Value Perception of Intangible Cultural Heritage Elements from Local People's Perspective: The Nevşehir Example

Öz

This study aims to determine the local population’s perception of the value of Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) elements in Nevşehir. The local population’s perception plays a crucial role in policies regarding the preservation, transmission, and utilization of ICH elements in tourism. A qualitative approach was adopted in the research; structured interviews were conducted with 20 residents of Nevşehir, and the data obtained were analyzed using thematic analysis. According to the research findings, the local community exhibits positive emotional and cognitive attitudes toward ICH elements. Emotionally, these elements help establish a connection with the past, reinforce a sense of belonging, and strengthen positive emotions such as pride and happiness. Cognitively, it was noted that ICH elements contribute to the formation of cultural identity, the development of creativity, and the strengthening of social bonds. These elements, which positively influence mental processes, help individuals find calm and gain awareness. From an economic perspective, heritage elements such as pottery making and carpet weaving serve as a significant source of income for the local population. These traditional crafts, which provide income for the local community, also attract attention as tourist products. Additionally, these activities increase women’s employment and support the promotion of the region.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Nevşehir
• Intangible Cultural Heritage
• Local People
• Perception of Value

Yerel Halkın Bakış Açısından Somut Olmayan Kültürel Miras Unsurları Değer Algısı: Nevşehir Örneği

Öz

Bu çalışma, Nevşehir'deki yerel halkın Somut Olmayan Kültürel Miras (SOKÜM) unsurlarına yönelik değer algısını belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. SOKÜM unsurlarının korunması, aktarılması ve turizmde kullanılmasına yönelik politikalarda yerel halkın algısı büyük önem taşımaktadır. Araştırmada nitel yöntem benimsenmiş, Nevşehir'de yaşayan 20 kişiyle yapılandırılmış görüşmeler gerçekleştirilmiş ve elde edilen veriler tematik analiz yöntemiyle incelenmiştir. Araştırma bulgularına göre, yerel halk SOKÜM unsurlarına karşı olumlu duygusal ve bilişsel yaklaşımlar sergilemektedir. Duygusal açıdan bu unsurlar; geçmişle bağ kurmayı, aidiyet hissini ve gurur, mutluluk gibi olumlu duyguları pekiştirmektedir. Bilişsel boyutta ise SOKÜM unsurlarının kültürel kimliğin oluşumuna, yaratıcılığın gelişimine ve sosyal bağların güçlenmesine katkı sağladığı belirtilmiştir. Zihinsel süreçleri olumlu yönde etkileyen bu unsurlar, bireylerin sakinleşmesine ve farkındalık kazanmasına yardımcı olmaktadır. Ekonomik açıdan bakıldığında, çanak çömlek yapımı ve halı dokumacılığı gibi miras unsurları bölge halkı için önemli bir gelir kaynağı oluşturmaktadır. Bölgedeki yerel halkın gelir elde etmesini sağlayan bu el sanatları, turistik birer ürün olarak da dikkat çekmektedir. Ayrıca, bu faaliyetler kadın istihdamını artırmakta ve bölgenin tanıtımına destek olmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Nevşehir
• Somut Olmayan Kültürel Miras
• Yerel Halk
• Değer Algısı

Kaynakça

1. Aguado, L. F., Arbona, A., Palma, L., & Heredia-Carroza, J. (2021). How to value a cultural festival? The case of Petronio Álvarez Pacific Music Festival in Colombia. Development Studies Research, 8(1), 309-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2021.1979417
2. Ahmad, Y. (2006). The scope and definitions of heritage: from tangible to intangible. International journal of heritage studies, 12(3), 292-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250600604639
3. Anderson, E. (1995). Value in ethics and economics. Harvard University Press.
4. Arıoğlu, I. E., & Aydoğdu Atasoy, Ö. (2015). Somut olmayan kültürel miras kapsamında geleneksel el sanatları ve kültür ve turizm bakanlığı. Electronic Turkish Studies, 10(16). 109-126.
5. Artese, M. T., & Gagliardi, I. (2022). Integrating, indexing and querying the tangible and intangible cultural heritage available online: the QueryLab portal. Information, 13(5), 260.
6. Bakar, A. A., Osman, M. M., Bachok, S., & Ibrahim, M. (2014). Analysis on community involvement level in intangible cultural heritage: Malacca cultural community. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153, 286-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.062
7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.*
8. Çakır, C. Ş. (2010). Somut olmayan kültürel mirasın müzelenmesi. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.

