LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIP OF SPINY EEL Macrognathus pancalus (Hamilton-Buchanan) FROM UPPER ASSAM, INDIA

Abstract

Length-weight relationship of Macrognathus pancalus had been carried out from two different waterbodies of upper Assam during 2009-2011. The pool data for the co-efficient of regression (b) was recorded as 1.408 in juveniles; 2.977 in males; 3.034 in females. It reveals that females have better growth than males and juvenile. The ‘b’ for males was found to be minimum (1.408) in 6-9 cm and maximum (3.024) in15-18 cm whereas, for females the lowest (1.807) in 9-12 cm and highest (3.202) in >15 cm groups. In different seasons, the ‘b’ value ranged from 2.982 (pre-monsoon) to 3.253 (winter) for males while for females, from 2.825 (post-monsoon) to 3.571 (winter). It indicates that both the sexes did not follow the cube law (b=3). The higher condition factor ‘K’ for males (4.622) and females (4.362) were observed in 9-12 cm and lower values for males (4.128) and for females (3.961) were recorded in 12-15 cm and >15 cm length group. The maximum (4.282) and minimum (3.686) of ‘K’ for males were recorded in post monsoon and pre-monsoon while in female, the maximum (4.376) in monsoon and minimum (3.913) in winter. It reveals that the species were in good conditions. The ‘r’ values for in all cases were found to be highly correlated between length and weight. 

Keywords

• Macrognathus pancalus,Length-weight,Condition factor,Assam,India

Kaynakça

1. Abujam, S.K.S., & Biswas, S.P., (2014). Length-Weight relationship and Condition factor of spiny eel Macrognathus aral from upper Assam, India. International Journal of Current Life Sciences, 4(3), 605-611.
2. Ahirrao, S.D., (2008). Length-weight relationship of fresh water spiny eel Mastacembelus armatus (Lace’pede) from Marathwada region. Ecology Environment and Conservation, 14(1), 71-72.
3. Ali, S.S., (1999). Fresh Water Fishery Biology. Naseem Book Depot, Hyderabad. 330p.
4. Anyanwu, P.E., Okoro, B.C., Anyanwu, A.O., Matanmi, M.A., Ebonwu, B.I., Ayaobu-Cookey, I.K., Hamzat, M.B., Ihimekpen, F., & Afolabi, S.E., (2007). Length-weight relationship, condition factor and sex ratio of African mudcatfish (Clarias gariepinus) reared in indoor water recirculation system tanks. Research Journal of Biological Sciences, 2(7), 780-783.
5. Bagenal, T.B., & Tesch, A.T., (1978a). Conditions and Growth Patterns in Fresh Water Habitats. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
6. Bagenal, T.B., & Tesch, F.W., (1978). Age and Growth patterns in fresh water habitats. 101-136. In: methods for assessment of fish production in freshwater. 3rd Edi T. B. Bagenal (ed.). IBP Handbook No.3. Blackwell Scientific Pub. Ltd. Oxford.
7. Bashirullah, A.K.N., (1975). Biology of Lutjanus griseus (L.) of the Cubagua Island, Venezuela. 1. Lemgth-weight, Body length-gut length relationships and condition factor. Boletin Institute Oceanography University Oriente, 14(1), 101-107.
8. Bhatnagar, G.K., (1972). Maturity, fecundity, spawning season and certain related aspects of Labeo fimbriatus (Bloch) of river Narmada near Hoshangabad. Journal of Inland Fisheries Society of India, 4, 26-37.

