Çin'in Arktik Anlatısının Tamamlayıcısı Olarak Bilim Diplomasisi Pratikleri

Öz

Bu çalışma, Çin'in çok yönlü Arktik anlatısını bilim diplomasisi perspektifinden incelemektedir. Çalışma Çin'in Arktik Bölgesi'ndeki gerekçeleri ile başlamakta, bilim diplomasisine eleştirel okuma yaparak kavramın zaman içindeki değişimini ele almaktadır. Arktik Bölgesi'nde bilim diplomasisi kavramının kullanılmasındaki gerekçelerin açıklanmasının ardından Çin’in Arktik anlatısı bilim diplomasisi nosyonu altında tartışılmaktadır. Çalışmanın ana sorusu, Çin'in bölgedeki meşruiyetini sağlamak için bilim diplomasisi pratiklerinde nasıl anlatılar kullandığıdır. Araştırma sorusu, geleneksel bilim diplomasi yaklaşımının yerine eleştirel bilim diplomasisi açıklamaları üzerinden tartışılmıştır. Çalışma, eleştirel bilim diplomasisi çalışmalarına katkıda bulunmaktadır. Çalışmanın sonucunda, Çin'in geleneksel bilim diplomasisini ele alan anlatısıyla Arktik kulübünde kendine yer edindiğini, ancak stratejik hedeflerinin yeni ortaya çıkan bilim diplomasi konseptiyle uyumlu olduğu ortaya koyulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çin
• bilim diplomasisi
• Arktik Bölgesi
• anlatı

China’s Arctic Narrative as a Component of its Science Diplomacy Practices

Öz

This study explores China's multifaceted Arctic narrative through the lenses of science diplomacy concept. The article starts with China's rationales in the Arctic Region, providing a critical reading of science diplomacy to demonstrate the evolution of the concept over time. After explaining the rationales behind the use of the science diplomacy concept in the Arctic Region, China's Arctic narrative is discussed under the umbrella of the science diplomacy concept. The main question of the study is how China uses narratives through its science diplomacy practices in order to justify its presence. Approaching the question through the emerging science diplomacy explanations rather than those of traditional ones, the study contributes both critical science diplomacy studies and China’s dovish standing the in the Arctic region on the ground of its Arctic narrative. The study concludes that, China enjoys the Arctic-club by using its narrative addressing traditional science diplomacy, while its ambitions strategically align with the emerging concept.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• China
• science diplomacy
• Arctic Region
• narrative

Kaynakça

1. Arctic Council. (1996). Ottawa Declaration. https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/items/fb29e6d2- d60c-43ca-8e46-fa7a505033e0
2. Babin, J., & Lasserre, F. (2019). Asian states at the arctic council: perceptions in western states. Polar Geography, 42(3), 145-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2019.1578290
3. Bennett, M. M. (2015). How china sees the arctic: reading between extraregional and intraregional narratives.
4. Geopolitics, 20(3), 645-668. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2015.1017757
5. Berkman, P. A. (2019). Evolution of science diplomacy and its local-global applications. European Foreign Affairs Review, 24(Special).
6. Bertelsen, R. G., Xing, L., & Gregersen, M. H. (2016). 22 Chinese Arctic science diplomacy. In Conde, E., & Sanchez, S. I. (Eds) Global Challenges in the Arctic Region: Sovereignty, environment and geopolitical balance, (pp. 442-464). Routledge.
7. Bertelsen, R.G. (2020). Science diplomacy and the Arctic. In Gjørv, G. H., Lanteigne, M., & Sam- Aggrey, H. (Eds.). Routledge Handbook of Arctic Security (pp. 120-135). Routledge. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781315265797
8. Brady, A. M. (2017). China as a polar great power. Cambridge University Press. https://doi. org/10.1017/9781316832004

