Studies on Socialization Characteristics Using Two Temperament Tests in German Dogue, Doberman and Riesenschnautzer Puppies

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 37 Sayı: 1, 43 - 52, 31.10.2011

Krasimira İvanova Uzunova İvanka Stoycheva Thonka Mıteva Rumen Binev Andrey Ivanov Anton Rousenov Tontcho Penev

Öz

The object of study was the influence of the nervous system type (temperament) of dogs from the German Dogue, Doberman, and Riesenschnautzer breeds on the extent of their socialization (adaptation to the environment). Two tests were used to examine the animals' behavior: the mirror test and the Queinnec test. It was established that puppies of the German Dogue breed possessed the highest socializing capabilities, followed by the Riesenschnautzer and Doberman breeds. This means that the representatives of the German Dogue breed would require the least amount of training time in order to form specific behavior. The Riesenschnautzer exhibited average ability to socialize, and will adapt to the environment more easily than the Doberman breed and with more hardship than the German Dogue. The puppies that would be hardest to train were the ones from the Doberman breed, as they are most prone to aggression and ill temper.

Key words: Puppies, socialization, temperament type, behavior, test

Anahtar Kelimeler

Köpek yavruları, sosyalizasyon, mizaç tipi, davranış, test

Kaynakça

• Arata, S., Momozawa, Y . , Takeuchi, Y . , Mori, Y , 2010. Important behavioral traits for predicting guide dog qualification. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Science 72, 539-545.
• Campan, R., Scapini, F , 2002. Les causes proximales du comportement. In: Ethologie. Approche systematique du comportement, De Boeck, Bruxelles, Belgium, pp. 35-98.
• Denkov, V., 1996. Dog Encyclopaedia, Horizon Publishing House, Sofia, pp. 30-35.
• Diederich, C., 1998. Les tests comportementaux chez le chien. Le point de vue du chercheur, Le monde veterinaire 59, 19-27
• Diederich C., Giffroy, J . M., 2006. Behavioural testing in dogs: a review of methodology in search for standardisation, Applied Animal Behavioral Science 97, 51-72.
• Giffroy, J . M., 1998. Evolution des relations comportementales entre l'homme et le chien. "Le chien dans la societe", Séminaire de la Société Francophone de Cynotechnie,, Paris, France.
• Haverbeke, A., Rzepa, C., Depiereux, E . , Deroo, J . , Giffroy, J . M., Diederich, C., 2010. Assessing efficiency of a new behavioural modification programme on fearfulness and aggressiveness of military dogs. Applied Behavioral Science, 123,143-149.
• Houpt, K.A., 2007. Review article genetics of canine Behavior. Acta Veterinaria Brno 76, 431-444.
• Keeling, L . , Jensen, T, 2002. Behavioural disturbances, stress and welfare. In: Jensen P. (ed.): The Ethology of Domestic Animals. An introductory text. CABI Publishing, UK, pp. 79ı 78.
• Ley, J.M., Bennett, P.C., Coleman, G. J . , 2009. A refinement and validation of the Monash Canine Personality Questionnaire (MCPQ). Applied Animal Behavioral Science 116, 220-227.
• Mitsulov, A., 1993. Dog breeds in Bulgaria, Sofia, pp. 11; 62-63, 112-113.
• Montagnier, H., 1998, Le chien et l'enfant. Aspects medicaux et comportementaux. Le chien dans la societe, Séminaire de la Société Francophone de Cynotechnie, Paris, France,.
• Petkov, A., Enev, E . , Sivkova, S., Varlyakov, I.., Oblakov, N., 1999. Canine Behaviour, Stara Zagora, pp. 161-183.
• Queinnec, G., 1996. Les troubles du comportement et leur correction. Le comportement social du chien, Séminaire de la Société Francophone de Cynotechnie, Lyon, France, pp. 76-120.
• Renaud, S., 1996. Test utilizes pour l'analyse du caractere. Le comportement social du chien, Séminaire de la Société Francophone de Cynotechnie, Lyon, France, p. 30.
• Saetre, P., Strandberg, E . , Sundgren, P.E., Pettersson, U., Jazin, E . , Bergstrom, T.F., 2006. The genetic contribution to canine personality. Genes, Brain, Behavior 5, 240ı 248.
• Uzunova, K., 2006. Investigation of some hygienic and technological parameters of rearing facilities for dogs, PhD Thesis, pp. 108-113.
• Uzunova, K., Semerdjiev V., Stoyanchev, K . , Russenov, A., Tsandev, N., Yonkova, P., 2008. Effect of temperament type on socialization among companion dogs, Trakia Journal of Sciences 6, 33-35.
• Uzunova, K., Mitev, Y . , Miteva, Tch, Vashin, I., 2009. Prediction of the behaviour of puppies using tests with regard to their humane treatment and welfare, Trakia Journal of Sciences 7, 51-53.
• Uzunova, K., Radev, V., Varliakov, I . , 2010. Socialization of puppies - a marker of their future behaviour, Trakia Journal of Sciences 8, 70-73.
• Vastrade, F . , 1996. La socialization du chiot et son evaluation. Le comportement social du chien, Séminaire de la Société Francophone de Cynotechnie, Lyon, France, pp. 157-177.