9. Braga, F.M.D.S., (1986). Study between condition factor and length/weight relation for some marine fishes. Revista Brasileira de Biologia, 46(2), 339-346.
10. Carlander, D.K., (1970). Handbook of Freshwater Fishery Biology. Vol. I, The Iowa State Univ. Press, Amer. Iowa.
11. Cherif, M., Zarrad, R., Gharbi, H., Missaoui, H., & Jarboui, O., (2008). Length-weight relationships for 11 fish species from the Gulf of Tunis (SW Mediterranean Sea, Tunisia). Pan-American Journal of Aquatic Sciences, 3(1), 1-5.
12. Dasgupta, M., (1991). Length-weight relationship and condition factor (K-value) of Tor putitora (Ham.) from Garo Hills, Meghalaya. Indian Journal of Fisheries, 38(1), 35-38.
13. Desai, V.R., (1973). Studies on fisher and biology of Tor tor (Ham.) from river Narbada. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy, 39(2), 228-248.
14. Entsua-Mensah, M., Osei-Abunyewa, A., & Palomares, M.L.D., (1995). Length-weight relationships of fishes from tributaries of the Vola River, Ghana: Part I. Analysis of pooled data sets. Naga, The ICLARM Quarterly, 18(1), 36-38.
15. Fagade, S.O., (1979). Ovservation of the biology of two species of Tilapia from the Lagos lagoo Nigeria. Bulletin de l'Institut fondamental d'Afrique noire, 41: 627-658.
16. Froese, R., & Binohlan, C., (2000). Empirical relationships to estimate asymptotic length, length at first maturity and length at maximum yield per recruit in fishes, with a simple method to evaluate length frequency data. Journal of Fish Biology, 56, 758-773. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2000.tb00870.x
17. Froese R., & Pauly D., (2006). Fish base, World-wide Web Electronic Publication. http://www.fishbase.org
18. Gayanilo, F.C., & Pauly, D., (1997). FAO ICLARM stock assessment tools (FISAT): References manual, FAO Computerzed information series (Fisheries), 8, 262 pp.
19. Goncalves, J.M.S., Bente, L., Lino, P.G., Ribeiro, J., Canario, A.V.M., & Erzini, K., (1997). Weight-length relationships for selected fish species of the small-scale demersal fisheries of the south and south-west coast of Portugal. Fisheries Research, 30, 253-256. doi:10.1016/S0165-7836(96)00569-3
20. Hamoivici, M., & Velasco, G., (2000). Length-weight relationship of marine fishes from Southern Brazil. Naga, The ICLARM Quarterly, 23: 19-23.
21. Hossain, M.Y., Ahmed, Z.F., Leunda, P. M., Islam, A.K.M.R., Jasmine1, S., Oscoz, J. Miranda, R., & Ohtomi, J., (2006). Length–weight and length–length relationships of some small indigenous fish species from the Mathabhanga River, southwestern Bangladesh. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22, 301-303. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00801.x
22. Jhingran, V.G., (1972). Fluctuation in the ponderal index of the gangetica ancovy Setipinna phasa (Ham.) and interpretation of ‘Salmonids bands’ and spawning marks. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy, (B), 37(4),1-62.
23. Khan, M.A., (1988). Biology of Labeo calbasu (Ham.) from Tilaiya reservoir Bihar, Length-weight relationship, condition index and feeding habits. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy, (B), 58(1), 41-47.
24. Khan, R.A., (1972). Studies on the biology of some important major carps. Ph.D. Thesis, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh.
25. Kulshrestha, S.K., Srivastava, M., George, M.P., Saxena, R., & Tiwari, A. (1993). Length-weight relationship of a major carp, Catla catla (Ham.) from two waterbodies of Bhopal, pp. 329-332 In: Advances in Limnology (Ed.) H. R. Singh, Narendra Publishing House, Delhi.
26. Lakshmanan, M.V., (1967). Survival and growth of cultivated fishes in Assam ponds. Indian Journal of Fisheries, 14(1&2), 1-23.
27. Lazarus, R.J., & Reddy, P.S.R. (1986). On the length-weight relationship of the little known lesser spiny eel, Macrognathus aculeatus (Bloch) (Pisces: Mastacembelidae). Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Science (Anim. Sci.), 95(4), 423-427.
28. LeCren, E.D. (1951). The length-weight relationship and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in perch. Journal of Animal Ecology, 20: 201-219.
29. Narejo, N.T., Rahmatullah, S.M., & Rashid, M.M., (2002). Studies on the reproductive biology of freshwater spiny eel, Mastacembelus armatus (Lacepede) reared in the cemented cisterns of BAU, Mymensingh, Bangladesh. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 5(7), 809-811.
