Kısa Bildiri

THE ROLE OF MICROECONOMIC STUDIES IN DECISION-MAKING OF FISHERY MANAGEMENT

Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2 8 Şubat 2017
  • Günay Güngör
PDF İndir
EN

THE ROLE OF MICROECONOMIC STUDIES IN DECISION-MAKING OF FISHERY MANAGEMENT

Abstract

The need for fisheries management arises as the surplus production from fish stocks is overtaken by the catching  capacity of fishing fleets. In general, terms the goals in fisheries management can be divided into four subsets:  biological; ecological; economic and social, where social includes political and cultural goals. Identifying such goals is  important in clarifying how the fish resources are to be used to benefit society, both at the economic and policy  level. Without such goals, there is no guidance on how the fishery should be operated and managed. The study was  yielded some microeconomic analysis results such as value of gross output, variable and fixed costs, gross and net profit, average fishing income, non-fishing income and household income.

This research aimed at computing the income level of the fishermen, fishing of the Northern part of Turkey in the Sea of Marmara and examining the costprofit relationship with regard to vessel size. 231 vessels sorted with respect to  size and grouped under four classes. Stratified random sampling method was used to determine survey sample size.156 vessels from the first group, 46 from the second, 15 from the third, and 14 from the fourth group were included  into the survey.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Akyol, O., Ceyhan, T. & Ünal, V. (2006). Marmara Bölgesi Su Ürünleri Kooperatif ve Derneklerinin Lüfer Balıkçılığındaki Rolleri. (Roles of Fisheries Cooperative Associations in the Marmara Region Bluefish Fishing). Ege Üniversitesi Su Ürünleri Dergisi, 23(3-4), 379-383.
  2. Beşiktepe, Ş., Sur, H.İ., Özsoy, E., Latif, M.A., Oğuz, T. & Ünlüata, Ü. (1994). The Circulation and Hydrography of the Marmara Sea. Progress in Oceanography, 34(4), 285-334. doi: 10.1016/0079-6611(94)90018-3
  3. Ceyhan, V. & Gene, H. (2014). Productive Efficiency of Commercial Fishing: Evidence from the Samsun Province of Black Sea, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 14, 309-320. doi:10.4194/1303-2712-v14_2_02
  4. Colman, D. &Young, T. (1989), Principles of Agricultural Economics: Markets and Prices in Less Developed Countries (Wye Studies in Agricultural and Rural Development) Paperback-9 Feb 1989
  5. Cochrane, K.L. (2002), A fishery manager’s guidebook. Management measures and their application. AO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 424. Rome, FAO. 2002. Pp.6-7.
  6. Çelikkale, M.S., Düzgüneş E&Okumuş İ., (1999). Türkiye Su Ürünleri Sektörü (Turkey Fisheries Sector). Istanbul Chamber of Commerce Pub. No:2. Retrieved from http://www.ito.org.tr/itoyayin/0022768.pdf (accessed 5.4.2016)
  7. Çeliker, A., Korkmaz, Ş., Demir, A., Gül, U., Dönmez, D., Demir, A. & Kalanlar, Ş. (2006). Karadeniz Bölgesi Su Ürünleri Avcılığının Sosyo-Ekonomik Analizi. (SocioEconomic Analysis of Fishery Products in Black Sea Region) Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Economic Research, 143, 122 p. Retrieved from http://www.tepge.gov.tr/upload/attachments/149.pdf
  8. Daskalov, G., Cardinale, M., Zengin, M., Gümüş, A., Panayotova, M., Raykov, V., Radu, G., Valodia, M., Shlyakhov, Genç, Y., Düzgüneş, E.V., Yankova, M. & Mikhaylyuk, A. (2012). Expert Working Group Report. Assessment of Black Sea Stocks (EWG-12-16). Ispra, Milan, 08-12, October 2012, Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF), European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen. Retrieved from http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC67414/reqno_jrc67414_stecf-owp-11-06_black_sea_stock_assessments_jrc67414.pdf (accessed 5.4.2016).

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Hidrobiyoloji

Bölüm

Kısa Bildiri

Yazarlar

Günay Güngör Bu kişi benim
NAMIK KEMAL UNIV
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

8 Şubat 2017

Gönderilme Tarihi

11 Temmuz 2016

Kabul Tarihi

1 Aralık 2016

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2017 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Güngör, G. (2017). THE ROLE OF MICROECONOMIC STUDIES IN DECISION-MAKING OF FISHERY MANAGEMENT. Journal of Aquaculture Engineering and Fisheries Research, 3(2), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.3153/JAEFR17009
AMA
1.Güngör G. THE ROLE OF MICROECONOMIC STUDIES IN DECISION-MAKING OF FISHERY MANAGEMENT. J Aquacult Eng Fish Res. 2017;3(2):65-74. doi:10.3153/JAEFR17009
Chicago
Güngör, Günay. 2017. “THE ROLE OF MICROECONOMIC STUDIES IN DECISION-MAKING OF FISHERY MANAGEMENT”. Journal of Aquaculture Engineering and Fisheries Research 3 (2): 65-74. https://doi.org/10.3153/JAEFR17009.
EndNote
Güngör G (01 Nisan 2017) THE ROLE OF MICROECONOMIC STUDIES IN DECISION-MAKING OF FISHERY MANAGEMENT. Journal of Aquaculture Engineering and Fisheries Research 3 2 65–74.
IEEE
[1]G. Güngör, “THE ROLE OF MICROECONOMIC STUDIES IN DECISION-MAKING OF FISHERY MANAGEMENT”, J Aquacult Eng Fish Res, c. 3, sy 2, ss. 65–74, Nis. 2017, doi: 10.3153/JAEFR17009.
ISNAD
Güngör, Günay. “THE ROLE OF MICROECONOMIC STUDIES IN DECISION-MAKING OF FISHERY MANAGEMENT”. Journal of Aquaculture Engineering and Fisheries Research 3/2 (01 Nisan 2017): 65-74. https://doi.org/10.3153/JAEFR17009.
JAMA
1.Güngör G. THE ROLE OF MICROECONOMIC STUDIES IN DECISION-MAKING OF FISHERY MANAGEMENT. J Aquacult Eng Fish Res. 2017;3:65–74.
MLA
Güngör, Günay. “THE ROLE OF MICROECONOMIC STUDIES IN DECISION-MAKING OF FISHERY MANAGEMENT”. Journal of Aquaculture Engineering and Fisheries Research, c. 3, sy 2, Nisan 2017, ss. 65-74, doi:10.3153/JAEFR17009.
Vancouver
1.Günay Güngör. THE ROLE OF MICROECONOMIC STUDIES IN DECISION-MAKING OF FISHERY MANAGEMENT. J Aquacult Eng Fish Res. 01 Nisan 2017;3(2):65-74. doi:10.3153/JAEFR17009