Evaluating of Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Cultivars for Boron Efficient and Tolerant

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 218 - 227, 06.03.2023

Sait Gezgin Ayşegül Korkmaz Fatma Gökmen Yılmaz

https://doi.org/10.28979/jarnas.1180443

Öz

This study was carried out in a greenhouse in 2021 to determine the boron response of some bean cultivars at increasing levels of boron doses. The experiment established according to the complete randomized design with three replications was applied to 15 registered bean cultivars at 0, 5, and 10 mg B/kg doses using Na2B8O13.4H2O (20.8% B) fertilizer. The above-ground organs were harvested during the blooming period, and the cultivars of Befficient and B-tolerant were determined in the investigation of their dry weight, B content, and concentrations. Dry weights increased by 1% (Doruk, 10 mg B/kg) and 38% (Kantar-05, 5 mg B/kg) under B conditions, compared with the non-treatment group. Furthermore, insufficient B levels in the soil conditions were evaluated as B-efficient bean cultivars having a dry weight above the average, but cultivars having a dry weight below the average were named Btolerant cultivars. As a result of the study, it was determined changing depends on the boron application of boron
efficient (B-effect) and boron tolerant (B-tolerant) bean cultivars. Cihan, Güngör, Berrak, Elkoca-05, Özdemir, Kantar-05 and Arslan cultivars were confirmed as B-efficient, although Zülbiye, Sururbey, Doruk, Göksun, Karacabey, Özmen, Battallı and Zirve cultivars were determined as B-tolerant cultivars. As a result of the study, it was determined that the efficient boron cultivars were Zülbiye, Zirve and Battallı, while the boron tolerant cultivars Cihan and Arslan.

Anahtar Kelimeler

bean, B-efficient, boron activity, boron content, B-tolerant

Destekleyen Kurum

S.Ü. BAP KOORDİNATÖRLÜĞÜ

Proje Numarası

20401074

Teşekkür

We would like to thank Selçuk University Scientific Research Projects Coordinatorship for their sup-port.

