Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2020, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 935 - 946, 15.06.2020
https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.711312

Abstract

References

  • Al–Zoubi, S. M., & Bani Abdel Rahman, M.S. (2016). Talented students' satisfaction with the performance of the gifted centers. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 4(1), 1-20.
  • Animal Science Teacher Profession Club. (2013). A report on an increase in animal rearing potential in colleges of agriculture and technology to be consistent with learner competency and entrepreneurs. Bangkok: Division of Vocational Teacher and Personnel Development, Office of Vocational Committee, Ministry of Education.
  • Carman, J. M. 2005. “Blended Learning Design: Five Key Ingredients.” Retrieved October 8, 2018, from https://www.agilantlearning.com/.
  • Dewey, J. (1958). Experience and Nature. Dover Publications: New York, NY, USA.
  • DuFour, Richard; Rebecca DuFour; Robert Eaker; Thomas W. Many; Mike Mattos. (2016). Learning by Doing: A Handbook for Professional Learning Communities at Work. (3rd Edition). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
  • Gatphayak, K. (2019). Farm Animals and the Environment. Changmai: Chiang Mai University Press. 328 pp.
  • iNACOL.(2009). A K-12 Leadership Series 2009. “Blended Learning: Where Online and Face-to-Face Instruction Intersect for 21st Century Teaching and Learning”. Retrieved October 9, 2018, from: http://www.monroe2boces.org/Downloads/bb_k12_wp_blendedlearning[1].pdf.
  • Khammanee, T. (2013). Teaching science: body of knowledge for process management effective learning. 19th edition, Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
  • Leekitwattana, P. (2012). Educational Research Methodology. 8th edition. Faculty of Industrial Education and Technology, King Mungkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok: Mean Service Supply Ltd. Partnership.
  • Mike Pegg. (2017). D is for John Dewey: His Approach to Education. Retrieved November 13, 2019, from https://www.thepositiveencourager.global/john-deweys-approach-to-doing-positive-work/.
  • Musika, A., Poungsuk, P., Siriwan, N., & Intorrathed, S. (2019). Relationship between Curriculum and Instructional Materials of Non-formal Agricultural Higher Education.Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 687-701. DOI:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3469-0930
  • National Workforce Data Center. (2015). Integrated Workforce Information Center. Ministry of Workforce. http://nlic.mol.go.th/th/index. (15 August, 2015).
  • Panyakom, R. (2014). Conditions and Problems of Farm Work in Agricultural Education Institutes. A seminar report on education in agriculture, Faculty of Industrial Education, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang.
  • Panyakom, R., Poungsuk, P., Intorrathed, S., and Hongmaneerat, K. (2017). Needs for Animal Farm Work Development of Northeastern Vocational Institute of Agriculture, Ministry of Education, Thailand. International Journal of Agricultural Technology. 13(7.2): 2031-2042.
  • Poungsuk, P. (2013). Philosophy of Sufficiency Economy and Agricultural Career Promotion. 3rd edition. Bangkok: Mean Service Supply Ltd. Partnership.
  • Poungsuk, P. (2017). Agricultural Education. Faculty of Industrial Education and Technology, King Mungkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok: Mean Service Supply Ltd. Partnership.
  • Poungsuk, P. (2018). School Farm Management. Bangkok: Department of Agricultural Education, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang
  • Punpinij, S. (2011). Research techniques in social science. 2nd Edition. Bangkok: Witthayaphat.
  • Ratchawet, A. et. al. (2018). Outcomes of the Learning Facilitation by Using POE Model together with Local Context entitle “Natural Rubber for Special Student Class, Upper Secondary School”. Education Journal, Prince of Songkhla University, Pattani campus. 29(2): pp.56-65.
  • Robroo, I. and Wattananarong, K. (2010). Developing a Module of Blended Teaching/Learning for Increased Efficiency in Self-knowledge Acquisition. Industrial Efficiency Journal, KMIUTBN 1(2), 13-15.
  • Saduak et al. (2017). Model for Development of Agricultural Skills under Occupation and Technology Subject (Agriculture) of Third Year Lower Secondary School Students using the School Agricultural Learning Center, Praibueng Wittayakom School, Srisaket Province, Thailand. International Journal of Agricultural Technology. 13(7.2), 1849-1855.
  • Saduak, W., Poungsuk, P., Phonpakdee, R. and Deeying, S. (2017). Problem Condition in the Agricultural Learning Center Using at Praibuengwittayakom School, Srisaket Province, Thailand. International Journal of Agricultural Technology. Vol. 13(7.2), 2117-2124.
  • Saduak, W., Poungsuk, P., Phonpakdee, R. and Deeying, S. (2019). School Agricultural Learning Center for Sustainable Agricultural Learning. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 389-407. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17478/jegys.2018.82
  • Siriwan, N. (2014). Miscellaneous that Education in Agriculture: Important Issues to be Revised, 2nd edition. Bangkok: Mean Service Supply Ltd. Partnership.
  • Siriwan, N. 1989. Farm Work: Key Strategies of Education in Agriculture. Bangkok: Ponchai Printing Center.
  • Siriwan, N. et. al. 1997. Needs for the Development of Demonstration Farms of Teachers and Farm Care-takers of Vocational Education, Ministry of Education. A research report. Department of Agricultural Education, Faculty of Industrial Education, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang.
  • Srisuwan C., Klompanya, A., and Poungsuk, P. (2019). Learning Activities on the Utilization of Farm Animal Waste Subject for Knowledge and Skill Development of Agricultural Techer Training Students. Proceeding of the 4th Conference on Research for Thai Education System; CRTES2019. King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang.
  • Strother B. J. (2003). Shaping Blended Learning Pedagogy For East Asian Learning Styles. In the Professional Communication Conference. 21-24 September 2003. Retrieved March 15, 2010, from http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/ 0.1109/IPCC.2003.1245513.
  • Thanapanyachatchawong, J. (1988). Principles of Agricultural Education. Songkhla; Department of Agricultural Development. Prince of Songkla University.
  • Theodore Struck, F. (2019). Farm Shop Work in Pennsylvania: A Study of Repair and Construction Work as Carried on by Farmers, and as Practiced in the Vocational Agriculture Schools of Pennsylvania. Forgotten Books. 94pp.
  • Tortop, H. S. (2013). Meaningful field trip in education of the renewable energy technologies. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists. 1(1), 8-15. DOI : 10.17478/JEYSG.201318998.
  • Webster, J. (2011). Management and Welfare of Farm Animals: The UFAW Farm Handbook. Wiley-Blackwell, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. publication. 616pp.
  • Wuttikorn, I., Ratchadakorn, P., Pakkapong, P., & Sirirat, P. (2019). Web Application of Knowledge Management in Broiler Production in Agriculture for Vocational Education. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 1249-1261. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17478/jegys.621360

