PERFORMANCE AUDIT’S PERCEIVED CONCEPT AND ROLE EXPECTATION: IS IT CONFORMITY OR CONFLICT?

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2, 79 - 96, 30.09.2022

Diandra Talita Spama , Dyah Ekaari Sekar Jatiningsih

https://doi.org/10.46959/jeess.1054790

Öz

Extant accounting literature has broadly investigated expectation gap in audit context. Previous research reveals the existence of conflict which refer to role concept whether in the expectation of auditor role, response to audit output, or understanding of auditee’s business process. Meanwhile, observation from internal organization’s point of view is still limited whereas the urgency of evaluating performance and maintaining organizational excellence are escalating. Examining performance audit in service organization, this study qualitatively observed perception and expectation of stakeholders on performance audit concept using role theory framework. Role theory posits some propositions in relation to patterns of behavior to which individuals can be in conformity or can be in conflict in terms of compatibility to expectation of others. Semi structured interview with participant’s observer is performed in this study to investigate key stakeholders in the organization. Interesting result emerges which shows the existence of practicality concept instead of conformity. In addition, expectation of such impact from performance evaluation is equally the same among different stakeholders except on the perceived quantity measure. Important implication of this study result is further discussed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Performance Audit, Role Theory, Stakeholder, Conformity, Practicality

