BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Analitik Sinyal Yöntemlerinin Manyetik Model Verileri Üzerinde Karşılaştırılması ve Arazi Örneği

Yıl 2005, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2, 151 - 162, 19.03.2012

Funda Bilim Abdullah Ateş

Öz

Comparison of Analytic Signal Methods on Magnetic Model Data and Field Example

Anahtar Kelimeler

Manyetik alan anomalisi Yatay ve düşey türev Analitik sinyal yöntemleri

Kaynakça

  • Baldwin, R.T., and Langel, R., 1993, Tables and Maps of the DGRF 1985 and IGRF 1990, Internat Union of Geodesy and Geophysical Assoc. of Geomagnetic and Aeronomy, IAGA Bulletin, 54, 158.
  • Bilim, F. And Ates, A., 2003, Analytic signal inferred from reduced to the pole data, J.of the Balkan Geophysical Society, 6, 66-74.
  • Bingöl, E., 1989, Türkiye jeoloji haritası, 1/2000000, MTA yayını, Ankara.
  • Blakely, R.J. and Simpson, R.W., 1986, Approximating edges of source bodies from magnetic or gravity anomalies, Gephysics 51, 1494-1498.
  • Blakely, R., 1995, Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications. Camb. Univ. P. New York.
  • Bournas ,N. and Baker, H.A., 2001, Interpretation of magnetic anomalies using the horizontal gradient analytic signal, Annali Di Geofisica 44, 505-526.
  • Fedi, M. and Florio, G., 2001, Detection of potential fields source boundaries by enhanced horizontal derivative method, Geophysical Prospecting, 49, 40-58.
  • Goodacre, A.K., 1973, Some comments on the Calculation of the gravitational and magnetic attraction of a homogeneous rectangular prism, Geophys. Prosp. 21, 66-69.
  • Hsu, S-K., Sibuet, J-C. and Shyu, C-T., 1996, High resolution detection of geologic boundaries from potential-field anomalies: An enhanced analytic signal technique, Geophysics, 61, 373-389.
  • Jeng, Y., Lee Y-L., Chen, C-Y. and Lin, M-J., 2003, Integrated signal enhancements in magnetic investigation in archaeology, J. of Appl. Geop. 53, 31-48.
  • Kadioglu, Y.K., Ates, A. and Gülec, N., 1998, Structural interpretation of gabbroic rocks in Agaçören Granitoid, Central Turkey: field observations and aeromagnetic data. Geol. Mag., 135, 245-254.
  • Kearey, P., 1977, Computer program "prism" to compute gravity and magnetic anomalies of right rectangular prism. University of Bristol, England (yayınlanmadı).
  • Mohan N.L. and Anand Babu, L., 1995, An analysis of 3-D analytic signal, Geophysics, 60, 531-536.
  • Nabighian, M.N., 1972, The analytic signal of two dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal crosssection: its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation, Geophysics, 37, 507-517.
  • Nabighian, M.N., 1974, Additional comments on the analytic signal of two dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section, Geophysics, 39, 85-92.
  • Nabighian, M.N. 1984, Toward a three-dimensional automatic interpretation of potential field data via generalized Hilbert transforms: Fundamental relations, Geophysics, 49, 780-786.
  • Reid, A.B., Allsop, J.M., Granser, H., Millett, A.J. and Somerton, I.W., 1990, Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution, Geophysics, 55, 80-91.
  • Roest, W.R., Verhoef, J. and Pilkington, M. 1992, Magnetic interpretation using 3D analytic signal, Geophysics, 57, 116-125.
  • Spector, A. and Grant, F.S. 1970, Statistical models for interpretation aeromagnetic data, Geophysics, 22, 359-383.
  • Thompson, D.T. 1982, EULDPH: A new tecnique for making computer-assisted depth estimates from magnetic data, Geophysics, 47, 31-3

Yıl 2005, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2, 151 - 162, 19.03.2012

