ASSESSMENT OF ARTISTS’ SOCIOECONOMIC AND WORKING CONDITIONS: THE EMPIRICAL CASE OF LITHUANIA

Abstract

The main aim of this research is to explore existing methodologies for artists’ labour force and create artists’ socio-economic and creative conditions an assessment model. Artists have a dual aims in their creative working process: 1) income, and 2) artistic self-expression. The valuation of their conditions takes into consideration both sides: the factors related to income and the satisfaction for creative process and its result. The problem addressed in the study: tangible and intangible artists' criteria used for assessments creativity conditions. The proposed model includes objective factors (working time, income, etc.) and subjective factors (salary covering essential needs, self-satisfaction). Other intangible indicators taken into account: the impact on the common culture, social values, and the possibility to receive awards, to represent the country in the international market. The empirical model consists of 59 separate indicators, grouped into eight categories. The deviation of each indicator from the general evaluation allows identifying the strongest and the weakest components of artists’ conditions.

Keywords

• artist conditions
• artistic labour force
• cultural policy
• indicator
• assessment model

Kaynakça

1. Bille, T. (2020). Artist's labour markets. In T. N. Ruth Towse, Handbook of Cultural Economics, 3rd edition. Rotterdam: Elgar.
2. Baldin, A., & Bille, T. (2018). A latent class analysis of visual artists' working and living conditions. ACEI. Melbourn: ACEI.
3. Banhamou, F. (2011). Artist's labour markets. In R. Towse, A Handbook of Cultural Economics (pp. 69-74). Edward Elgar Publishing.
4. Caves, R. (2000). Creative Industries: Contracts Between Art and Commerce. Harvard University Press.
5. Hesmondhalgh, D. (2013). The Cultural Industries (3rd. ed). London: Sage Publications.
6. Frey, B. S., Pommerehne W.W. (1989). Muses and Markets: Explorations in the Economics of the Arts. Blackwell, Oxford.
7. Menger, P. (2006). Artistic labour markets: contingent work, excess supply and occupational risk management. In G. V.A., & T. D., Handbook of Economics of Art and Culture. Volume I (pp. 765-811). Elsevier.
8. Throsby, D. Z. (2010). Do you really expect to be paid? An economical study of professional artists in Australia. Australia Council for Arts.

9. Throsby, D. (2010). Economic analysis of artists' behaviour: some current issues. Revue d'economie politiquw, 47-56.
10. Steiner, L., & Schneider, L. (2013). The happy artist: an empirical application. Journal of cultural economics, 225-246.
11. Rosen, S. (1981). The Economics of Superstars. The American Economic Review, 845-858.
12. Throsby, D. (2001). Defining the artistic workforce: The Australian experience. Poetics, 255-271.
13. Viešosios politikos ir vadybos institutas (Public Policy and Management institute) (2013). Jaunųjų menininkų socialinė ir kūrybinė padėtis Lietuvoje. Kultūros tyrimai. Viešosios politikos ir vadybos institutas.
14. Throsby, D., Zwar, J., Longden, Th. (2015). Book Authors and their Changing Circumstances: Survey Method and Results. Macquarie University.
15. The Arts Council of Northen Ireland. (2010). The Living and Working Conditions of Artists in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland. The Arts Council of Northen Ireland.
16. The Swedish Arts Grants Commitee. (2016). A study of artist's working environment. Stockholm: The Swedish Arts Grants Commitee.
17. The Swedish Arts Grants Committee. (2018). Artists in Sweden: Demographics, Earnings and Social Status. Stockholm: The Swedish Arts Grants Committee.
18. Holden, J. (2015). The Ecology of Culture. A Report commissioned by the Arts and Humanities Research Council's Cultural Value Project. Whiltshire: Polaris House.