Genetically modified organisms and biosafety as perceived by professionals according to their sociodemographic characteristics
Abstract
While the cultivation of modern biotechnology products was adopted by producers very fast, the consumer acceptance of these products has not evolved at the same pace. Despite multiple benefits associated with genetically modified organisms (GMO), some potential risks related to the environment, health and economy have increased concerns and affected consumer confidence. This article examines the relationship between knowledge and confidence levels for biosafety and GMOs, and the sociodemographic characteristics of professionals working in the fields of food, agriculture and veterinary medicine, with a view to assess their perception. Questionnaires were applied to 261 individuals, selected by the proportional sampling method among professionals, the numbers of whom were obtained from the relevant unions and chambers. Then frequency, percentage distribution and factor analyses were carried out on data obtained. In conclusion food engineering professionals, men and more knowledgeable participants in biotechnology were found to have a more positive approach towards GMOs and more confidence in the biosafety system. It is indisputable that the scientific knowledge is essential for a reliable biosafety mechanism. Therefore, the inclusion of courses on GMOs and biosafety into curricula and planning in-service trainings may significantly contribute to the development of scientific knowledge thus, improving attitudes towards GMOs.
Keywords
Biosafety, Food biotechnology, GMO trust and confidence, GMO knowledge, Consumer perception
References
- Adana, F., Gezer, N., & Ogut, S. (2014). Knowledge and Opinions of the Health School Students About Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs). Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(September 2014), 276–280. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279848624%0ASağlık (in Turkish)
- Akbudak, M. A., & Kontbay, K. (2017). New Generation Genome Editing Techniques: ZFNs, TALENs, CRISPRs and Their Use in Plant Research Abstract. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 26(1), 111–111. https://doi.org/10.21566/tarbitderg.323614 (in Turkish)
- Akdag M (2011). Statistical Analysis in SPSS. Lecture Notes, Malatya. İnonu.edu.tr. (Access Date: 04.12.2021). (in Turkish)
- Aksoy, A., & Yavuz, F. (2012). Analysis on the Reasons for Quitting Sheep Aand Goat Rearing of Farmers: A Case of East Anatolia Region. Anadolu Tarım Bilim. Derg., 27(2), 76–79. https://doi.org/10.7161/anajas.2012.272.76 (in Turkish)
- Aksu, S. (2019). Legal Liability for a Genetically Modified Organism and Its Products [Dokuz Eylül University Graduate]. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=bQF6MSOhc5untxZ0AdqnBg&no=YNjdmC52k13iw8BkMMcurA PhD Thesis (in Turkish)
- Aleksejeva, I. (2014). EU Experts’ Attitude Towards Use of GMO in Food and Feed and Other Industries. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 494–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.893
- Ates, Z. G. (2020). Biyogüvenlik Kanunu Çerçevesinde Hukuki Sorumluluk (Issue February) [İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi]. Ph.D thesis https://acikerisim.iku.edu.tr/bitstream/handle/11413/6443/ZehraGizemAteşDRTez.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (in Turkish)
- Atikcan, D. T., Bulbul, A., Coskun, O., Cakmak, I. B., Ozkan, O. C., Tas, O., & Dnş:Durukan, E. (2011). Toplumun Genetiği Değiştirilmiş Ürünlerle İlgili Bilgi Düzeyleri ve Bu Ürünleri Kabul Ederlik Durumu. Başkent Ünv. Sempozyumu, 12–3, 2015. https://silo.tips/download/toplumun-genet-detrlm-rnlerle-lgl-blg-dzey-ve-bu-rnler-kabul-ederlk-durumu (in Turkish)
- Baykan, B. G., & Ertunc, B. (2012). Türkiye’nin Üç Bölgesinde GDO Farkındalığı. Bahçeşehir Ünv. Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Araş. Merk. Betam Araştırma Notu 12/136. (in Turkish)
- Biosafety Law (2010). Biosafety Law 5977, 9 Official Gazette 76 (in Turkish)
