Kısa Bildiri
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

THE ROLE OF MICROECONOMIC STUDIES IN DECISION-MAKING OF FISHERY MANAGEMENT

Yıl 2017, , 65 - 74, 08.02.2017
https://doi.org/10.3153/JAEFR17009

Öz

The need for fisheries management arises as the surplus production from fish stocks is overtaken by the catching  capacity of fishing fleets. In general, terms the goals in fisheries management can be divided into four subsets:  biological; ecological; economic and social, where social includes political and cultural goals. Identifying such goals is  important in clarifying how the fish resources are to be used to benefit society, both at the economic and policy  level. Without such goals, there is no guidance on how the fishery should be operated and managed. The study was  yielded some microeconomic analysis results such as value of gross output, variable and fixed costs, gross and net profit, average fishing income, non-fishing income and household income.



This research aimed at computing the income level of the fishermen, fishing of the Northern part of Turkey in the Sea of Marmara and examining the costprofit relationship with regard to vessel size. 231 vessels sorted with respect to  size and grouped under four classes. Stratified random sampling method was used to determine survey sample size.156 vessels from the first group, 46 from the second, 15 from the third, and 14 from the fourth group were included  into the survey.

Kaynakça

  • Akyol, O., Ceyhan, T. & Ünal, V. (2006). Marmara Bölgesi Su Ürünleri Kooperatif ve Derneklerinin Lüfer Balıkçılığındaki Rolleri. (Roles of Fisheries Cooperative Associations in the Marmara Region Bluefish Fishing). Ege Üniversitesi Su Ürünleri Dergisi, 23(3-4), 379-383.
  • Beşiktepe, Ş., Sur, H.İ., Özsoy, E., Latif, M.A., Oğuz, T. & Ünlüata, Ü. (1994). The Circulation and Hydrography of the Marmara Sea. Progress in Oceanography, 34(4), 285-334. doi: 10.1016/0079-6611(94)90018-3
  • Ceyhan, V. & Gene, H. (2014). Productive Efficiency of Commercial Fishing: Evidence from the Samsun Province of Black Sea, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 14, 309-320. doi:10.4194/1303-2712-v14_2_02
  • Colman, D. &Young, T. (1989), Principles of Agricultural Economics: Markets and Prices in Less Developed Countries (Wye Studies in Agricultural and Rural Development) Paperback-9 Feb 1989
  • Cochrane, K.L. (2002), A fishery manager’s guidebook. Management measures and their application. AO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 424. Rome, FAO. 2002. Pp.6-7.
  • Çelikkale, M.S., Düzgüneş E&Okumuş İ., (1999). Türkiye Su Ürünleri Sektörü (Turkey Fisheries Sector). Istanbul Chamber of Commerce Pub. No:2. Retrieved from http://www.ito.org.tr/itoyayin/0022768.pdf (accessed 5.4.2016)
  • Çeliker, A., Korkmaz, Ş., Demir, A., Gül, U., Dönmez, D., Demir, A. & Kalanlar, Ş. (2006). Karadeniz Bölgesi Su Ürünleri Avcılığının Sosyo-Ekonomik Analizi. (SocioEconomic Analysis of Fishery Products in Black Sea Region) Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Economic Research, 143, 122 p. Retrieved from http://www.tepge.gov.tr/upload/attachments/149.pdf
  • Daskalov, G., Cardinale, M., Zengin, M., Gümüş, A., Panayotova, M., Raykov, V., Radu, G., Valodia, M., Shlyakhov, Genç, Y., Düzgüneş, E.V., Yankova, M. & Mikhaylyuk, A. (2012). Expert Working Group Report. Assessment of Black Sea Stocks (EWG-12-16). Ispra, Milan, 08-12, October 2012, Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF), European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen. Retrieved from http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC67414/reqno_jrc67414_stecf-owp-11-06_black_sea_stock_assessments_jrc67414.pdf (accessed 5.4.2016).
  • FAO (2004). Manual Of Fisheries Sampling Surveys: Methodologies For Estimations Of Socio-Economic Indicators In The Mediterranean Sea, No.73. Retrieved from ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/006/y5228e/y5228e00.pdf (accessed 2.2.2014)
  • FAO (2014), The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture Opportunities and challenges 2014. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture FAO 2014, p.6-7. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3720e.pdf (accessed 10.2.2014)
  • Güngör, H., Zengin, M. & Güngör, G. (2007). Socio-Economic Structure of the Deep Water Pink Shrimp Fisheries in the Mar- mara Sea. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 4(3), 261-269.