9. Copeland, D. (2011). Science diplomacy: what’s it all about?. CEPI-CIPS Policy Brief, 13.
10. Copeland, D. (2016). Science diplomacy. In Constantinou, C. M., Kerr, P., & Sharp, P. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of diplomacy (pp. 628-641) Sage.
11. Dodds, K., & Nuttall, M. (2016). The scramble for the poles: The geopolitics of the Arctic and Antarctic. John Wiley & Sons.
12. Dodds, K., & Nuttall, M. (2019). The Arctic: what everyone needs to know®. Oxford University Press. https:// doi.org/10.1093/wentk/9780190649814.001.0001
13. Doshi, R., Dale-Huang, A., & Zhang, G. (2021). Northern expedition: china’s arctic activities and ambitions. The Brookings Institute. https://www.brookings.edu/research/northern-expedition-chinas-arctic- activities-and-ambitions/
14. Everett, K., & Halašková, B. (2022). Is it real? Science diplomacy in the Arctic states’ strategies. Polar Record, 58, e27.
15. Flink, T. (2020). The sensationalist discourse of science diplomacy: A critical reflection. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 15(3), 359-370.
16. Freeman, D. P. (2019). China and Science Diplomacy: An Emerging or Marginal Policy. European Leadership in Cultural, Science and Innovation Diplomacy. Institute for European Studies, Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
17. Gluckman, P. D., Turekian, V. C., Grimes, R. W., & Kishi, T. (2017). Science diplomacy: a pragmatic perspective from the inside. Science & Diplomacy, 6(4), 1-13.
18. Graczyk, P., & Koivurova, T. (2014). A new era in the Arctic Council’s external relations? Broader consequences of the Nuuk observer rules for Arctic governance. Polar Record, 50(3), 225-236. doi:10.1017/S0032247412000824
19. Hong, N. (2014). Emerging interests of non-Arctic countries in the Arctic: a Chinese perspective. The Polar Journal, 4(2), 271-286. Hong, N. (2018, March 16). China’s interests in the arctic: opportunities and challenges. Institute for China- American Studies. https://chinaus-icas.org/research/chinas-interests-in-the-arctic-opportunities- challenges/#:~:text=China’s%20interests%20range%20from%20participating,opportunities%20 and%20undertaking%20polar%20research.
20. Hong, N. (2020). China’s role in the Arctic: observing and being observed. Routledge. https://doi. org/10.4324/9780429328138
21. Ingenfeld, E. (2010). “Just in case” policy in the Arctic. Arctic, 63(2), 257-259. https://doi.org/10.14430/ arctic989
22. Ingimundarson, V. (2014). Managing a contested region: The Arctic Council and the politics of Arctic governance. The Polar Journal, 4(1), 183-198.
23. Jakobson, L. & Peng, J. (2012). China’s arctic aspirations. SIPRI. https://www.sipri.org/ publications/2012/sipri-policy-papers/chinas-arctic-aspirations
24. Kobzeva, M. (2019). China’s Arctic policy: Present and future. The Polar Journal, 9(1), 94-112.
25. Koivurova, T., Kauppila, L., Kopra, S., Lanteigne, M., Shi, M., Smieszek, M., ... & Nojonen, M. (2019, February 12). China in the arctic; and the opportunities and challenges for chinese-finnish arctic co-operation. Prime Minister´s Office.
26. Kopra, S. & M. Puranen (2021, March 18) China’s arctic ambitions face increasing headwinds in finland. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2021/03/chinas-arctic-ambitions-face-increasing-headwinds- in-finland/
27. Krasnyak, O. (2018). National styles in science, diplomacy, and science diplomacy: A case study of the United Nations Security Council P5 countries. Brill Research Perspectives in Diplomacy and Foreign Policy, 3(1), 1-100.
28. Kubny, H. (2023, Jul 24). China on its 13th arctic expedition. Polar Journal. https://polarjournal.ch/ en/2023/07/24/china-on-its-13th-arctic-expedition
29. Lackenbauer, P., Lajeunesse, A., Manicom, J., & Lasserre, F. (2018). China’s Arctic ambitions and what they mean for Canada. University of Calgary Press.
30. Lanteigne, M. (2014). China’s emerging arctic strategies: economics and institutions. Institute of International Affairs. https://ams.hi.is/en/publication/20/