A new way of agricultural farm work in the educational facilitation of dual education between vocational education and upper secondary school curricular programs

Year 2020, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 935 - 946, 15.06.2020
https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.711312

Abstract

TThis study aimed to compare learning achievement based on blended learning of dual education between vocational education and upper secondary school curricular programs in Agriculture. The sample groups were students learning through a new way of agricultural farm work and those learning agriculture through normal method. They were 90 sixth year upper secondary school students from Buntharik Wittayakhan School, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand obtained by purposive sampling. This study consisted of 3 steps: 1) investigation and development of model of a new way agricultural farm work (animal science and teaching form); 2) analysis of consistent components suitable for the development of a new form of animal farm work and teaching/learning form; and 3) using the model together with the integration between theories and teaching methods (Learning by doing, POE, Group process, Blended learning, and field trip). This also included learning through application multimedia for learning exchange and activity transfer. There was control group design after testing. The instrument of research were interview schedule, questionnaire, learning achievement test, set of learning activities, and observation form. Results of the study revealed that the students learning through the dual education or a new way of agricultural farm work had higher learning achievement than that of those who learned through a normal class with a significance level (p>0.01). This finding indicated that learning through a new way of agricultural farm work was very essential to the development of learning achievement and skills. It was also found that the students had a high level of satisfaction with the blended learning and it should be promoted as part of the dual education in agriculture.