Kaynakça

• Akoğlu, A. (2013). The response of some common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes to boron applications (In Turkish) (Master's thesis). Eskişehir Osman Gazi Üniversitesi, Eskişehir, Turkey.
• Alkan, A. (1998). Resistance of different cereal species and wheat and barley cultivars to boron toxicity and factors affecting expression of high boron resistance (/In Turkish) (Unpublished Doctoral thesis). Çukurova Üniversitesi, Adana, Turkey.
• Atalay, E., Gezgin, S., & Babaoğlu, M. (2003). Boron uptake of in vitro seedlings of wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) as determined by ICP-AES. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 17(32), 47-52.
• Brdar-Jokanović, M. (2020). Boron toxicity and deficiency in agricultural plants. International journal of molecular sciences, 21(4), 1424. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21041424
• Ceyhan, E., Önder, M., Hamurcu, M., Harmankaya, M., Gökmen, F., & Gezgin, S. (2006). Response of dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) cultivars to foliar and soil applied in boron defficient calcareous soils. Plant and Soil.
• Ceyhan, E., Önder, M., Harmankaya, M., Hamurcu, M., & Gezgin, S. (2007). Response of chickpea cultivars to application of boron in boron‐deficient calcareous soils. Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 38(17-18), 2381-2399. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620701588734
• Dhaliwal, S. S., Sharma, V., Shukla, A. K., Verma, V., Behera, S. K., Sandhu, P. S., Kaur, K., Gaber, A., Althobaiti, Y. S., Abdelhadi, A. A. & Hossain, A. (2021). Assessment of agroeconomic indicators of Sesamum indicum L. as influenced by application of boron at different levels and plant growth stages. Molecules, 26(21), 6699. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26216699
• Dordas, C., Chrispeels, M. J., & Brown, P. H. (2000). Permeability and channel-mediated transport of boric acid across membrane vesicles isolated from squash roots. Plant physiology, 124(3), 1349-1362. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.124.3.1349
• Dordas, C., & Brown, P. H. (2001). Permeability and channel-mediated transport of boric acid across plant membranes. An explanation for differential B uptake in plants. In Plant Nutrition (pp. 190-191). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.124.3.1349
• Graham, R. D. (1984). Breeding for nutritional characterstics in cereals. Advances in plant nutrition, 1, 57-102. https://doi.org/10.3759/tropics.12.295
• Güneş, A., & Alpaslan, M. (2000). Boron uptake and toxicity in maize genotypes in relation to boron and phosphorus supply. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 23(4), 541-550. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904160009382038
• Hakkoymaz, O., Önder, M., & Gezgin, S. (2006). The adaptatıon of the summer lentıl varıetıes and determınıng the effect to boron toxıc ın konya ecologıcal condıtıons. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 20(38), 98-107.
• Hamurcu, M., & Gezgin, S. (2007). Effect of boron and zınc applıcatıons on bıomass values of dwarf bean (phaseolus vulgaris l.) genotypes. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 21(41), 11-22.
• Harmankaya, M., Hamurcu, M., Ceyhan, E., & Gezgin, S. (2008). Response of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars to foliar and soil applied boron in borondeficient calcareous soils. African Journal of Biotechnology, 7(18).
• Huang, C., & Graham, R. D. (1990). Resistance of wheat genotypes to boron toxicity is expressed at the cellular level. Plant and Soil, 126(2), 295-300.
• Jones Jr, J. B., Wolf, B., & Mills, H. A. (1991). Plant analysis handbook. A practical sampling, preparation, analysis, and interpretation guide. Micro-Macro Publishing, Inc.
• Nable, R. O., & Paull, J. G. (1991). Mechanism and genetics of tolerance to boron toxicity in plants. In Current topics in plant biochemistry and physiology: Proceedings of the... Plant Biochemistry and Physiology Symposium held at the University of Missouri, Columbia (USA).
• Paull, J. G., Cartwright, B., & Rathjen, A. J. (1988). Responses of wheat and barley genotypes to toxic concentrations of soil boron. Euphytica, 39(2), 137-144.
• Punchana, S., Cakir, M., Rerkasem, B., & Jamjod, S. (2012). Mapping the Bod2 gene associated with boron efficiency in wheat. ScienceAsia, 38(3), 235-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.201...
• Sadiq, S. M. S. M., & Mohammed, A. A. M. A. (2022). Response of faba bean to plantıng dıstance between plants and sprayıng wıth nano and tradıtıonal boron: response of faba bean to plantıng dıstance between plants and sprayıng wıth nano and tradıtıonal boron. Iraqi Journal of Market Research and Consumer Protection, 14(1)), 84-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.28936/jmracpc
• Schnurbusch, T., Hayes, J., Hrmova, M., Baumann, U., Ramesh, S. A., Tyerman, S. D., & Sutton, T. (2010). Boron toxicity tolerance in barley through reduced expression of the multifunctional aquaporin HvNIP2; 1. Plant Physiology, 153(4), 1706-1715. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.158832
• Taban, S., & Erdal, İ. (2000). Effects of boron on growth of various wheat varieties and distribution of boron in aerial part. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 24(2), 255-262.
• Topal, A., Gezgin, S., Akgün, N., Dursun, N., & Babaoglu, M. (2002). Yield and yield attributes of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) as affected by boron application. In Boron in Plant and Animal Nutrition (pp. 401-406). Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0607-2_42
• Torun, A. A., Yazici, A., Erdem, H., & Çakmak, İ. (2006). Genotypic variation in tolerance to boron toxicity in 70 durum wheat genotypes. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 30(1), 49-58.
• Torun, A. A., Bozgeyik, S., & Duymuş, E. (2021). The Effect of Boron Application in Increasing Doses on Shoot Boron Concentration and Uptake of Other Nutrients of Pistachio (Pistacia vera L.). Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 9(5), 855-862. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v9i5.855-862.4044
• Wang, Q., Li, J., Li, Z., & Christie, P. (2005). Screening Chinese wheat germplasm for phosphorus efficiency in calcareous soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 28(3), 489-505. https://doi.org/10.1081/PLN-200049186