Ates, A., Kearey, P., and Tufan, S., 1999, New Gravity and Magnetic Maps of Turkey, Geophys. J. Int., 136, 499-502, 1999.
Bingol, E., 1989. Geological map of Turkey (Scale: 1/2.000.000), General Directorate of Mineral Reaearch and Exploration (MTA), Ankara.
Blakely, R. J., and Simpson, R. W., 1986, Approximating edges of source bodies from magnetic or gravity anomalies, Geophys., 51, 1494- 1498.
Bozkurt, E., and Kocyigit, A., 1996, The Kazova basin: an active negative flower structure on the Almus Fault Zone, Turkey, Tectonopyhs., 265, 239- 254.
Gursoy, H., Piper, J.D.A., Tatar, O., and Mesci, L., 1998, Palaeomagnetic study of the Karaman and Karapinar volcanic complexes, central Turkey: neotectonic rotation in the south- central sector of the Anatolian Block. Tectonophysics 299, 191-211
Cordell, L., and Henderson, R.G., 1968, Iterative three-dimensional solution of gravity anomaly data using a digital computer, Geophys., 33, 596-601.
Kadioglu, Y.K., and Ozsan, A., 1998, Determination of the deep structure of the gabbroic rocks within Sulakyurt granitoid by the boreholes, Geological Bulletin of Turkey, 41, 177-185 (in Turkish).
Kaymakci, N., Duermeijer, C.E., Langereis, C., White, S.H., and Dijk, P.M.V., 2003(a), Paleomagnetic evolution of the Cankiri Basin (central Anatolia, Turkey): implications for oroclinal bending due to indentation, Geol. Mag., 140, 343- 355.
Kaymakci, N., White, S.H., and Wandijk, P.M., 2003(b), Kinematik and structural development of the Cankiri Basin (Central Anatolia, Turkey): a paleostress inversion study, Tectonophys., 364, 85- 113.
Klingele, E.E., Marson, I. and Kahle, H.G., 1991, Automatic interpretation of gravity gradiometric data in two dimensions: vertical gradient, Geophys. Pros., 39, 407-434.
Nabighian, M.N., 1972, The analytic signal of twodimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal crosssection: its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation, Geophys., 37, 507-517.
Nabighian, M.N., 1974, Additional comments on the analytic signal of two dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section, Geophys., 39, 85-92.
Nabighian, M.N., 1984, Toward a three-dimensional automatic interpretation of potential field data via generalized Hilbert transforms: Fundamental relations, Geophys., 49, 780-786.
Marson, I., and Klingele, E.E., 1993, Advantages of using the vertical gradient of gravity for 3-D interpretation, Geophys., 58, 1588-1595.
McClusky, S., Balassanian, S., Barka, A., Demir, C., Ergintav, S., Georgiev, I., Gurkan, O., Hamburger, M., Hurst, K., Kahle, H., Kastens, K., Kekelidze, G., King, R., Kotzev, V., Lenk, O., Mahmoud, S., Mishin, A., Nadariya, M., Ouzounis, A., Paradissis, D., Peter, Y., Prilepin, M., Reilinger R., Sanli, I., Seeger, H., Tealeb, A., Toksoz, M.N., and Veis, G., 2000, Global positioning system constraints on plate kinematics and dynamics in the eastern Mediterranean and Caucasu, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 5695-5719.
Roest, W.R., Verhoef, J., and Pilkington, M., 1992, Magnetic interpretation using the 3D analytic signal, Geophys., 57, 116-125. Salem, A., 2005, Interpretation of magnetic data using analytic signal derivations, Geophys. Pros., 53, 75- 82.
Saunders, P., Priestley, K. and Taymaz, T., 1998, Variations in the crustal structure beneath western Turkey, Geophys. J. Int., 134, 373–389.
Sengor, A.M.C., and Yılmaz, Y., 1981, Tethyan evolution of Turkey: a plate tectonic approach, Tectonophys., 75, 181-241.
Spector, A., and Grant, F. S., 1970, Statistical Models for Interpretation Aeromagnetic Data, Geophys., 35, 293-302.
