Gender Description on Problem-Solving Skills in Chemistry Learning Using Interactive Multimedia

Year 2020, , 571 - 589, 15.03.2020

Gunawan Gunawan , Ratna Azizah Mashami Lovy Herayanti

https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.627095

Cited By: 2

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the effect of interactive multimedia on problem-solving skills based on gender. The sample was chemistry education students in IKIP Mataram that consisted of 10 males and females’ students each. This study was pre-experimental research with a pretest-posttest one group design. Data collection was obtained by tests and interviews. The test of the problem-solving, in the form of the essay, was divided into three types, namely conceptual, algorithm, and conceptual-algorithm problems. Problem-solving was measured following the stages of Polya's problem-solving, namely understanding the problem, devising a plan, carrying out the plan, and looking back. The interview was conducted to gain more insight into their problem solving skill. Data were analyzed statistically using independent sample t-test and normalized gain scores (N-gain). The results of the analysis of the initial data obtained a significant value of 0.809, which indicated there was no difference between the problem-solving skills of male and female students. Meanwhile, the final data analysis obtained a significant value of 0.034 which means there was a difference between the problem-solving skills of the students. This furthermore showed that the use of interactive multimedia in chemistry learning increased the problem-solving skills of male better than the female. Moreover, male students’ problem-solving skills were higher than the females in all types of problems and at all stages of problem-solving. Due to interactive multimedia, the conceptual understanding and learning motivation of students is enhanced.

