Exploring E-tutors' Technological Knowledge of the Design Process to Facilitate the Design Step to Advance Giftedness of students in an ODeL Education

Year 2021, , 39 - 48, 30.12.2021

Mpipo Sedio

https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1021319

Abstract

In an ODeL context, the design step of the design process is regarded as a vital component that should be taught in the Technology curriculum. Teaching the design step in an ODeL setting places specific expectations on qualified e-tutors who can prepare students for the workplace. The central question of this research is "How does e-tutors' technical knowledge influence effective teaching and learning of the design step?" The study focused on postgraduate students enrolled in a semester module in 2020. An online survey was used to investigate the technological expertise of e-tutors in order to facilitate the design process step for advancing giftedness in students in an ODeL setting. The information gathered from five e-tutor sites was analyzed. The findings reveal that e-tutors in ODeL settings lack the ability to choose technologies that will help students understand the design step content. Suggestions: based on the present model, an alternate technique for e-tutor appointments is proposed.

Keywords

technological knowledge, e-tutoring, design process, design step, open and distance e-Learning

References

• Alok, A. (2021). Sketching- an iterative tool for engineering problem solving. Journal of Engineering Education Transformation, 34(4), 51 – 57.
• Anamova, R. R. (2021). Engineering and graphic education during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: challenges and opportunities. AIP Conference Proceedings 2389, 100007. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0063501
• Baker, A. H., & Kassimer, J. L. (2021). Using a connected learning framework to promote democratic education during a transition to online learning. Middle Grades Review, 7(1),1-15. https://scholarsworks.uvm.edu/mgreview/vol7/iss1/2.
• Benning, L., Linsell, C., & Ingram, N. (2018). Using technology in mathematics: professional development for teachers. In Hunter, J., Perger, P., & Darrah, L. (Eds), Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference for Mathematics Education Research Group of Australia (MERGA) making Waves, Opening Spaces (pp.146- 153). Auckland.
• Department of Basic Education. (2011). Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement. (CAPS). Technology. Grades 7-9. Department of basic Education: Pretoria.
• Evans, P., & Sonderlund, C. (2021). Prototyping remotely together with 2d, 3d and immersive virtual reality design tools. International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education. 9-10 September.
• Franchuk, N.P. & Prydacha, T.V. (2020). Organization and conduct of classes in educational institutions during distance learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1-11. Doi;10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012054.
• Han, J., Gu, L. Y., Chen, D. (2021). Application of innovative design thinking in product design, intelligent waste-paper recycling machine design case. 1-5. E3S Wed Conference. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3scomf/202123604062
• Haj-Yahya, A. (2021). Can a number of diagrams linked to a proof task in 3d geometry improve proving ability? Mathematics Education Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00385-8.
• Hietajarvi, L., Lonka, K., Hakkarainen, K., Alho, K., & Salmela- Aro, K. (2020). Are schools alienating digitally engaged students? Longitudinal relations between digital engagement and school engagement. Frontline Learning Research, 8(1), 33-55.
• Kieman, N., Manches, A., Seery, M.K (2021). The role of visuospatial thinking in students’ predictions of molecular geometry, 1-14. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1039/DORP00354A.
• Komatsu, K., & Jones, K. (2020). Interplay between paper-and-pencil activity and dynamic- geography-environment use during generalisation and proving. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 6. 123-143.
• Kounlaxay, K., Shim, Y., Kang, S. J. Kwak, H. O & Kim, S. M. (2021). Learning media on mathematical education based on augmented reality. KS11 Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, 15(3),1015-1029.
• Lin, K. Y., Wu, Y. T., Hsu, Y.T., & Williams, P. J. (2021). Effects of infusing the engineering design process into STEM project-based learning to develop preservice technology teachers’ engineering design thinking. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1),1-15. http://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00258-9.
• Maré, S., & Mutezo, A.T. (2021). The effectiveness of e-tutoring in an open and distance e-learning environment: evidence from the university of south Africa. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 36(2), 164–180.
• Mohamad, T. (2021). “The eight grids: a new method to enhance students’ sketching skills in the schools of architecture. Architecture And Planning Journal (APJ), 27(1),1-13.
• Ocal, T., & Halmatov, M. (2021). 3d geometric thinking skills of preschool children. International Journal of Curriculum Instruction, 13(2), 1508-1526.
• Phillips, C., Sunderlin, D., & Addy, T. (2021). Adapting to new modes of teaching during COVID-19: developing instructional approaches that empower learners and facilitate virtual learning experiences. Journal of Transformative Learning, 8(1),10-21.
• Pittalis, M., & Christou, C. (2010). Types of reasoning in 3D geometry thinking and their relation in spatial ability. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(2), 191-212.
• Pownall, M. J., Brook, E. E., & Pashley, K. (2021). H.I.I.T, High intensity ideation training- facilitating group design ideation in a digital space. International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, 9-10 September, 2021. Via Design, Via University College, Herning, Denmark.
• Ravioloa, P., Simoneb, M.G., Mauroc, I., & Rondonotti, M. (2021). Blended Learning in Online Teaching. Design Strategies and Future Developments, Proceedings of the First Workshop on Technology Enhanced Learning Environments for Blended Education (teleXbe2021), January 21-22, 2021, Foggia, Italy. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2817/paper22.pdf.
• Rohendi, D., Utami, N., Anna, A., & Sukandar, A. (2021). Projection simulation media in technical drawing for vocational students. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 16(1), 385-397.
• Serrano, A., Chen, B., Wang, C., Piovarci., Seidel, H.P., Didyk, P., & Myszkowski, K. (2021). The effect of shape and illumination on material perception; model and applications. ACM Trans. 40(4), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450626.3459813
• Smith, S., Talley, K., Ortiz, A., & Sriraman, V. (2021). You want to teach me to engineering? Impacts of recurring experiences on K-12 teachers’ engineering design self-efficacy. Familiarity with engineering, and confidence to teach with design -based learning pedagogy. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 11(1), 26-44. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1241.
• Sung, T. R., Kelly, T. R. & Han, J. (2019). Influence of sketching instruction on elementary students’ design cognition: a study of three sketching approaches. Journal of Engineering Design, 30(6), 199 – 226.
• Taraszkiewicz, A. (2021). Freehand drawing versus digital design tools in architectural teaching. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 23(2), 100-105.
• Tyrus, Y. V., & Harasymenko, I. V. (2021). Approaches, models, methods and means of training of future IT-specialists with the use of elements of dual education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series in Press.
• Vegliante, R., Sannicandro, K. (2020). The role of the e-tutor in the university context and in distance learning: an exploratory research. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 16(3),76-85.
• Xueting, L., Sifei, L., Kihwan, K., Shalini, D.M., Varun J., Yang, M., Kautz, J. (2020). Self-supervised single view 3d reconstruction via semantic consistency. asXiv preprint arXiv:203.06473,
• Zhaldak, M.I., Franchuk, V.M., & Franchuk, N.P. (2021). Some applications of cloud technologies in mathematical calculations. Journal of Physics: Conference Series In press.
• Zhang, H., Zhou, H., Zhou, Z., Zeng, H., Zhang, X, Yang, J & Lei, H. S., Han, F.S. (2021). Energy absorption diagram characteristic of metallic self-supporting 3D lattices fabricated by additive manufacturing and design method of energy absorption structure. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 226-235.