Impact of language learning strategies on technology addiction and coping skills in gifted adolescents

Abstract

Aim of this study is to examine the effect of language learning strategies on technology addiction and coping skills in gifted adolescents. In this regard, relational screening model was implemented in this study. The study group of the research consisted of 246 adolescents between the ages of 10-18 who were studying in Science and Art Centers and who volunteered to be included in the present research. The relevant data were obtained by applying ‘Demographic Information Form’, ‘Technology Addiction Survey’, ‘Language Learning Strategies Inventory’, and ‘Coping Scale for Adolescents’. Independent sample t-test was used to compare the averages of two groups in demographic variables; One-way ANOVA test result was used to compare more than two independent groups. Both univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to evaluate the predictability of the dependent variable by the independent variable(s). Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated in the relationship analysis of the scales. The analysis of the data revealed that the level of technology addiction of adolescents was significantly high. Negative coping and avoidant coping levels of adolescents were significantly high. Active coping levels were found to be significantly low. According to the results obtained when technology addiction and coping skills of gifted adolescents were investigated, we determined a negative and significant relationship between technology addiction and active coping. There was a positive and significant relationship between technology addiction and negative coping. Some demographic variables significantly affected the development of technology addiction and coping strategies. In the current study, the importance of guiding gifted adolescents and developing awareness about language learning strategies for the development of active coping strategies was emphasized respectively. It is anticipated that the data obtained in the study will create an important information infrastructure in interventions related to technology addiction and coping skills in gifted adolescents.

Keywords

• gifted
• adolescence
• technology addiction
• coping skills

References

1. Akarsu, B. & Akarsu, B. (2019). Bilimsel araştırma tasarımı. Nicel, nitel ve karma araştırma yaklaşımları. İstanbul: Cinius Yayınları.
2. Alhaisoni, E. (2012). Language learning strategy use of Saudi EFL students in an intensive English learning context. Asian Social Science, 5 (13), 115-127.
3. Anda, D., Baroni, S., Boskin, L., Buchwald, L., Morgan, J., Ow, J., Siegel Gold, J., Weiss R. (2000). Stress, stressors and coping strategies among high school students. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 22:441–463
4. Aydın, F. (2017). Teknoloji bağımlılığının sınıf ortamında yarattığı sorunlara ilişkin öğrenci görüşleri. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
5. Baker, J. A. (1995). Depression and suicidal ideation among academically gifted adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39(4), 218-223. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629503900405
6. Bedel, A., Işık, E. & Hamarta, E. (2014). Ergenler İçin Başa Çıkma Ölçeğinin (EBÇÖ) geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Eğitim ve Bilim 39(176), 227-235
7. Bickley, N. Z. (2002). The social and emotional adjustment of gifted children who experience asynchronous development and unique educational needs. Dissertation Abstracts International, 62(11), 11-27
8. Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction. Current Issues and Research Annual. Review of Applied Linguistic. 25, USA. 112-130.