  • Güngör, G., Güngör, H. & Şahin., S. (2007). Sosyo- Economic Structure of Fisheries and Mar- keting of Seafood Products in Turkey: A Case Study Along the Coastal Area of Tekirdağ Province. Journal of Agricultural Faculty, 4(3), 311-325.
  • Kıral, T., Kasnakoğlu, H., Tatlıdil, F.F., Fidan, H. & Gündoğmuş, E. (1999). Tarımsal Ürünler İçin Maliyet Hesaplama Metod- olojisi ve Veri Tabanı Rehberi (Methodol- ogy of Evaluating Costs for Agricultural Products and Guide to Database) TEAE Tarımsal Ekonomi Araştırma Enstitüsü (AERI Agricultural Economics Research Institute), Publication No: 37, ISBN 975- 407-051-2, Ankara, December
  • Kocataş, A., Koray, T., Kaya, M. & Kara, Ö.F. (1990). Review of the Fishery Resources and Environment in the Sea of Marmara. GFCM Studies and Reviews 64, Part 3, Rome, 87-143.
  • Polat, Ç. & Tuğrul, S. (1995). Nutrient and Organic Carbon Exchanges Between the Black Sea and Marmara Sea Through the Bosporus Strait. Continental Shelf Research, 15(9), (1115–1132). doi: 10.1016/0278-4343(94)00064-T
  • Rad, S. & Delioğlan, Ş., (2006). Taşucu’nda Trol Tekne Balıkçıları ve Sosyo-Ekonomik Göstergeler. (Trawler Fishermen and Socio-Economic Indicators in Tasucu). VII. Symopium of Agricultural Economics. Proceedings Book, Antalya, p. 1070-080.
  • Sabatella, E. & Franquesa, R. (2004). Manual of Fisheries Sampling Surveys: Methodologies for Estimations of Socio-Economic Indicators in the Mediterranean Sea, General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean, Studies and Reviews, no. 73, Rome. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/fi/oldsite/eims_search/1_dett.asp?lang=en&pub_id=151459
  • Seijo, J.C. & Caddy, J.F. (1999). Uncertainty in bio-economic reference points and indicators of marine fisheries. Sustainability indicators in marine capture fisheries. Special issue. Papers derived from a Technical Consultation organised by the Australian Department of Primary Industries and Energy in Cooperation with FAO, (Australia, 18-22 January 1999). In: Marine and Freshwater Research (Australia), 51(5), 477-483. doi:10.1071/MF99087
  • Sinclair, M. & Valdimarsson, G (2003). Responsible Fisheries in the Marine Ecosystem, Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Nova Scotia, Canada, 448 pages. doi: 10.1079/9780851996332.0000.
  • Turkish Statistical Institute (2011). Fisheries Statistics. Pub. No: 3876. Ankara. ISSN 1013-6177. ISBN 978-975-19-5371-1. Retrieved from http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/IcerikGetir.do?istab_id=52 (accessed 5.5.2016).
  • Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK) (2012). Fisheries Sta- tistics. Pub. No: 4119, Ankara. Retrieved from https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=97&locale=tr (accessed 8.3.2016).
  • Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK) (2013). Pub.No:4349,Retrieved from www.tuik.gov.tr/IcerikGetir.do?istab_id=52 (accessed 5.4.2016).
  • Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK) (2014). Fisheries Statistics. Retrieved from https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=97&locale=tr (accessed 12.25.2014).
  • Republic of Turkey Ministry Of Food, Agrıculture And Livestock. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.tarim.gov.tr/sgb/Belgeler/SagMenuVeriler/BSGM.pdf (accessed 4.1.2016).
  • Ubak (2016). ÖTV’siz Yakıt Uygulamaları, Deniz Ticareti Genel Müdürlüğü, Retrieved from http://www.ubak.gov.tr/BLSM_WIYS/DISGM/tr/doc/20130313_164012_66968_1_67502.pdf (accessed 5.2.2016)
  • Uras, G. (2014). “Balıkçı Borç Tuzağında.” (Fishermen in the debt trap) Milliyet Newspaper, Economics page, Retrieved from http://www.milliyet.com.tr/balikci-borc-tuzaginda/ekonomi/ydetay/1907534/default.htm (accessed 6.7. 2014).
  • Ünal, V., (2004). Viability of trawl fishing fleet in Foca (the Aegean Sea), Turkey and some advice to central management authority. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 14 4:, 91–95. Retrieved from http://www.trjfas.org/uploads/pdf_236.pdf (accessed.2.5.2016).
  • Yamane, T. (2001), Temel Örnekleme Yöntemleri (Basic Sampling Methods), Literatür Yayıncılık, Translated by Gazi University, Science and Literature Faculty, Deptartment of Statistics, (Alptekin Esin, Celal Aydın, M.Akif Bakır, Esen Gürbüzsel). ISBN:975-8431-34-X, İstanbul.
Yıl 2017, , 65 - 74, 08.02.2017
https://doi.org/10.3153/JAEFR17009

