, “-”, iuvfd, c. 39, sy 1, ss. 76–83, Kas. 2012, doi: 10.16988/iuvfd.78480.
ISNAD
Mıtev, Jurii - Gergovska, Zhivka - Mıteva, Tchonka - Vasılev, Nasko - Uzunova, Krassimira - Penev, Toncho. “-”. İstanbul Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 39/1 (01 Kasım 2012): 76-83. https://doi.org/10.16988/iuvfd.78480.
JAMA
1.Mıtev J, Gergovska Z, Mıteva T, Vasılev N, Uzunova K, Penev T. -. iuvfd. 2012;39:76–83.
MLA
Mıtev, Jurii, vd. “-”. İstanbul Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 39, sy 1, Kasım 2012, ss. 76-83, doi:10.16988/iuvfd.78480.
Vancouver
1.Jurii Mıtev, Zhivka Gergovska, Tchonka Mıteva, Nasko Vasılev, Krassimira Uzunova, Toncho Penev. -. iuvfd. 01 Kasım 2012;39(1):76-83. doi:10.16988/iuvfd.78480