Tatar, S., and Boztug, D., 2005, The syn-collisional Danaciobasi biotite leucogranite derived from the crustal thickening in central Anatolia (Kirikkale), Turkey, Geol. J., 40, 571-591.
Taymaz, T., Wright, T.J., Yolsal, S., Tan, O., Fielding, E., and Seyitoglu, G., 2007, Source characteristics of the 6 June 2000 Orta-Cankiri (central Turkey) earthquake: a synthesis of seismological, geological and geodetic (ınSAR9 observations, and internal deformation of the Anatolian plate, The Geological Society of London, 291, 259-290.
Ates, A., Kearey, P., and Tufan, S., 1999, New Gravity and Magnetic Maps of Turkey, Geophys. J. Int., 136, 499-502, 1999.
Bingol, E., 1989. Geological map of Turkey (Scale: 1/2.000.000), General Directorate of Mineral Reaearch and Exploration (MTA), Ankara.
Blakely, R. J., and Simpson, R. W., 1986, Approximating edges of source bodies from magnetic or gravity anomalies, Geophys., 51, 1494- 1498.
Bozkurt, E., and Kocyigit, A., 1996, The Kazova basin: an active negative flower structure on the Almus Fault Zone, Turkey, Tectonopyhs., 265, 239- 254.
Gursoy, H., Piper, J.D.A., Tatar, O., and Mesci, L., 1998, Palaeomagnetic study of the Karaman and Karapinar volcanic complexes, central Turkey: neotectonic rotation in the south- central sector of the Anatolian Block. Tectonophysics 299, 191-211
Cordell, L., and Henderson, R.G., 1968, Iterative three-dimensional solution of gravity anomaly data using a digital computer, Geophys., 33, 596-601.
Kadioglu, Y.K., and Ozsan, A., 1998, Determination of the deep structure of the gabbroic rocks within Sulakyurt granitoid by the boreholes, Geological Bulletin of Turkey, 41, 177-185 (in Turkish).
Kaymakci, N., Duermeijer, C.E., Langereis, C., White, S.H., and Dijk, P.M.V., 2003(a), Paleomagnetic evolution of the Cankiri Basin (central Anatolia, Turkey): implications for oroclinal bending due to indentation, Geol. Mag., 140, 343- 355.
Kaymakci, N., White, S.H., and Wandijk, P.M., 2003(b), Kinematik and structural development of the Cankiri Basin (Central Anatolia, Turkey): a paleostress inversion study, Tectonophys., 364, 85- 113.
Klingele, E.E., Marson, I. and Kahle, H.G., 1991, Automatic interpretation of gravity gradiometric data in two dimensions: vertical gradient, Geophys. Pros., 39, 407-434.
Nabighian, M.N., 1972, The analytic signal of twodimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal crosssection: its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation, Geophys., 37, 507-517.
Nabighian, M.N., 1974, Additional comments on the analytic signal of two dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section, Geophys., 39, 85-92.
Nabighian, M.N., 1984, Toward a three-dimensional automatic interpretation of potential field data via generalized Hilbert transforms: Fundamental relations, Geophys., 49, 780-786.
Marson, I., and Klingele, E.E., 1993, Advantages of using the vertical gradient of gravity for 3-D interpretation, Geophys., 58, 1588-1595.
McClusky, S., Balassanian, S., Barka, A., Demir, C., Ergintav, S., Georgiev, I., Gurkan, O., Hamburger, M., Hurst, K., Kahle, H., Kastens, K., Kekelidze, G., King, R., Kotzev, V., Lenk, O., Mahmoud, S., Mishin, A., Nadariya, M., Ouzounis, A., Paradissis, D., Peter, Y., Prilepin, M., Reilinger R., Sanli, I., Seeger, H., Tealeb, A., Toksoz, M.N., and Veis, G., 2000, Global positioning system constraints on plate kinematics and dynamics in the eastern Mediterranean and Caucasu, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 5695-5719.