Keywords

Gender, Interactive Multimedia, Problem Solving Skills

References

• Alkan, F. & Altundağ Koçak, C. (2015). The role of technology in science teaching activities: web-based teaching applications. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 3(2), 1-7.
• Benölken, R. (2015). Gender- and giftedness-specific differences in mathematical selfconcepts, attributions and interests. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 464 – 473.
• Bodner, G. M., & Herron, J. D. (2004). Problem Solving in Chemistry. In Chemical Education: Research-based Practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Cheng, K. K., Thacker, B. A., Cardenas, R. L., Crouch, C., Cheng, K. K., Thacker, A., & Cardenas, R. L. (2004). Using an Online Homework System Enhances Students’ Learning of Physics Concepts in An Introductory Physics Course. American Journal of Physics, 72(11), 1447- 1455.
• Christophersen, K.-A., Elstad, E., Solhaug, T., & Turmo, A. (2015). Gender Variations in Norwegian Pre-Service Teachers' Motivational Orientations. Problems on Education in the 21st Century, 63, 17-28.
• Colagrande, E. A., Martorano, S. A., & Arroio, A. (2017). Views of A Group of Pre-service Science Teachers on the Use of Experimental Activities in Science Teaching. Problem of Education in the 21st Century, 75(6), 525-534.
• Dasilva, B.E., Ardiyati, T.K., Suparno, Sukardiyono, Eveline, E., Utami, T., & Ferty, Z.N. (2019). Development of Android-Based Interactive Physics Mobile Learning Media (IPMLM) with Scaffolding Learning Approach to Improve HOTS of High School Students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 659-681.
• Dole, S., Bloom, L. , & Kowalske, K. (2016). Transforming Pedagogy: Changing Perspectives from Teacher-Centered to Learner-Centered. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(1).
• Dostál, J. (2015). Theory of problem solving. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2798 – 2805. Funke J., Greiff S. (2017) Dynamic Problem Solving: Multiple-Item Testing Based on Minimally Complex Systems. In: Leutner D., Fleischer J., Grünkorn J., Klieme E. (eds)
• Competence Assessment in Education. Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment. Springer, Cham.
• Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2009). Introduction: Macro, submicro and symbolic representations and the relationship between them: Key models in chemical education. In Multiple representations in chemical education (pp. 1-8). Springer, Dordrecht.
• Gulacar, O., Bowman, C. R., & Feakes, D. A. (2013). Observational investigation of student problem solving: The role and importance of habits. Science Education International, 24(2), 344-360.
• Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., Herayanti, L., & Husein, S. (2019a). Problem-Based Learning Approach with Supported Interactive Multimedia in Physics Course: Its Effects on Critical Thinking Disposition. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 1075-1089.
• Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., Hermansyah, H., & Herayanti, L. (2019b). Guided Inquiry Model Through Virtual Laboratory to Enhance Students’ Science Process Skills on Heat Concept. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(2), 259-268.
• Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., Sahidu, H., & Herayanti, L. (2017). Virtual laboratory to improve students’ problem-solving skills on electricity concept. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 257-264.
• Gunawan, G., Suranti, N. M., Nisrina, N., Herayanti, L., & Rahmatiah, R. (2018b). The effect of virtual lab and gender toward students’ creativity of physics in senior high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108 012043.
• Guzel, B. Y., & Adadan, E. (2013). Use of multiple representations in developing preservice chemistry teachers’ understanding of the structure of matter. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 2(8), 109-130.
• Hair, J. F. Jr., William, C. B., Banin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th edition. Upper Saddle River- Prentice Hall. New Jersey.
• Hermansyah, H., Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., & Adawiyah, R. (2019). Guided inquiry model with virtual labs to improve students’ understanding on heat concept. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1153 (1), p. 012116.
• Husein, S., Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., & Wahyuni, S. (2019). Problem-Based Learning with Interactive Multimedia to Improve Students’ Understanding of Thermodynamic Concepts. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1), p. 012028.
• Izzati, U.A., Bachri, B.S., Sahid, M., & Indriani, D.E. (2019). Character Education: Gender Differences in Moral Knowing, Moral Feeling, and Moral Action in Elementary Schools in Indonesia. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 547-556.
• Manurung, S. R., & Mihardi, S. (2018). Improved Problem-Solving Ability after Using Interactive Multimedia in Teaching of Ideal Gas. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 11(36), 1-7.
• Mashami, R. A., & Gunawan, G. (2018). The Influence of Sub-Microscopic Media Animation on Students' Critical Thinking Skills Based on Gender. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108 (1), p. 012106.
• Mashami, R. A., Andayani, Y., & Gunawan, G. (2014). Pengaruh media animasi submikroskopik terhadap kemampuan representasi siswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Kimia "Hydrogen", 2(1), 149-152.
• Mayer, R. E. (2013). Problem Solving. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Mayer, R. E. (2014). Incorporating motivation into multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 171-180.
• Nizaruddin, Muhtarom, & Murtianto, Y. H. (2017). Exploring of Multi Mathematical Representation Capability in Problem Solving on Senior High School Students. Problem of Education in the 21st Century, 75(6), 591-598.
• OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. OECD Publishing.
• OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 Results (Volume V): Collaborative Problem Solving. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris.
• Osman, K., & Lee, T. T. (2013). Impact of interactive multimedia module with pedagogical agents on students’ understanding and motivation in the learning of electrochemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.
• Pekdağ, B. (2010). Alternative Methods in Learning Chemistry: Learning with Animation, Simulation, Video and Multimedia. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(2), 79-110.
• Romero, M. (2015). Work, games and lifelong learning in the 21st century. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 115 – 121.
• Slavin, R. E. (2009). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
• Taasoobshizari, G., & Glynn, S. M. (2009). College Students Solving Chemistry Problems: A Theoretical Model of Expertise. Journal of Research in Science Education, 46(10), 1070-1089.
• Tang, H., & Abraham, M. R. (2016). Effect of Computer Simulations at the Particulate and Macroscopic Levels on Students’ Understanding of the Particulate Nature of Matter. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(1), 31–38.
• Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299-321.
• Widiyatmoko, A. (2018). The Effectiveness of Simulation in Science Learning on Conceptual Understanding: A Literature Review. Journal of International Development and Cooperation, 24(1&2), 35-43.