30. Narejo, N.T., Rahmatullah, S.M., & Rashid, M.M., (2003). Length-weight relationship and relative condition factor (Kn) of a freshwater spiny eel, Mastacembalus armatus (Lacepede) from Mymensingh, Bangladesh. Indian Journal of Fisheries, 50(1), 81-87.
31. Nelson, J.S., (1994). Fishes of the world, 3rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, INC, New York, 600 p.
32. Oymak, S.A., Kirankaya, S.G., & Dogan, N., (2009). Growth and reproduction of Mesopotamian spiny eel (Mastacembelus mastacembelus Banks & Solander, 1794) in Ataturk Dam Lake (Sanliurfa), Turkey. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 25, 488-490. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2009.01234.x
33. Pathak, S.C., (1975). Length-weight relationship, condition factor and study of Labeo calbasu (Ham.) from Loni reservoir (M. P.). Journal of Inland Fisheries Society of India, 8, 58-64.
34. Pauly, D., (1983). Some simple methods for the assessment of tropical fish stocks. FAO Fish. Fisheries Technical Paper, 243-253.
35. Pauly, D., (1984). Fish population dynamics in tropical waters: A manual for use with programmable calculators. ICLARM, Studies and Review, 8-325 p.
36. Pauly, D., (1993). Fishbyte section editorial. Naga, The ICLARM Quarterly, 16, 26.
37. Pazira, A., Abdoli, A., Koughgardi, E., & Yousefifard, P., (2005). Age structure and growth of the Mesopotamian spiny eel, Mastacembelus mastacembelus (Banks & Solander in Russel, 1794) (Mastacembelidae), in southern Iran. Zoology in The Middle East, 35, 43-47.
38. Petrakis, G., & Stergiou, K.I., (1995). Weight-length relationships for 33 fish species in Greeek waters. Fisheries Research, 21(3&4): 465-469. doi:10.1016/0165-7836(94)00294-7.
39. Rao, G.R.M., & Rao, L.M., (1972). On the biology of Labeo calbasu (Ham.) from the river Godavari. Journal of Inland Fisheries Society of India, 4, 74-86.
40. Ricker, W.E., (1973). Linear regressions in fishery research. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 30, 409-434. doi: 10.1139/f73-072.
41. Ritcher, H.C., Luckstadt, C., Focken, U., & Becker, K., (2000). An improved procedure to assess fish condition on the basis of length-weight relationships. Archive of Fishery and Marine Research, 48, 255-264.
42. Serajuddin, M., (2005). Length-weight relationship of freshwater spiny eel, Mastacembelus armatus (Lacepede) from Aligarh region, Uttar Pradesh, India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India, (B), 75(1), 13-18.
43. Sparre, P., (1992). Introduction to Tropical Fish Stock Assessment. Part I Manual. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 306/1. Rev 1, Rome, 376 p.
44. Sugunan, V.V., Mitra K, & Vinci, G.K., (2002). Ornamental fishes of West Bengal. Classic Printers, Kolkata, India.
45. Talwar, P.K., & Jhingran, A.G., (1991). Inland Fishes of India and Adjacent Countries. Vol. 2. Oxford and IBH Publishing, New Delhi, Bombay, Calcutta.
46. Tesch, F.W., (1968). Age and growth, 98-130 p. In: W. R. Ricker (ed.) Methods for the Assessment of fish Production in Freshwater.
47. Thakur, N.K., & Das, N.K., (1974). Length-weight relationship of Heteropneustes fossilis (Bloch). Journal of Inland Fisheries Society of India, 6, 95-96.
48. Tripathi S.D., (2004). Ornamental fishes: Breeding, culture and trade. 17-42 p. In: Das R. C., Sinha A., Datta S., Ghose S. (ed.) Proceeding of the National Seminar on Prospects of Ornamental Fish Breeding and Culture in Eastern and Northeastern India. Central Institute of Fisheries Education, (ICAR), Kolkata, India.
49. Vazzoler, A.E., (1996). Biologia da reproducao de peixes teleosteos: Teoria e pratica. Maringa: EDUEM. Sao Paulo: SBI., 169 pp.
50. Welcomme, R.L., (1979). Fisheries Ecology of Flood Plain Rivers. Longman Press, London, 317 pp.
51. Wooton, R.J., (1992). Fish ecology. Tertiary level biology. Blackies. New York, 212 pp.
52. Yousuf, A.R., Firdous, G., Bhalki, M.H., & Pandit, A.K. (1992). Studies on length-weight relationship in some cyprinid fish in Manasbal lake, Kashmir, 185-189 p. In: A. F. Yousuf, M. K. Raina, and M. Y. Qadri, (ed.) Current trend in fish and fishery biology and aquatic ecology. Univ. of Kashmir, Srinagar, India.