New Approaches in Selection and Evaluation of Electronic Resources

Öz

In the early years of 2000, academic libraries used to transfer nearly 16% of their purchase budget to electronic resources which have been begun to be used commonly from the middle of the 1990’s whereas today it is clear that they transfer more than 90% of their budget. The selection and evaluation process of electronic resources have become much more important either due to the increasing budget spared for electronic resources or because of the tightening budgets of the libraries. In the light of the facts mentioned above, within the scope of the study, the issues to be taken into consideration throughout subscription process of the electronic resources, which has begun to gain speed since the beginning of 2000’s in our country, are specified. Within this framework, as well as focusing particularly on access models for the electronic resources, issues to be paid attention such as scope, content, functionality, cost, publisher support, licensing and technical requirements are also addressed. Primary requirements and approaches regarding the evaluation process are specified, as well.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Electronic publishing,electronic resources,selection of the e-resources,evaluation of the e-resources

Kaynakça

1. Al, U., & Al, P. (2003). Elektronik bilgi kaynaklarının seçimi. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 4(1), 1-14.
2. ANKOS. (2019). Genel bilgi. Retrieved from http://www.ankos.gen.tr/web/index.php/ankoshakkinda/genelbilgi
3. ARL. (2018). ARL Statistics 2016-2017. Retrieved from https://publications.arl.org/ARL-Statistics-2016-2017/
4. Asamoah-Hassan, H. (2014). The Consortium of Academic and Research Libraries in Ghana (CARLIGH): The Journey so Far. Retrieved from http://ir.knust.edu.gh/bitstream/123456789/1193/1/CARLIGH%20-%20Preconference-%20Quebec%20City.pdf
5. Atılgan, D., & Yalçın, Y. (2009).Elektronik kaynakların seçimi ve değerlendirilmesi. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 24(4), 769-803.
6. Carrico, S. (2011). An academic library’s efforts to justify materials budget expenditures: Charleston Library Conference. Retrieved from https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1203&context=charleston
7. Chan, L. (1999). Electronic journals and academic libraries. Library Hi Tech, 17(1), 10-16.
8. Chandra, H. (2002). E-Resources management with specific reference to E-reference sources: Initiatives and issues en Paperlandia. Retrieved from http://eprints.rclis.org/6695/1/resources.pdf

9. Curtis, D., Scheschy, M. V., & Tarango A. R. (2000). Developing and Managing Electronic Journal Collection. New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers.
10. EKUAL. (2019). TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM EKUAL hakkında. Retrieved from https://cabim.ulakbim.gov.tr/ekual/hakkinda/
11. Gürdal, G., & Kafalı Can, G. (2017). E-Kaynakların Seçimi ve Yönetimi: İYTE Kütüphanesi.
12. Johnson, S., Evensen, O. G., Gelfand, J., Lammers, G., Sipe, L., & Zilper, N. (2012). Key issues for e-resource collection development: a guide for libraries. Retrieved from https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/acquisition-collectiondevelopment/publications/electronic-resource-guide-en.pdf
13. Karasözen, B, & Lindley, J. A. (2019). ANKOS: Türkiye’de konsorsiyum gelişimi. Retrieved from https://www.ankos.gen.tr/web/index.php/turkiyedekonsorsiyumungelisimi
14. Lindley, J. (2002). Konsorsiyumların Gelişimi ve Uluslararası Kütüphane Konsorsiyumu (Tülay Fenerci, tran.). Kütüphanecilikte Yeni Gelişmeler, Kavramlar, Olgular 37. Kütüphane Haftası Bildirileri, 26 Mart-01 Nisan 2002 (pp. 83-92). Ankara: Türk Kütüphaneciler Derneği.
15. Merkez Bankası. (2019). Gösterge niteliğindeki Merkez Bankası döviz kurları. Retrieved from https://www.tcmb.gov.tr/kurlar/kurlar_tr.html
16. Metz, P. (2000). Principles of selection for electronic resources. Library Trends, 48(4), 711-728.
17. Montgomery, C. H., & King, D. V. (2002). Comparing library and user related costs of print and electronic journal collections: A first step towards a comprehensive analysis. Retrieved from http://dlib.org/dlib/october02/montgomery/10montgomery.html
18. Moret, B. M. E. (1997). ACM's Journal of Experimental Algorithmics: Bridging the gap between theory and practice. Retrieved from https://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jep/3336451.0003.101?view=text;rgn=main
19. Neal, J. G. (1996). Academic Libraries: 2000 and beyond. Library Journal, 121(12), 74-76.
20. Sutton, S. (2013). A Model for electronic resources value assessment. The Serials Librarian, 64, 245-253.
21. Tetteh, E. O. A. (2018). Usage evaluation of electronic resources in academic and research libraries in Ghana. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 67(4/5), 316-331.
22. Tripathi, M., & Jeevan, V. (2013). A selective review of research on e-resource usage in academic libraries. Library Review, 62(3), 134-156.
23. Wells, A. (1997). Exploring the development of the independent, electronic, scholarly journal. Retrieved from http://papers.cumincad.org/cgi-bin/works/Show?2e09
24. Yalçın, Y. (2006). Elektronik veritabanlarında maliyet-fayda analizi: Başkent Üniversitesi Kütüphanesi. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
25. Yalçın, Y. (2016). İzmir Üniversitesi “Kütüphaneler ve İşbirlikleri /İzmir Üniversiteleri Platformu (İÜP) Örneği”. III. Mesleki Yenilenme Toplantısı.