9. Çapar, G., & Yenipınar, U. (2016). Somut olmayan kültürel miras kaynağı olarak yöresel yiyeceklerin turizm endüstrisinde kullanılması. Journal of Tourism & Gastronomy Studies, 4(Special Issue 1), 100-115. https://doi.org/10.21325/jotags.2016.25
10. Creswell, J.W. (2013), Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, Sage.
11. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage.
12. Fu, Y. (2023). Analysis of the transmission and development of traditional handicrafts in intangible cultural heritage. Frontiers in Art Research, 5(5), 23-29.
13. Gavin, H. (2008), Thematic Analysis. Understanding Research Methods and Statistics in Psychology, Sage.
14. Heredia-Carroza, J., Palma Martos, L., & Aguado, L. F. (2021). How to measure intangible cultural heritage value? The case of flamenco in Spain. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 39(2), 149-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276237420907865
15. Karabaşa, S. (2014). Uygulamaları açısından somut olmayan kültürel miras ve folklor. Folklor/edebiyat, 20(80), 99-105.
16. Kim, S., Whitford, M., & Arcodia, C. (2021). Development of intangible cultural heritage as a sustainable tourism resource: The intangible cultural heritage practitioners’ perspectives. In Authenticity and Authentication of Heritage (pp. 34-47). Routledge.
17. Klamer, A. (2003). A pragmatic view on values in economics. Journal of economic methodology, 10(2), 191-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178032000071075
18. Lan, T., Zheng, Z., Tian, D., Zhang, R., Law, R., & Zhang, M. (2021). Resident-tourist value co-creation in the intangible cultural heritage tourism context: The role of residents’ perception of tourism development and emotional solidarity. Sustainability, 13(3), 1369. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031369
19. Lenzerini, F. (2011). Intangible cultural heritage: The living culture of peoples. European Journal of International Law, 22(1), 101-120. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chr006
20. Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family practice, 13(6), 522-526. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/13.6.522
21. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
22. Oğuz, M. Ö. (2009). Somut olmayan kültürel miras nedir?. Geleneksel Yayıncılık.
23. Pang, L., & Wu, L. (2023). Distribution characteristics and influencing factors of intangible cultural heritage in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei. Heritage Science, 11(1), 1-17.
24. Petronela, T. (2016). The importance of the intangible cultural heritage in the economy. Procedia Economics and Finance, 39, 731-736. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30271-430271-4)
25. Poria, Y., Reichel, A., & Biran, A. (2006). Heritage site management: Motivations and expectations. Annals of tourism research, 33(1), 162-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2005.08.001
26. Qiu, Q., Zheng, T., Xiang, Z., & Zhang, M. (2019). Visiting intangible cultural heritage tourism sites: From value cognition to attitude and intention. Sustainability, 12(1), 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010132
27. Qiu, Q., Zuo, Y., & Zhang, M. (2022). Intangible cultural heritage in tourism: Research review and investigation of future agenda. Land, 11(1), 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010139
28. Roccas, S., & Sagiv, L. (2010). Personal values and behavior: Taking the cultural context into account. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(1), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00234.x
29. Sawagvudcharee, O., Liu, H., & Zhang, C. (2020). Tourist Perceived Value and Quality of Intangible Cultural Heritage Souvenirs on Customers’ Purchase Intention: A Case Study of Chinese Tourists. International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Research, 4, 181-195.
30. Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116
31. Sotiriadis, M. (2017). Pairing intangible cultural heritage with tourism: The case of Mediterranean diet. EuroMed Journal of Business, 12(3), 269-284. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-07-2016-0019
32. Su, X., Li, X., Chen, W., & Zeng, T. (2020a). Subjective vitality, authenticity experience, and intangible cultural heritage tourism: an empirical study of the puppet show. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 37(2), 258-271. Https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2020.1740141
33. Su, X., Li, X., Wu, Y., & Yao, L. (2020b). How is intangible cultural heritage valued in the eyes of inheritors? Scale development and validation. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 44(5), 806-834. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348020914691
34. Teke, S. G. (2013). Geleneksel tarzlar, modern modeller: resmî, resmî olmayan eğitim ve somut olmayan kültürel miras. Millî Folklor, 25(100), 31-39.
35. Throsby, D. (2010). The economics of cultural policy. Cambridge University Press.
36. Vázquez-Atochero, A. (2024, November). The Elderly's role in preserving and transmitting intangible cultural heritage. In International Workshop on Gerontechnology (pp. 3-17). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
37. Xia, H., Chen, T., & Hou, G. (2020). Study on collaboration intentions and behaviors of public participation in the inheritance of ICH based on an extended theory of planned behavior. Sustainability, 12(11), 4349. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114349
38. Xiao, L. (2022). Intangible Cultural Heritage Reproduction and Revitalization: Value Feedback, Practice, and Exploration Based on the IPA Model. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 1. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8411999
39. Yaegashi, T. (2019). A Husserlian account of the affective cognition of value. New Phenomenological Studies in Japan, 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11893-8_6
40. Yaşar, E., & Yayla, E. (2023). The Place and Importance of Intangible Cultural Heritage Elements in the Lives of Heritage Masters. Uluslararası Türk Dünyası Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(2), 122-133. https://doi.org/10.37847/tdtad.1323857
41. Yolcu, M. A. (2014). NEVŞEHİR'DE yaşayan geleneksel mesleklerin değişim ve dönüşümü. Electronic Turkish Studies, 9(2). 1719-1738. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.6432
42. Yoshikawa, T. (2019). Akrasia and practical rationality: A phenomenological approach. New phenomenological studies in Japan, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11893-8_1
43. Yu, H. (2015). A vernacular way of “safeguarding” intangible heritage: The fall and rise of rituals in Gouliang Miao village. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 21(10), 1016-1035. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2015.1048813
44. Zainab, O. N., Jin, C., Yulan, Z., Ehi, O., Penninah, N., & Ikechukwu, O. (2022). User Perceptions on Intangible Cultural Heritage of the Ancient Bini Kingdom and the Acceptance of Extended Reality (XR) in Its Recreation and Representation. Art and Design Review, 10(2), 280-295. https://doi.org/10.4236/adr.2022.102021