Research Article

Yield and yield components of some advanced Camelina (Camelina sativa L. CRANTZ) genotypes in Bolu ecological conditions

Volume: 8 Number: 1 March 25, 2024
EN

Yield and yield components of some advanced Camelina (Camelina sativa L. CRANTZ) genotypes in Bolu ecological conditions

Abstract

The negative effects of global warming are increasing worldwide and this increase is expected to continue. The camelina plant, which can be grown in marginal areas, stands out among other oilseed plants because it is drought-resistant and less costly. In the research, seeds belonging to 8 camelina genotypes, which were prominent in terms of oil rate, seed and oil yield, were used in the trial established in Bolu province, out of a total of 52 genotypes obtained from the seed bank of the United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service and Germany. The study was conducted according to the Randomized Complete Block Design in Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University, Faculty of Agriculture, Research and Application Field in the 2021-2022 production season. In the trait, each plot consisted of six rows with a row length of 3 m, a row spacing of 20 cm, and in row of 5 cm, with three replications. According to the research results; plant height 66.33-71.00 cm, number of branches 3.17-5.07 number plant-1, 1000 seed weight 1.10-1.24 g, seed yield 1095.4-1436.6 kg ha-1, oil content 36.63-40.37%, protein content 23.65-27.22%, oil yield 408.3-559.8 kg ha-1 and protein yield 279.0-391.3 kg ha-1. It was found that values between. According to the results obtained from the study, the K52 genotype in terms of seed yield, the K11 genotype in terms of oil rate and the K52 genotype in terms of protein rate came to the fore.

Keywords

Camelina, Yield ve yield components, Oil composition, Bolu

References

  1. Agegnehu, M., Honermeier, B. (1997). Effects of seeding rate and nitrogen fertilization on seed yield, seed quality and yield components of false flax (Camelina sativa Crtz). Die Bodenkultur. 48 (1).
  2. Akk, E. E. Ilumäe. (2005). Possibilities of Growing Camelina sativa in Ecological Cultivation. www.eria.ee/public/files/camelina-envirfood.pdf.
  3. Arslan, Y., Subaşı, İ., Katar, D., Kodaş R., Keyvanoğlu, H. (2014). Farklı Azot ve Fosfor Dozlarının Ketencik Bitkisi (Camelina sativa L. CRANTZ)’nin Bazı Bitkisel Özellikleri Üzerine Olan Etkisinin Belirlenmesi. Anadolu Tarım Bilim Dergisi. 29(3):231-239.
  4. Arslan, Y., Subaşı, İ., Hatipoğlu, H., Abrak, S., İşler, B. (2022). Study on Correlation of Agromorphologic Properties in Some Camelina (Camelina sativa L. CRANTZ) Genotypes. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 32(4), 835-842.
  5. Bernardo, A., Howard-Hildige, R., O’Connell, A., Nichol, R., Ryan, J., Rice, B., Leahy, Crowley, J. G., Fröhlich, A. (1998). Factors Affecting the Composition and Use of Camelina. Crops Research Centre, Oak Park, Carlow. ISBN 1 901138666.
  6. Broun, P., Gettner, S., Somerville, C. (1999). Genetic engineering of plant lipids. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 19:197–216.
  7. Çoban F., M. Önder. (2015). Ekim Sıklıklarının Ketencik (Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz) Bitkisinde Önemli Agronomik Özellikler Üzerine Etkileri. Selçuk Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi. 1(2): 50-55.
  8. Das, U. N. (2006). Essential fatty acids: biochemistry, physiology and pathol- ogy. Biotechnol. J. 1:420–439.
  9. Fogelfors, H. (1984). Useful weeds, Part 5. Lantmannen (Sweden) 105:28.
  10. Francis, A., Warwick, S.I. (2009). The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 142. Camelina alyssum (Mill.) Thell. Can.J. Plant Sci. 89:791–810.
APA
Arslan, Y., Yaşar, M., İşler, B., Ünal, S., & Subaşı, İ. (2024). Yield and yield components of some advanced Camelina (Camelina sativa L. CRANTZ) genotypes in Bolu ecological conditions. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences, 8(1), 211-219. https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2024.1.21
AMA
1.Arslan Y, Yaşar M, İşler B, Ünal S, Subaşı İ. Yield and yield components of some advanced Camelina (Camelina sativa L. CRANTZ) genotypes in Bolu ecological conditions. int. j. agric. environ. food sci. 2024;8(1):211-219. doi:10.31015/jaefs.2024.1.21
Chicago
Arslan, Yusuf, Mustafa Yaşar, Berfin İşler, Sefa Ünal, and İlhan Subaşı. 2024. “Yield and Yield Components of Some Advanced Camelina (Camelina Sativa L. CRANTZ) Genotypes in Bolu Ecological Conditions”. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences 8 (1): 211-19. https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2024.1.21.
EndNote
Arslan Y, Yaşar M, İşler B, Ünal S, Subaşı İ (March 1, 2024) Yield and yield components of some advanced Camelina (Camelina sativa L. CRANTZ) genotypes in Bolu ecological conditions. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences 8 1 211–219.
IEEE
[1]Y. Arslan, M. Yaşar, B. İşler, S. Ünal, and İ. Subaşı, “Yield and yield components of some advanced Camelina (Camelina sativa L. CRANTZ) genotypes in Bolu ecological conditions”, int. j. agric. environ. food sci., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 211–219, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.31015/jaefs.2024.1.21.
ISNAD
Arslan, Yusuf - Yaşar, Mustafa - İşler, Berfin - Ünal, Sefa - Subaşı, İlhan. “Yield and Yield Components of Some Advanced Camelina (Camelina Sativa L. CRANTZ) Genotypes in Bolu Ecological Conditions”. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences 8/1 (March 1, 2024): 211-219. https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2024.1.21.
JAMA
1.Arslan Y, Yaşar M, İşler B, Ünal S, Subaşı İ. Yield and yield components of some advanced Camelina (Camelina sativa L. CRANTZ) genotypes in Bolu ecological conditions. int. j. agric. environ. food sci. 2024;8:211–219.
MLA
Arslan, Yusuf, et al. “Yield and Yield Components of Some Advanced Camelina (Camelina Sativa L. CRANTZ) Genotypes in Bolu Ecological Conditions”. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences, vol. 8, no. 1, Mar. 2024, pp. 211-9, doi:10.31015/jaefs.2024.1.21.
Vancouver
1.Yusuf Arslan, Mustafa Yaşar, Berfin İşler, Sefa Ünal, İlhan Subaşı. Yield and yield components of some advanced Camelina (Camelina sativa L. CRANTZ) genotypes in Bolu ecological conditions. int. j. agric. environ. food sci. 2024 Mar. 1;8(1):211-9. doi:10.31015/jaefs.2024.1.21