31. Lanteigne, M. (2017). Walking the walk: science diplomacy and identity-building in Asia-Arctic relations. Jindal Global Law Review, 8(1), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41020-017-0043-1
32. Lanteigne, M. (2020, April 28). Identity and relationship-building in china’s arctic diplomacy. The Arctic Institute. https://www.thearcticinstitute.org/identity-relationship-building-china-arctic- diplomacy/
33. Rainwater, S. (2013). Race to the north: China’s Arctic strategy and Its implications. Naval War College Review, 66(2), 62-82.
34. Rüffin, N., & Rüland, A. L. (2022). Between global collaboration and national competition: Unraveling the many faces of Arctic science diplomacy. Polar Record, 58.
35. Sørensen, C. T. N. (2018, February). China as an arctic great power: potential implications for greenland and the danish realm. Royal Danish Defence College. https://research.fak.dk/esploro/outputs/ workingPaper/China-as-an-Arctic-Great-Power/991816012003741
36. Sørensen, C. T., & Klimenko, E. (2017). Emerging Chinese-Russian Cooperation in the Arctic. SIPRI Policy Paper, 46. State Council Information Office. (2018) China’s Arctic Policy. http://www.scio.gov.cn/32618/ Document/1618357/1618357.htm
37. Stensdal, I. (2016). Coming of age? asian arctic research, 2004–2013. Polar Record, 52(2), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247415000595
38. Su, P., & Mayer, M. (2018). Science diplomacy and trust building:‘science china’in the arctic. Global Policy, 9 (53), 23-28.
39. Suttmeier, R. P. (2010). From Cold War science diplomacy to partnering in a networked world: 30 years of Sino‐US relations in science and technology. Journal of Science and Technology Policy in China, 1(1), 18-28.
40. Svalbard Treaty, February 9, 1925.
41. The Royal Society (2010, January). New Frontiers in Science Diplomacy. https://royalsociety.org/~/ media/royal_society_content/policy/publications/2010/4294969468.pdf
42. Turekian V.C., Macindoe S, Copeland D, Davis LS, Patman RG, Pozza M (2015) The emergence of science diplomacy. In Davis LS, Patman RG (eds) Science diplomacy: new day or false dawn? (pp. 3–24). World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore, USGS. (2008, July 22). 90 billion barrels of oil and 1,670 trillion cubic feet of natural gas assessed in the arctic. https://www.usgs.gov/media/audio/90-billion-barrels-oil-and-1670-trillion-cubic-feet- natural-gas-assessed-arctic
43. Weidacher Hsiung, C. (2016). China and Arctic energy: drivers and limitations. The Polar Journal, 6(2), 243-258.
44. Willis, M., & Depledge, D. (2015). How we learned to stop worrying about china’s arctic ambitions: understanding china’s admission to the arctic council, 2004–2013. In Handbook of the politics of the Arctic (ss. 388-407). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857934741.00029
45. Wishnick, E. (2017). China’s interests and goals in the arctic: implications for the united states. Strategic Studies Institute. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1029172.pdf
46. Wright, D. C. (2011). The panda bear readies to meet the polar bear: china debates and formulates foreign policy towards arctic affairs and canada’s arctic sovereignty. Canadian Defence and Foreign Affairs Institute. https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/cdfai/pages/42/attachments/original/1413673951/The_ Panda_Bear_Readies_to_Meet_the_Polar_Bear.pdf?1413673951
47. Wright, D. (2018, September). The Dragon and Great Power Rivalry at the Top of the World: China’s Hawkish, Revisionist Voices Within Mainstream Discourse on Arctic Affairs, CGAI: Canadian Global Affairs Institute. Canada. https://www.cgai.ca/the_dragon_and_great_power_rivalry_at_the_top_of_the_world
48. Young, O. R. (2019). Is it time for a reset in arctic governance?. Sustainability, 11(16), 4497. https://doi. org/10.3390/su11164497
49. Hong, N. (September 10, 2019). A Shift of U.S. Arctic Policy: Can the China Card Be Played Wisely?. Institute for China-America Studies. https://chinaus-icas.org/research/a-shift-of-us-arctic-policy- can-the-china-card-be-played-wisely/.