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Akyol, O., Ceyhan, T. & Ünal, V. (2006). Marmara Bölgesi Su Ürünleri Kooperatif ve Derneklerinin Lüfer Balıkçılığındaki Rolleri. (Roles of Fisheries Cooperative Associations in the Marmara Region Bluefish Fishing). Ege Üniversitesi Su Ürünleri Dergisi, 23(3-4), 379-383.
  • Beşiktepe, Ş., Sur, H.İ., Özsoy, E., Latif, M.A., Oğuz, T. & Ünlüata, Ü. (1994). The Circulation and Hydrography of the Marmara Sea. Progress in Oceanography, 34(4), 285-334. doi: 10.1016/0079-6611(94)90018-3
  • Ceyhan, V. & Gene, H. (2014). Productive Efficiency of Commercial Fishing: Evidence from the Samsun Province of Black Sea, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 14, 309-320. doi:10.4194/1303-2712-v14_2_02
  • Colman, D. &Young, T. (1989), Principles of Agricultural Economics: Markets and Prices in Less Developed Countries (Wye Studies in Agricultural and Rural Development) Paperback-9 Feb 1989
  • Cochrane, K.L. (2002), A fishery manager’s guidebook. Management measures and their application. AO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 424. Rome, FAO. 2002. Pp.6-7.
  • Çelikkale, M.S., Düzgüneş E&Okumuş İ., (1999). Türkiye Su Ürünleri Sektörü (Turkey Fisheries Sector). Istanbul Chamber of Commerce Pub. No:2. Retrieved from http://www.ito.org.tr/itoyayin/0022768.pdf (accessed 5.4.2016)
  • Çeliker, A., Korkmaz, Ş., Demir, A., Gül, U., Dönmez, D., Demir, A. & Kalanlar, Ş. (2006). Karadeniz Bölgesi Su Ürünleri Avcılığının Sosyo-Ekonomik Analizi. (SocioEconomic Analysis of Fishery Products in Black Sea Region) Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Economic Research, 143, 122 p. Retrieved from http://www.tepge.gov.tr/upload/attachments/149.pdf
  • Daskalov, G., Cardinale, M., Zengin, M., Gümüş, A., Panayotova, M., Raykov, V., Radu, G., Valodia, M., Shlyakhov, Genç, Y., Düzgüneş, E.V., Yankova, M. & Mikhaylyuk, A. (2012). Expert Working Group Report. Assessment of Black Sea Stocks (EWG-12-16). Ispra, Milan, 08-12, October 2012, Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF), European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen. Retrieved from http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC67414/reqno_jrc67414_stecf-owp-11-06_black_sea_stock_assessments_jrc67414.pdf (accessed 5.4.2016).
  • FAO (2004). Manual Of Fisheries Sampling Surveys: Methodologies For Estimations Of Socio-Economic Indicators In The Mediterranean Sea, No.73. Retrieved from ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/006/y5228e/y5228e00.pdf (accessed 2.2.2014)
  • FAO (2014), The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture Opportunities and challenges 2014. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture FAO 2014, p.6-7. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3720e.pdf (accessed 10.2.2014)
  • Güngör, H., Zengin, M. & Güngör, G. (2007). Socio-Economic Structure of the Deep Water Pink Shrimp Fisheries in the Mar- mara Sea. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 4(3), 261-269.
  • Güngör, G., Güngör, H. & Şahin., S. (2007). Sosyo- Economic Structure of Fisheries and Mar- keting of Seafood Products in Turkey: A Case Study Along the Coastal Area of Tekirdağ Province. Journal of Agricultural Faculty, 4(3), 311-325.
  • Kıral, T., Kasnakoğlu, H., Tatlıdil, F.F., Fidan, H. & Gündoğmuş, E. (1999). Tarımsal Ürünler İçin Maliyet Hesaplama Metod- olojisi ve Veri Tabanı Rehberi (Methodol- ogy of Evaluating Costs for Agricultural Products and Guide to Database) TEAE Tarımsal Ekonomi Araştırma Enstitüsü (AERI Agricultural Economics Research Institute), Publication No: 37, ISBN 975- 407-051-2, Ankara, December
  • Kocataş, A., Koray, T., Kaya, M. & Kara, Ö.F. (1990). Review of the Fishery Resources and Environment in the Sea of Marmara. GFCM Studies and Reviews 64, Part 3, Rome, 87-143.
