In the Context of Bioethics and Biopolitics with Keeping Track of the Helsinki Declaration

Abstract

Bioethics and biopolitics derive from ethics, which constitutes their denominator but their choice and the application of the moral principles ranges from being simply different to being outright contradictory. In order to understand the interaction between bioethics and biopolitics, which has been repeatedly mentioned, we believe that it is important to examine the Declaration of Helsinki. When the revisions of the declaration are analyzed thoroughly, especially when the differences between the 2008 and 2013 revisions are examined, it is possible to see how bioethics and politics contradict and/or overlap each other in the world of clinical research. In 1952 ethics commission was established under WMA (World Medical Association), in 1961 an outline of text about use of human subjects and researches on human being was created to be a guideline for physicians. This text has been declared at the 18th General Assembly of the WMA (Helsinki 1964). In our study, in the light of this document, we will evaluate with a critical perspective, the revision in 2013 and the WMA’s biopolitics concerns relating to reserch on human subject. We will scent out the traces of the capitalism on the health and health care era. J Clin Exp Invest 2016; 7 (1): 110-118

Keywords

• Helsinki declaration,biomedical research,bioethics,biopolitics

Kaynakça

1. 1. World Medical Association. http://www.wma.net/ en/60about/70history/index.html. (Erişim Tarihi: 01.03.2015).
2. 2. World Medical Association. http://www.wma.net/en/60 about/70history/01declarationHelsinki/ (Erişim Tarihi: 01.03.2015).
3. 3. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. J Am Med Assoc 2013; 310(20): 2191-2194.
4. 4. Carlson RV, Boyd KM, Webb DJ. The Revision of the Declaration of Helsinki: past, present and future, Brit J Clin Pharmacol 2004;57:695-713.
5. 5. Sağlıkla İlgili Uluslararası Belgeler. Türk Tabipler Birliği Yayınları, 2009:20-22.
6. 6. National Institutes of Health’s. http://history.nih.gov/research/downloads/helsinki.pdf. (Erişim Tarihi: 16.07.2014).
7. 7. Usubütün A. Dünya Tabipler Birliği Helsinki Bildirgesi İnsan Denekler Üzerinde Biyomedikal Araştırma Yapan Hekimler İçin Öneriler, Türk Patoloji Derg 1998;14:51-52.
8. 8. Gürgan M. Helsinki Bildirgesi’nin 2013 Sürümündeki Değişiklikler, Türkiye Biyoetik Dergisi 2014;1:100-104.

9. 9. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Bull World Health Org 2001;79:373-374.
10. 10. Başkent Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi. http://tip.baskent.edu.tr/ arastirma/ysldzn/helsinki.pdf. (Erişim Tarihi: 16.07.2014).
11. 11. Türk Toraks Derneği. http://www.toraks.org.tr/ uploadFiles/2122011193327-1104helsinki_bildirge.pdf. (Erişim Tarihi: 16.07.2014).
12. 12. World Medical Association. http://www.wma.net/ en/30publications/10policies/b3/17c.pdf. (Erişim Tarihi: 16.07.2014).
13. 13. World Medical Association. http://www.wma.net/ en/30publications/10policies/b3/. (Erişim Tarihi: 16.07.2014).
14. 14. Büken NÖ, Büken E. “Uluslararası Araştırmalar, Araştırma Etiğinde Temel İkilemler ve Etik Kurullar” (International Researches, Fundamental Dilemmas in Research Ethics and Ethics Committees), Sendrom, 2008;20:37-47.
15. 15. Büken NÖ. “Klinik Araştırma Etik Kurulları” (Clinical Research Ethics Committees), Sendrom, 20 (3-4): 61-70, Mart-Nisan 2008.
16. 16. Büken NÖ, Civaner M, İlgili Ö ve ark. Biyoetik Kurulların Oluşturulması, Klavuz No.1 (Orijinal adı: Establishing Bioethics Committees-Guide No.1), UNESCO Türkiye Milli Komisyonu 2008:42-44.