Funda Bilim Abdullah Ateş

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Baldwin, R.T., and Langel, R., 1993, Tables and Maps of the DGRF 1985 and IGRF 1990, Internat Union of Geodesy and Geophysical Assoc. of Geomagnetic and Aeronomy, IAGA Bulletin, 54, 158.
  • Bilim, F. And Ates, A., 2003, Analytic signal inferred from reduced to the pole data, J.of the Balkan Geophysical Society, 6, 66-74.
  • Bingöl, E., 1989, Türkiye jeoloji haritası, 1/2000000, MTA yayını, Ankara.
  • Blakely, R.J. and Simpson, R.W., 1986, Approximating edges of source bodies from magnetic or gravity anomalies, Gephysics 51, 1494-1498.
  • Blakely, R., 1995, Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications. Camb. Univ. P. New York.
  • Bournas ,N. and Baker, H.A., 2001, Interpretation of magnetic anomalies using the horizontal gradient analytic signal, Annali Di Geofisica 44, 505-526.
  • Fedi, M. and Florio, G., 2001, Detection of potential fields source boundaries by enhanced horizontal derivative method, Geophysical Prospecting, 49, 40-58.
  • Goodacre, A.K., 1973, Some comments on the Calculation of the gravitational and magnetic attraction of a homogeneous rectangular prism, Geophys. Prosp. 21, 66-69.
  • Hsu, S-K., Sibuet, J-C. and Shyu, C-T., 1996, High resolution detection of geologic boundaries from potential-field anomalies: An enhanced analytic signal technique, Geophysics, 61, 373-389.
  • Jeng, Y., Lee Y-L., Chen, C-Y. and Lin, M-J., 2003, Integrated signal enhancements in magnetic investigation in archaeology, J. of Appl. Geop. 53, 31-48.
  • Kadioglu, Y.K., Ates, A. and Gülec, N., 1998, Structural interpretation of gabbroic rocks in Agaçören Granitoid, Central Turkey: field observations and aeromagnetic data. Geol. Mag., 135, 245-254.
  • Kearey, P., 1977, Computer program "prism" to compute gravity and magnetic anomalies of right rectangular prism. University of Bristol, England (yayınlanmadı).
  • Mohan N.L. and Anand Babu, L., 1995, An analysis of 3-D analytic signal, Geophysics, 60, 531-536.
  • Nabighian, M.N., 1972, The analytic signal of two dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal crosssection: its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation, Geophysics, 37, 507-517.
  • Nabighian, M.N., 1974, Additional comments on the analytic signal of two dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section, Geophysics, 39, 85-92.
  • Nabighian, M.N. 1984, Toward a three-dimensional automatic interpretation of potential field data via generalized Hilbert transforms: Fundamental relations, Geophysics, 49, 780-786.
  • Reid, A.B., Allsop, J.M., Granser, H., Millett, A.J. and Somerton, I.W., 1990, Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution, Geophysics, 55, 80-91.
  • Roest, W.R., Verhoef, J. and Pilkington, M. 1992, Magnetic interpretation using 3D analytic signal, Geophysics, 57, 116-125.
  • Spector, A. and Grant, F.S. 1970, Statistical models for interpretation aeromagnetic data, Geophysics, 22, 359-383.
  • Thompson, D.T. 1982, EULDPH: A new tecnique for making computer-assisted depth estimates from magnetic data, Geophysics, 47, 31-3
Toplam 20 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Funda Bilim Bu kişi benim

Abdullah Ateş Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 19 Mart 2012
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2005 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Bilim, F., & Ateş, A. (2012). Analitik Sinyal Yöntemlerinin Manyetik Model Verileri Üzerinde Karşılaştırılması ve Arazi Örneği. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi, 18(2), 151-162.
AMA Bilim F, Ateş A. Analitik Sinyal Yöntemlerinin Manyetik Model Verileri Üzerinde Karşılaştırılması ve Arazi Örneği. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi. Mart 2012;18(2):151-162.
Chicago Bilim, Funda, ve Abdullah Ateş. “Analitik Sinyal Yöntemlerinin Manyetik Model Verileri Üzerinde Karşılaştırılması Ve Arazi Örneği”. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi 18, sy. 2 (Mart 2012): 151-62.
EndNote Bilim F, Ateş A (01 Mart 2012) Analitik Sinyal Yöntemlerinin Manyetik Model Verileri Üzerinde Karşılaştırılması ve Arazi Örneği. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi 18 2 151–162.
IEEE F. Bilim ve A. Ateş, “Analitik Sinyal Yöntemlerinin Manyetik Model Verileri Üzerinde Karşılaştırılması ve Arazi Örneği”, İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi, c. 18, sy. 2, ss. 151–162, 2012.
ISNAD Bilim, Funda - Ateş, Abdullah. “Analitik Sinyal Yöntemlerinin Manyetik Model Verileri Üzerinde Karşılaştırılması Ve Arazi Örneği”. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi 18/2 (Mart 2012), 151-162.
JAMA Bilim F, Ateş A. Analitik Sinyal Yöntemlerinin Manyetik Model Verileri Üzerinde Karşılaştırılması ve Arazi Örneği. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi. 2012;18:151–162.
MLA Bilim, Funda ve Abdullah Ateş. “Analitik Sinyal Yöntemlerinin Manyetik Model Verileri Üzerinde Karşılaştırılması Ve Arazi Örneği”. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi, c. 18, sy. 2, 2012, ss. 151-62.
Vancouver Bilim F, Ateş A. Analitik Sinyal Yöntemlerinin Manyetik Model Verileri Üzerinde Karşılaştırılması ve Arazi Örneği. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi. 2012;18(2):151-62.