  • Polat, Ç. & Tuğrul, S. (1995). Nutrient and Organic Carbon Exchanges Between the Black Sea and Marmara Sea Through the Bosporus Strait. Continental Shelf Research, 15(9), (1115–1132). doi: 10.1016/0278-4343(94)00064-T
  • Rad, S. & Delioğlan, Ş., (2006). Taşucu’nda Trol Tekne Balıkçıları ve Sosyo-Ekonomik Göstergeler. (Trawler Fishermen and Socio-Economic Indicators in Tasucu). VII. Symopium of Agricultural Economics. Proceedings Book, Antalya, p. 1070-080.
  • Sabatella, E. & Franquesa, R. (2004). Manual of Fisheries Sampling Surveys: Methodologies for Estimations of Socio-Economic Indicators in the Mediterranean Sea, General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean, Studies and Reviews, no. 73, Rome. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/fi/oldsite/eims_search/1_dett.asp?lang=en&pub_id=151459
  • Seijo, J.C. & Caddy, J.F. (1999). Uncertainty in bio-economic reference points and indicators of marine fisheries. Sustainability indicators in marine capture fisheries. Special issue. Papers derived from a Technical Consultation organised by the Australian Department of Primary Industries and Energy in Cooperation with FAO, (Australia, 18-22 January 1999). In: Marine and Freshwater Research (Australia), 51(5), 477-483. doi:10.1071/MF99087
  • Sinclair, M. & Valdimarsson, G (2003). Responsible Fisheries in the Marine Ecosystem, Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Nova Scotia, Canada, 448 pages. doi: 10.1079/9780851996332.0000.
  • Turkish Statistical Institute (2011). Fisheries Statistics. Pub. No: 3876. Ankara. ISSN 1013-6177. ISBN 978-975-19-5371-1. Retrieved from http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/IcerikGetir.do?istab_id=52 (accessed 5.5.2016).
  • Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK) (2012). Fisheries Sta- tistics. Pub. No: 4119, Ankara. Retrieved from https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=97&locale=tr (accessed 8.3.2016).
  • Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK) (2013). Pub.No:4349,Retrieved from www.tuik.gov.tr/IcerikGetir.do?istab_id=52 (accessed 5.4.2016).
  • Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK) (2014). Fisheries Statistics. Retrieved from https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=97&locale=tr (accessed 12.25.2014).
  • Republic of Turkey Ministry Of Food, Agrıculture And Livestock. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.tarim.gov.tr/sgb/Belgeler/SagMenuVeriler/BSGM.pdf (accessed 4.1.2016).
  • Ubak (2016). ÖTV’siz Yakıt Uygulamaları, Deniz Ticareti Genel Müdürlüğü, Retrieved from http://www.ubak.gov.tr/BLSM_WIYS/DISGM/tr/doc/20130313_164012_66968_1_67502.pdf (accessed 5.2.2016)
  • Uras, G. (2014). “Balıkçı Borç Tuzağında.” (Fishermen in the debt trap) Milliyet Newspaper, Economics page, Retrieved from http://www.milliyet.com.tr/balikci-borc-tuzaginda/ekonomi/ydetay/1907534/default.htm (accessed 6.7. 2014).
  • Ünal, V., (2004). Viability of trawl fishing fleet in Foca (the Aegean Sea), Turkey and some advice to central management authority. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 14 4:, 91–95. Retrieved from http://www.trjfas.org/uploads/pdf_236.pdf (accessed.2.5.2016).
  • Yamane, T. (2001), Temel Örnekleme Yöntemleri (Basic Sampling Methods), Literatür Yayıncılık, Translated by Gazi University, Science and Literature Faculty, Deptartment of Statistics, (Alptekin Esin, Celal Aydın, M.Akif Bakır, Esen Gürbüzsel). ISBN:975-8431-34-X, İstanbul.
Toplam 28 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Konular Hidrobiyoloji
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Günay Güngör Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 8 Şubat 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2017