Roest, W.R., Verhoef, J., and Pilkington, M., 1992, Magnetic interpretation using the 3D analytic signal, Geophys., 57, 116-125. Salem, A., 2005, Interpretation of magnetic data using analytic signal derivations, Geophys. Pros., 53, 75- 82.
Saunders, P., Priestley, K. and Taymaz, T., 1998, Variations in the crustal structure beneath western Turkey, Geophys. J. Int., 134, 373–389.
Sengor, A.M.C., and Yılmaz, Y., 1981, Tethyan evolution of Turkey: a plate tectonic approach, Tectonophys., 75, 181-241.
Spector, A., and Grant, F. S., 1970, Statistical Models for Interpretation Aeromagnetic Data, Geophys., 35, 293-302.
Tatar, S., and Boztug, D., 2005, The syn-collisional Danaciobasi biotite leucogranite derived from the crustal thickening in central Anatolia (Kirikkale), Turkey, Geol. J., 40, 571-591.
Taymaz, T., Wright, T.J., Yolsal, S., Tan, O., Fielding, E., and Seyitoglu, G., 2007, Source characteristics of the 6 June 2000 Orta-Cankiri (central Turkey) earthquake: a synthesis of seismological, geological and geodetic (ınSAR9 observations, and internal deformation of the Anatolian plate, The Geological Society of London, 291, 259-290.
Bilim, F., & Demir, D. (2012). Çankırı Baseni (Orta Anadolu, Türkiye) Gravite Anomalilerinin Sınır Analizleri ve Analitik Sinyallerle Yorumu ve Üç Boyutlu Modellenmesi. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi, 23(2).
AMA
Bilim F, Demir D. Çankırı Baseni (Orta Anadolu, Türkiye) Gravite Anomalilerinin Sınır Analizleri ve Analitik Sinyallerle Yorumu ve Üç Boyutlu Modellenmesi. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi. Mart 2012;23(2).
Chicago
Bilim, Funda, ve Dilek Demir. “Çankırı Baseni (Orta Anadolu, Türkiye) Gravite Anomalilerinin Sınır Analizleri Ve Analitik Sinyallerle Yorumu Ve Üç Boyutlu Modellenmesi”. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi 23, sy. 2 (Mart 2012).
EndNote
Bilim F, Demir D (01 Mart 2012) Çankırı Baseni (Orta Anadolu, Türkiye) Gravite Anomalilerinin Sınır Analizleri ve Analitik Sinyallerle Yorumu ve Üç Boyutlu Modellenmesi. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi 23 2
IEEE
F. Bilim ve D. Demir, “Çankırı Baseni (Orta Anadolu, Türkiye) Gravite Anomalilerinin Sınır Analizleri ve Analitik Sinyallerle Yorumu ve Üç Boyutlu Modellenmesi”, İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi, c. 23, sy. 2, 2012.
ISNAD
Bilim, Funda - Demir, Dilek. “Çankırı Baseni (Orta Anadolu, Türkiye) Gravite Anomalilerinin Sınır Analizleri Ve Analitik Sinyallerle Yorumu Ve Üç Boyutlu Modellenmesi”. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi 23/2 (Mart 2012).
JAMA
Bilim F, Demir D. Çankırı Baseni (Orta Anadolu, Türkiye) Gravite Anomalilerinin Sınır Analizleri ve Analitik Sinyallerle Yorumu ve Üç Boyutlu Modellenmesi. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi. 2012;23.
MLA
Bilim, Funda ve Dilek Demir. “Çankırı Baseni (Orta Anadolu, Türkiye) Gravite Anomalilerinin Sınır Analizleri Ve Analitik Sinyallerle Yorumu Ve Üç Boyutlu Modellenmesi”. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi, c. 23, sy. 2, 2012.
Vancouver
Bilim F, Demir D. Çankırı Baseni (Orta Anadolu, Türkiye) Gravite Anomalilerinin Sınır Analizleri ve Analitik Sinyallerle Yorumu ve Üç Boyutlu Modellenmesi. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi. 2012;23(2).