Reconstruction of Private Archives in Turkey

Öz

Archives have been divided into two groups in both theory and the practice in the Archival Science. The first is “public archives” and the other is “private archives”. There are ownership, usage right and belonging of these documents on the basis of this classification. The identification of the private archives has become important because private organizations and capital have an effective role in both production and management of the State and many countries have had to make new regulations in the archive legislation. Legislation in our country has been examined on the scope of our study and the current situation has been revealed. In order to understand the legal regulation very well the studies abroad have been included in the study, and practices have been examined. In the last part of the study necessary factors related to the private archives in National Archive Law have been detailed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Public archives, Private archives, Legislation

Kaynakça

1. Anameriç, H. (2009) ‘Özel arşivler: türleri ve Türkiye’den örnekler’, in Önen B. Z. and Türkyılmaz, M. (ed.), Türkiye’de arşivler ve arşivcilik uygulamaları, Ankara: VEKAM.
2. Anameriç, H. and Rukancı, F. (2008) ‘Bulgaristan'a satılan evrak ve özel arşivlerin ülke tarihindeki önemi’, Proc. of Balkan Ülkeleri Kütüphaneler Arası Bilgi-Belge Yönetimi ve İşbirliği Sempozyumu, Edirne, 108-117.
3. Aren, T. (1998) ‘Özel arşivler ve kamu arşivleri ile ilişkileri’, Proc. of I. Milli Arşiv Şurası: Tebliğler-Tartışmalar, Ankara, 523- 541.
4. Ataman, B. K. (1997) Özel arşivler. İskenderiye yazıları, 9(4). Available at http://www.beyaz.net/tr/arsiv/makaleler/bekir-kemal-ataman/ozel-arsivler.html [Accessed 12 February 2014].
5. Bellardo, L. J. and Bellardo, L. L. (1992) A glossary for archivists, manuscript curators, and records managers. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.
6. Devlet Arşiv Hizmetleri Hakkında Yönetmelik (1988) Available at: http://www.devletarsivleri.gov.tr/Forms/pgArticle.aspx?Id=9A7ECB76-4A29-4092-920B-4E1C80E81B62 [Accessed 1 February 2014].
7. Fisher, R. (2009) ‘In Search of a theory of private archives: The foundational writings of Jenkinson and Schellenberg revisited’, Archivaria, 67(Spring 2009): 1-4.
8. Mabbs, A.W, Philip H. S., and Broome, E.M. (1977) Establishing a legislative framework for the implementation of NATIS. Paris: UNESCO. Available at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0002/000292/029274eb.pdf [Accessed 3 February 2014].

9. Milli Arşiv Kanun Tasarısı (2006) Available at: http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/develop/owa/tasari_teklif_gd.onerge_bilgileri?kanunlar_sira_no=42581 [Accessed 11 February 2014].
10. Nalen, J. E. (2002) ‘Private archives in China’, Libri, 52: 241-262.
11. Rukancı, F. (2009) ‘Özel arşiv kavramı ve yurt dışındaki uygulamalardan örnekler’, in Önen, B. Z. and Türkyılmaz, Mehtap (eds.), Türkiye’de arşivler ve arşivcilik uygulamaları. Ankara: VEKAM. 53- 69.
12. Schöggl-Ernst, E. (2007) ‘Private archives – private companies – privatised sectors: Problems of saving archival documents’, Atlanti, 17(1-2): 273-276.
13. Walne, P. (ed.) (1988) Dictionary of Archival Terminology: English and French: with Equivalents in Dutch, German, Italian, Russian and Spanish. München: Saur.