DETERMINING CONSUMERS' PREFERENCES FOR FISH CONSUMPTION: A STUDY IN ANTALYA PROVINCE OF TURKEY

Öz

It is clear that consumption of fishery products, which are important sources of food for meeting the nutritional needs of a rapidly growing population, is directly related to the development criteria of countries, such as awareness of proper nutrition and healthy living. However, Turkey as a developing country is still not benefiting sufficiently from aquatic products as human food despite being rich in water resources. In this context, this study was planned to determine socio-economic structures and fish consumption characteristics and habits of families living in city center of Antalya, one of the important cities of Turkey in terms of education, tourism, agriculture and fisheries. The study was performed during the years 2011-2012 and consisted of survey-derived data obtained from a total of 208 families living in 165 neighborhood residents in Konyaalti, Muratpasa and Kepez districts. The respondents were determined by a proportional stratified random sampling method. According to the survey results monthly fish consumption of the families was around 4.8 kg over the study period and 1.4 kg per capita. It was determined that first preference of the families was anchovy, followed by rainbow trout, farmed gilthead sea bream and Eurpean sea bass, mackerel and red sea bream in descending order. It was also determined that amount of fish consumption was directly proportional to family income status and education level. The most important impetus to consume fish was an opinion of fish being a healthy and delicious food with a high nutritional value.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

Kaynakça

1. Adıgüzel F, Civelek O, Sayılı M, Büyükbay EO, 2009, Fish consumption situation of families in Almus District of Tokat Province, Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaþa University 26, 35-43.
2. Aydın M, Karadurmuþ U, 2013, Consumption habits in Trabzon and Giresun Regions related to fishery products, The Black Sea Journal of Sciences
3. , 57-71.
4. Erdal G, Esengün K, 2008, Analysis with logit model of factors affecting fish consumption in Tokat, Ege University Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 25, 203-209.
5. FAO, 2012, The State of world fisheries and aquaculture 2012, FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, Available:http://www.fao.org/docrep/
6. /i2727e/i2727e00.htm. Accessed 20 September 2013.
7. Hatırlı SA, Demircan V, Aktaþ AR, 2004, Analysis of families’ fish consumption in Isparta Province, Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences 9, 245-256.
8. Orhan H, Yüksel O, 2010, Survey on consumption of fishery products in Burdur, Süleyman Demirel University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture

9. , 1-7.
10. Özkan B, Hatırlı SA, Yılmaz Ð, Öztürk E, Aktaþ AR, 2006, Analysis of consumers’ preferences on fish consumption and purchasing in Antalya, Turkish VII. Agricultural Economy Congress (13-15 September 2006, Antalya, Turkey), 2, 1200-1207.
11. Þen B, Canpolat Ö, Sevim AF, Sönmez F, 2008, Fish meat consumption in Elazı€, Science and Engineering Journal of Fırat University 20, 433-437.
12. Yamane T, 1967, Basic sampling methods (Translated By: Esin A, Aydın C, Bakır MA, Gürbüzsel E, 2001), Literature Pres. 509.
13. Yüksel F, Karaton-Kuzgun N, Özer EÐ, 2011, Identification of Fish Consumption Habit in Tunceli, The Black Sea Journal of Sciences 2, 28-36 .
14. TÜÐK 2013a. Family by statistics. 2012, TÜÐK News Bulletin Issue:13662 13 May 2013. Available:http://
15. www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.doid=13662. Accessed 24 October 2013.
16. TÜÐK 2013b. Household consumption expenditure. 2012, TÜÐK News Bulletin Issue: 13579
17. September 2013, Available: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/
18. PreHaberBultenleri.doid=13579. Accessed 24 October 2013.