Penile Fracture and False Penile Fracture: Is The Surgical Treatment Always Necessary?

Yıl 2016, , 174 - 177, 16.06.2016

Haci Polat

https://doi.org/10.5799/ahinjs.01.2016.02.0592

Öz

Objective: Penile fracture and “false penile fracture”
are two emergent cases with similar clinical features. The
differ­ential diagnosis is important to avoid unnecessary surgery. In
this study, we focused on understanding to distinguish between penile
fracture and “false penile fracture”.

Methods: We retrospectively examined the
clinicopathological features of 27 patients with a diagnosis of penile
frac­ture and “false penile fracture” between June 2012 and June 2015.

Results: Twenty-two patients were diagnosed with
penile fracture with 20 out of 22 patients undergoing surgical
treat­ment with no complications. Conservative treatment was applied to
two patients, however one patient developed erec­tile dysfunction. Five
patients were diagnosed with “false penile fracture”. Two patients
underwent surgical treatment and three patients underwent conservative
treatment. There were no complications in the five patients.

Conclusion: We suggest that surgical treatment is
needed for the treatment of penile fracture. However, there is no need
to surgical exploration for treatment of “false penile fracture”.
Conservative treatment is sufficient for “false penile fracture”. J Clin Exp Invest 2016; 7 (2): 174-177

Anahtar Kelimeler

penile disease, penile fracture, complications, erectile dysfunction, urology, emergency

Kaynakça

• 1. Eken A, Acil M, Arpaci T. Isolated rupture of the superficial vein of the penis. Can Urol Assoc J. 2014;8:E371-3. 2. Rafiei A, Hakky TS, Martinez D, et al. Superficial dorsal vein injury/thrombosis presenting as false penile fracture requiring dorsal venous ligation. Sex Med. 2014;2:182-5. 3. Armenakas NA, Hochberg DA, Fracchia JA. Traumatic avulsion of the dorsal penile artery mimicking a penile fracture. J Urol. 2001;166:619. 4. Kurkar A, Elderwy AA, Orabi H. False fracture of the penis: Different pathology but similar clinical presentation and management. Urol Ann. 2014;6:23-6. 5. Feki W, Derouiche A, Belhaj K, et al. False penile fracture: report of 16 cases. Int J Impot Res. 2007;19:471-3. 6. Pereira PA, Fentes PD, Caamaño TV, et al. Rupture of the superficial vein of penis: Therapeutic options. Arch Esp Urol. 2010;63:871-3. 7. Fergany AF, Angermeier KW, Montague DK. Review of Cleveland Clinic experience with penile fracture. Urology. 1999;54:352-5. 8. Cecchi M, Pagni GL, Ippolito C, et al. Fracture of the penis: description of a case. Arch Ital Urol Androl 997;69:137- 139. 9. Orvis BR, McAninch JW. Penile rupture. Urol Clin North Am. 1989;16:369-75. 10. Mazaris EM, Livadas K, Chalikopoulos D, et al. Penile fractures: immediate surgical approach with a midline ventral incision. BJU Int. 2009;104:520-3. 11. Savaş A, Efesoy O, Cayan F, Cayan S. Sexual injuries during consensual sexual activity. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2012;18:519-23.