Mechanization and agricultural farm structure in the agricultural area of the Dardanelles region

Yıl 2020, , 39 - 56, 15.03.2020

Sakine Özpınar

https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2020.1.6

Cited By: 2

Öz

This study was conducted to determine the current mechanization in agricultural farms of the Bayramic-Ezine-Kumkale agricultural plains, in Canakkale (Dardanelles) region of west of Turkey. For this purpose, a questionnaire was carried out for 401 farms capable of growing both field and horticulture crops. Results indicated that each farm having small size characteristic has at least one tractor, but 19.20% of farms had more than one tractor. The status of having one (91.67%) or more (41.67%) tractors in a farm was higher in Bayramic, due to field and horticulture crops, than both others. However, the highest number of tractors was recorded in Kumkale farms (60.00%), followed by Ezine (31.65%) and Bayramic (8.35%). Most of them are young, but 12.00% are older than 24-year, especially Massey Ferguson-135, Universal and Fiat (54C, 480). The most used tractor brand has been New Holland (32.15%), followed by Massey Ferguson (18.99%), Fiat (9.11%), John Deere (8.10%), Case IH (7.85%), Same (5.05%), Deutz (4.05%), Steyr (3.54%), Valtra (2.28%) and others (Ford, Hattat, Erkunt, Basak, Tumosan, Universal, Kubota and Landini). On average three-plain, 77.03% of farms were preferred to purchase the new tractors, 22.97% preferred the second-hand ones. Tractor was 0.99 per farm, but it was the highest in Ezine (1.17). Agricultural area per tractor was 117 decare on average three-plain, the highest for Kumkale (136 decare) and the lowest for Ezine (83 decare tractor-1). Machinery per tractor was 7.67 for all farms, but Kumkale (8.78) had the highest, and then followed by Bayramic (6.58) and Ezine (5.87).

Anahtar Kelimeler

Mechanization, Farmer Status, Crop Pattern, Farm Structure

Kaynakça

• Abdikoğlu, D.I. (2019). Determining of agricultural mechanization level in Thrace Region by provinces. KSU J Agriculture Natural, 22(6), 865-871.
• Akdemir, B. (2013). Agricultural mechanization in Turkey. IERI Procedia, 5, 41-44.
• Aybek, A., Senel, H. (2009). Mechanization properties and users’ evaluations of farm tractors in Eastern Mediterranean Turkey. Journal of Agricultural Machinery Sci, 5(1), 21-27.
• Aydın, B., Özkan. E. Hurma. H., Aktaş, E., Azabağaoğlu. Ö., Özdemir, G. (2017). Efficiency analysis of irrigation administration (Cases of Kirklareli. Edirne. Tekirdag and Çanakkale Provinces). Turkish J of Agricultural and Natural Sci, 4(1), 70-78.
• Compagnone, C., Lemery, B., Petit, S., Kockmann, F., Moretty, P. (2013). Form and Reform in the Organization of Chambers of Agriculture. http://journals.openedition.org/economierurale/4095 (Date of Access: November 2017).
• Civelek, Ç. (2016). Turkey’s demand for agricultural tractors and machinery. Scholars J of Agriculture and Veterinary Sci, 3(1), 51-57.
• Eurostate, 2018. Agriculture, forestry and fishery statistics. Statistical book. (in Editor). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents. Accessed in November 2019. GMKA, 2016. South Marmara Development Agency. Agricultural and Livestock Sectors Investment Guide. https://www.gmka.gov.tr (Date of access: September 2019). Gunes, E., Movassaghi, H. (2017). Agricultural credit market and farmers’ response: A case study of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 5(1), 84-92.
• Hazell. P., Poulton, C., Wiggins, S., Dorward, A. (2007). The Future of small farms for poverty reduction and growth. International Food Policy Research Institute 2033 K Street. Washington DC 20006-1002. USA.
• Spiewak, R., Milczarek, D., Ciechomska, A. (2016). Agricultural Organizations in Poland-An Attempt Towards A Typology. https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/ 253979/2/92-4-2016.pdf (Date of access: October 2017).
• Keleş, I., Hacıseferoğulları, H. (2016). Determination of agricultural structure and mechanization lLevels of agricultural enterprises located in Cumra distract of Konya province. Selçuk Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(1), 48-58.
• Marandi, L.T., Rashidpour, L. (2017). Impact of credit on agricultural mechanization and development in Urmia country. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Sci, 23 (6), 922-928. Matthews, G.A. (2008). Attitudes and behaviours regarding use of crop protection products-A survey of more than 8500 smallholders in 26 countries. Crop Protection, 27, 834-846.
• Oğuz, C., Bayramoğlu, Z., Ağızan, Z., Ağızan, K. (2017). Agricultural mechanization usage level in agricultural enterprises, Case of Konya province. Selcuk J Agr Food Sci, 31 (1), 63-72. Okan, N.D., Okan, C. (2013). An overview of cooperatives in Turkey. FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia. Policy Studies on Rural Transition No. 2013-3. pp.65. Özpınar, S., Çay. A. (2018). The role of agricultural mechanization in farming system in a continental climate. Journal of Tekirdag Agriculture Faculty, 15(2), 58-72.
• Ozmerzi, A. (1998). Mechanization level in vegetable production in Antalya Region and Turkey. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia. Africa. and Latin America, 29(1), 43-43. Özpınar, S. (2002). A research on determination of agricultural structure and mechanisation characteristics of farms in Çanakkale Province. 8th International Congress on Mechanization and Energy in Agriculture. October 15-17. 436-441. Kusadası. Turkey.
• Ruiyin, H., Y., Wenging, Z. Yadong, Van Somsbeek, G.N.J. (1999). Improving management system of agricultural Machinery in Jiangsu. In Proceeding of 99 International Conferences on Agricultural Engineering. December 1999. Beijing. pp 42-43.
• Singh, G. (2006). Estimation of a Mechanisation index and its impact on production and economic factors-A case study in India. Biosystems Engineering, 93(1), 99-106. Yamane, T. (1967). Elementary Sampling Theory. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs. Inc.
• Yılmaz, S., Sümer, S.K. (2018). Determining of the tractor renewing rates and agricultural mechanization level in Turkey. Journal of Agricultural Machinery Science, 14, 79-87. Yücel, M.H. (2019). The Impact of Agricultural Mechanization and Agricultural Productivity on Agricultural Employment. Hacettepe University of Social Sciences Institute. Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Department of Economics. Master’s Thesis. Ankara. 2019. pp. 100.
• TAGEM, 2019. Tarımsal Meaknizasyon Sektör Politika Belgesi 2018-2022. Ankara. 2018. pp.67. http://www.tarmakbir.org. (date of access: August 2019).
• Tezer, E., Sabancı, A. (1997). Agricultural mechanization. I. Çukurova University Agriculture Faculty General Publication. No:44. Adana.
• TUIK, 2018. Turkish Statistic Institute. Ankara. (http://www.tuik.gov.tr (Date of access: July 2019).
• World Bank. 2003. Reaching the Rural Poor: A Renewed Strategy for Rural Development. Washington. D.C.