9. Clark, B. (2015). Growing up gifted. Developing the potential of children at school and at home. Fatih Kaya ve Üzeyir Oğurlu (Tran.). Ankara: Nobel Yayınları
10. Çubukcu, Z. & Tosuntaş, Ş. (2018). Üstün yetenekli/zekâlı öğrencilerin eğitiminde teknolojinin yeri. Elektronik Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi. 7(13), 45-57
11. David, H. (2023). The failure of gifted education in Israel. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity,10(3), 141-155
12. Davis, S.K., Humphrey, N. (2012). The influence of emotional intelligence (EI) on coping and mental health in adolescence: Divergent roles for trait and ability EI. J. Adolesc. 35, 1369–1379
13. Demirekin, M. (2017). Yabancı dil olarak Türkçenin anlamlandırılmasında kelime ve dil öğrenme stratejileri kullanımı. Doktora Tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Yabancı Dil Olarak Türkçe Öğretimi Doktora Programı. Ankara.
14. Eren, F., Çete, A.Ö., Avcil, S. ve Baykara, B. (2018). Emotional and behavioral characteristics of gifted children and their families. Archives of Neuropsychiatry, 55(2), 105-117
15. Ersoy, E. & Deniz M. (2016). Üstün yetenekli çocukların öfkeyle başa çıkma ve karar verme becerilerinin bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Elementary Education Online, 15(3): 1017-1030
16. Gül, M. D., ve Ayık, Z. (2023). Enrichment studies in gifted education: a bibliometric analysis with studio. Participatory Educational Research 10(3), 266-284. http://www.perjournal.com DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17275/per.23.55.10.3
17. Hsiao, T. Y. & Oxford, R. L. (2002). Comparing theories of language learning strategies: A confirmatory factor analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 86 (3), 368–383.
18. Jonathan, R. (1988). The notion of giftedness – or ‘how long is a piece of string?’ British Journal of Educational Studies, 26, 2, pp. 111 - 125
19. Karabulut-Coşkun, B. & Akar, İ. (2022). Internet addiction in gifted students: a systematic review of the literature. Technology, Innovation and Special Education Research. 2(1), 78-92
20. Kocaman, O. & Kızılkaya Cumaoğlu, G. (2014). Yabancı dilde kelime öğrenme stratejileri ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(176), 293-303.
21. Koç, İ. (2015). Bilim ve Sanat Merkezi’ne devam eden üstün zekâlı/yetenekli öğrencilerin iletişim becerileriyle ilgili görüşleri. Üstün Yetenekliler Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(1), 39-53
22. Kurnaz, A. & Tepe, A. (2019). Examining internet addiction in gifted and talented students through different variables. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 6, 665−689 http://dx.doi.org/10.15805/addicta.2019.6.3.0025T
23. Larson, R.W., Moneta, G., Richards, M.H., Wilson, S. (2002). Continuity, stability, and change in daily emotional experience across adolescence. Child Development. 73:1151-1165
24. Mudrak, J., Zabrodska, K. (2015). Childhood giftedness, adolescent agency a systemic multiple-case study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(1), 1-17
25. Oğurlu, U., Kahraman, S. & Kayaalp, A. (2021). Computer game addiction in gifted students and non-gifted children: A caution for technology-oriented STEM activities. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), 7(2), 128-138. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.841669
26. Oxford, R. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury Hous Publishers
27. Parker, JDA, Endler NS. (1992). Coping with coping assessment: A critical review. Eur J Pers. 6(5): 321–44 Peterson, J., Duncan, N., & Canady, K. (2009). A longitudinal study of negative life events, stress, and school experiences of gifted youth. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(1), 34-49
28. Pfeiffer, S.I. (2002). Identifying gifted and talented students. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19(1), 31- 50. https://doi.org/10.1300/J008v19n01_03
29. Renzulli, S. J. (1998). The three-ring conception of giftedness. In S. M. Baum, S. M. Reis & L. R. Maxfield (Eds.). Nurturing the gifts and talents of primary grade students (pp. 133-172). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
30. Robinson, N. M. (2008). Early childhood. In J. A. Plucker & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says (pp. 179-194). Prufrock Press
31. Siegle, D. (2015). Technology: Learning can be fun and games. Gifted Child Today, 38(3), 192-197.
32. Şahin, F. (2018). İnternet kullanımı ve bilgisayar oyun bağımlılığının üstün zekalı ve yetenekli çocukların okul sosyal davranışlarına etkisi. Yüksek lisans tezi, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, İstanbul
33. Şavran, T. G. (2010). Bilimsel araştırmalarda amaç, problem ve sınırlılıklar. sosyolojide araştırma yöntem ve teknikleri. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları, Eskişehir.
34. Tam, K. (2013). A study on language learning strategies of university students of Hong-Kong. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 11 (2), 1-42.
35. Taşdemir, L. (2017). Özel yetenekli öğrencilerin bilgisayara yönelik tutumları ve teknoloji ile kendi kendine öğrenmeleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Yüksek lisans tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara
36. Tortop, H.S. (2014). Examining the effectiveness of in-service training program for the education of the academically gifted students in Turkey: A Case Study. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientist, 2(2), 67-86
37. Tortop, H.S. (2022). What should we understand from the concept of gifted young scientists education. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 10(2), 0-0.
38. Tsai, C., & Lin, S. (2003). Internet addiction of adolescents in Taiwan: An interview study. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 6(6), 649–652
39. Vucenovic, D., Sipek, G., Jelic, K. (2023). The role of emotional skills (competence) and coping strategies in adolescent depression. Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ. 13, 540–552. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/ejihpe13030041
40. Weinstein, C. & Mayer, R. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. in: wittrock, m., ed., handbook of research on teaching, Macmillan, New York, 315-327.
41. Worrell, F.C., Subotnik, R.F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P. & Dixson, D.D. (2018). Gifted Students. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 551–576. https://doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418- 102846
42. Yavuz, O. (2018). Özel yetenekli öğrencilerde internet ve oyun bağımlılığı ile algılanan sosyal destek düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Yaşam Becerileri Psikoloji Dergisi, 2(4), 281-296.
43. Zammuner, V.L. (2019). Adolescents’ coping strategies influence their psychosocial well-being. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology. 36(3): 1-17
44. Zimlich, S. L. (2016). Motivating gifted students: Technology as a tool for authenticity and autonomy. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 15(13), 1-11.