Kaynak Göster

APA Güngör, G. (2017). THE ROLE OF MICROECONOMIC STUDIES IN DECISION-MAKING OF FISHERY MANAGEMENT. Journal of Aquaculture Engineering and Fisheries Research, 3(2), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.3153/JAEFR17009
AMA Güngör G. THE ROLE OF MICROECONOMIC STUDIES IN DECISION-MAKING OF FISHERY MANAGEMENT. J Aquacult Eng Fish Res. Nisan 2017;3(2):65-74. doi:10.3153/JAEFR17009
Chicago Güngör, Günay. “THE ROLE OF MICROECONOMIC STUDIES IN DECISION-MAKING OF FISHERY MANAGEMENT”. Journal of Aquaculture Engineering and Fisheries Research 3, sy. 2 (Nisan 2017): 65-74. https://doi.org/10.3153/JAEFR17009.
EndNote Güngör G (01 Nisan 2017) THE ROLE OF MICROECONOMIC STUDIES IN DECISION-MAKING OF FISHERY MANAGEMENT. Journal of Aquaculture Engineering and Fisheries Research 3 2 65–74.
IEEE G. Güngör, “THE ROLE OF MICROECONOMIC STUDIES IN DECISION-MAKING OF FISHERY MANAGEMENT”, J Aquacult Eng Fish Res, c. 3, sy. 2, ss. 65–74, 2017, doi: 10.3153/JAEFR17009.
ISNAD Güngör, Günay. “THE ROLE OF MICROECONOMIC STUDIES IN DECISION-MAKING OF FISHERY MANAGEMENT”. Journal of Aquaculture Engineering and Fisheries Research 3/2 (Nisan 2017), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.3153/JAEFR17009.
JAMA Güngör G. THE ROLE OF MICROECONOMIC STUDIES IN DECISION-MAKING OF FISHERY MANAGEMENT. J Aquacult Eng Fish Res. 2017;3:65–74.
MLA Güngör, Günay. “THE ROLE OF MICROECONOMIC STUDIES IN DECISION-MAKING OF FISHERY MANAGEMENT”. Journal of Aquaculture Engineering and Fisheries Research, c. 3, sy. 2, 2017, ss. 65-74, doi:10.3153/JAEFR17009.
Vancouver Güngör G. THE ROLE OF MICROECONOMIC STUDIES IN DECISION-MAKING OF FISHERY MANAGEMENT. J Aquacult Eng Fish Res. 2017;3(2):65-74.