Kaynakça

• Reference1 Anjasari, S. P., & Andriati, H. N. (2016). “Pengaruh Tata Kelola Perusahaan dan Kinerja Lingkungan terhadap Nilai Perusahaan”, Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan daerah, 11(2), 52-59.
• Reference2 Badan Pusat Statistik. (2021). “Berita Resmi Statistik: Tingkat Pengangguran Terbuka (TPT) sebesar 7,07 persen”, Retrieved May 31, 2021, from Badan Pusat Statistik: https://www.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2020/11/05/1673/-revisi-per-18-02-2021--agustus-2020--tingkat-pengangguran-terbuka--tpt--sebesar-7-07-persen.html.
• Reference3 Bastian, I., & dkk. (2018). “Metoda Wawancara. In J. M. Hartono, Metoda Pengumpulan Dan Teknik Analisis Data”, (p. 62). Yogyakarta: Penerbit ANDI (Anggota IKAPI).
• Reference4 Biddle, B. J. (1986). “Recent Developments in Role Theory”, Annual Review of Sociology, 67-92.
• Reference5 Burrel, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). “Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis: Elements of The Sociology of The Corporate Life”, Heinemann.
• Reference6 Gaspersz, V. (2011). “Sistem manajemen kinerja terintegrasi balanced scorecard dengan malcolm baldrige dan lean six sigma supply chain management”, PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
• Reference7 Gendron, Y., Cooper, D., & Townley, B. (2001). “In the name of accountability-State auditing, independence and new public management”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(3), 278-310.
• Reference8 Global.theiia.org. (2021). “Definition of Internal Auditing. Retrieved April 13, 2021, from The Institute of Internal Auditors”, https://global.theiia.org/standards-guidance/mandatory-guidance/Pages/ Definition-of-Internal-Auditing.aspx.
• Reference9 Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). “A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts”, Academy of management journal, 50(2), 327-347.
• Reference10 Guarini, F., Magli, F., & Francesconi, A. (2020). “Academic logics in changing performance measurement systems: an exploration in a university setting”, Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management.
• Reference11 Hair, J. F., Bush, R. P., & Ortinau, D. J. (2003). “Marketing Research: Within a Changing Information Environment”, Hill Higher Education.
• Reference12 Haksama, S., Lusno, M., Prayoga, D., Farid, M., Sheyta, S., Shedysni, S., & Mudjanarko, S. W. (2018). “Analisis Kinerja Unit Rawat Inap Rumah Sakit X Berdasarkan Kriteria Malcolm Baldrige”, Jurnal Sain Health, 2(2), 12-20.
• Reference13 Hatherly, D., & Parker, L. (1988) “Performance Auditing Outcomes: A Comparative Study”, Financial Accountability & Management, 4(1), 21-41.
• Reference14 Kartamulja, A. (2001). “Peranan Audit Kinerja Dalam Meningkatkan Efisiensi Dan Efektivitas Bandung Urban Development Project”, Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, 5(2), 161-180.
• Reference15 Khelil, I., & Khlif, H. (2020). “Internal auditors’ perceptions of their role as assurance providers: a qualitative study in the Tunisian public sector”, Meditari Accountancy Research.
• Reference16 Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). “Naturalistic inquiry”, Sage publication.
• Reference17 Lindeberg, T. (2007). “The ambiguous identity of auditing”, Financial Accountability & Management, 23(3), 337-350.
• Reference18 Mays, Nicholas, & Pope, C. (2000). “Assessing Quality in Qualitative Research”, British Medical Journal, 50.
• Reference19 Mead, G. (1934). “Mind, Self and Society”, Chicago Press.
• Reference20 Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). “Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook”, Sage Publication.
• Reference21 Morin, D. (2014). “Auditors General’s impact on administrations: a pan-Canadian study (2001-2011)”, Managerial Auditing Journal, 29(5), 395-426.
• Reference22 Nastiti, T. (2018). “Observasi Partisipasi Sebagai Metoda Pengumpulan Data”, In J. Hartono, Metoda Pengumpulan dan Teknik Analisis Data. (p. 31). Yogyakarta: Penerbit ANDI (Anggota IKAPI).
• Reference23 Natalia, P. (2012). “Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Pengungkapan Corporate Governance Pada Laporan Tahunan (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan yang Terdaftar dalam LQ-45 Bursa Efek Indonesia)”, Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 1(2), 1-10.
• Reference24 Nurdiani, N. (2014). “Teknik sampling snowball dalam penelitian lapangan”, ComTech: Computer, Mathematics and Engineering Applications, 5(2), 1110-1118.
• Reference25 Oliver, C. (1991). “Strategic responses to institutional processes”, Academy of management review, 16(1), 145-179.
• Reference26 Pratama, W. (2019). “Perception of Auditors and Auditee on Public Sector Performance Audits”, Policy & Governance Review, 3(1), 60-27.
• Reference27 Pratolo, S. (2015). “Audit Kinerja Manajemen “Konsep dan Aplikasinya”, Yogyakarta: LP3M UMY.
• Reference28 Robson, C. (2017). “Small-scale evaluation: Principles and practice”, Sage publication.
• Reference29 Santosa, M. (2020). “The Critical Role of Internal Audit: Lead in Times of Uncertainty and Crisis. In I. A. INDONESIA, IAI Peduli Covid-19 dari perspektif Akuntan Kontribusi Pemikiran Akuntan Indonesia Refleksi 63 Tahun IAI (1957-2020)”, (pp. 298-307), Jakarta: IKATAN AKUNTAN INDONESIA.
• Reference30 Sari, L., & Widyastuti, T. (2018). “Expectation Gap pada Persepsi Auditor Internal dengan Auditee terkait Kompetensi, Independensi, dan Kualitas Audit”, Jurnal Riset Akuntansi & Perpajakan (JRAP), 5(01), 53-64.
• Reference31 Sugesti, H., & Anggraeni, A. (2020). “Implementasi Pengukuran Kinerja Model Malcolm Baldrige untuk Kinerja Unggul dalam Meningkatkan Keunggulan Bersaing di PT Pos Indonesia”, Sosio e-Kons, 12(1), 1-9.
• Reference32 Syarief, A. (2017). “Dampak Potensial Audit Kinerja Terhadap Peningkatan Pelayanan Publik Politeknik Negeri Bandung”, JRAK (Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Bisnis), 3(1), 45-52.
• Reference33 Tolo, Y. (2018). “Persepsi Audit Expectation Gap Auditor Internal dengan Auditee atas Kinerja Auditor Internal”, Jurnal Buletin Studi Ekonomi, 23(1), 108-123.
• Reference34 Utami, P. (2014). “Analisis Pengaruh Enam Kriteria Lainnya Dalam Malcolm Baldrige Criteria for Performance Excellence (MBCfPE) Terhadap Kepemimpinan Pada PT. Krakatau Steel (Persero) Tbk”, Skripsi.