References

  • Al–Zoubi, S. M., & Bani Abdel Rahman, M.S. (2016). Talented students' satisfaction with the performance of the gifted centers. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 4(1), 1-20.
  • Animal Science Teacher Profession Club. (2013). A report on an increase in animal rearing potential in colleges of agriculture and technology to be consistent with learner competency and entrepreneurs. Bangkok: Division of Vocational Teacher and Personnel Development, Office of Vocational Committee, Ministry of Education.
  • Carman, J. M. 2005. “Blended Learning Design: Five Key Ingredients.” Retrieved October 8, 2018, from https://www.agilantlearning.com/.
  • Dewey, J. (1958). Experience and Nature. Dover Publications: New York, NY, USA.
  • DuFour, Richard; Rebecca DuFour; Robert Eaker; Thomas W. Many; Mike Mattos. (2016). Learning by Doing: A Handbook for Professional Learning Communities at Work. (3rd Edition). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
  • Gatphayak, K. (2019). Farm Animals and the Environment. Changmai: Chiang Mai University Press. 328 pp.
  • iNACOL.(2009). A K-12 Leadership Series 2009. “Blended Learning: Where Online and Face-to-Face Instruction Intersect for 21st Century Teaching and Learning”. Retrieved October 9, 2018, from: http://www.monroe2boces.org/Downloads/bb_k12_wp_blendedlearning[1].pdf.
  • Khammanee, T. (2013). Teaching science: body of knowledge for process management effective learning. 19th edition, Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
  • Leekitwattana, P. (2012). Educational Research Methodology. 8th edition. Faculty of Industrial Education and Technology, King Mungkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok: Mean Service Supply Ltd. Partnership.
  • Mike Pegg. (2017). D is for John Dewey: His Approach to Education. Retrieved November 13, 2019, from https://www.thepositiveencourager.global/john-deweys-approach-to-doing-positive-work/.
  • Musika, A., Poungsuk, P., Siriwan, N., & Intorrathed, S. (2019). Relationship between Curriculum and Instructional Materials of Non-formal Agricultural Higher Education.Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 687-701. DOI:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3469-0930
  • National Workforce Data Center. (2015). Integrated Workforce Information Center. Ministry of Workforce. http://nlic.mol.go.th/th/index. (15 August, 2015).
  • Panyakom, R. (2014). Conditions and Problems of Farm Work in Agricultural Education Institutes. A seminar report on education in agriculture, Faculty of Industrial Education, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang.
  • Panyakom, R., Poungsuk, P., Intorrathed, S., and Hongmaneerat, K. (2017). Needs for Animal Farm Work Development of Northeastern Vocational Institute of Agriculture, Ministry of Education, Thailand. International Journal of Agricultural Technology. 13(7.2): 2031-2042.
  • Poungsuk, P. (2013). Philosophy of Sufficiency Economy and Agricultural Career Promotion. 3rd edition. Bangkok: Mean Service Supply Ltd. Partnership.
  • Poungsuk, P. (2017). Agricultural Education. Faculty of Industrial Education and Technology, King Mungkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok: Mean Service Supply Ltd. Partnership.
  • Poungsuk, P. (2018). School Farm Management. Bangkok: Department of Agricultural Education, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang
  • Punpinij, S. (2011). Research techniques in social science. 2nd Edition. Bangkok: Witthayaphat.
  • Ratchawet, A. et. al. (2018). Outcomes of the Learning Facilitation by Using POE Model together with Local Context entitle “Natural Rubber for Special Student Class, Upper Secondary School”. Education Journal, Prince of Songkhla University, Pattani campus. 29(2): pp.56-65.
  • Robroo, I. and Wattananarong, K. (2010). Developing a Module of Blended Teaching/Learning for Increased Efficiency in Self-knowledge Acquisition. Industrial Efficiency Journal, KMIUTBN 1(2), 13-15.
  • Saduak et al. (2017). Model for Development of Agricultural Skills under Occupation and Technology Subject (Agriculture) of Third Year Lower Secondary School Students using the School Agricultural Learning Center, Praibueng Wittayakom School, Srisaket Province, Thailand. International Journal of Agricultural Technology. 13(7.2), 1849-1855.
  • Saduak, W., Poungsuk, P., Phonpakdee, R. and Deeying, S. (2017). Problem Condition in the Agricultural Learning Center Using at Praibuengwittayakom School, Srisaket Province, Thailand. International Journal of Agricultural Technology. Vol. 13(7.2), 2117-2124.
  • Saduak, W., Poungsuk, P., Phonpakdee, R. and Deeying, S. (2019). School Agricultural Learning Center for Sustainable Agricultural Learning. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 389-407. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17478/jegys.2018.82
  • Siriwan, N. (2014). Miscellaneous that Education in Agriculture: Important Issues to be Revised, 2nd edition. Bangkok: Mean Service Supply Ltd. Partnership.
  • Siriwan, N. 1989. Farm Work: Key Strategies of Education in Agriculture. Bangkok: Ponchai Printing Center.
  • Siriwan, N. et. al. 1997. Needs for the Development of Demonstration Farms of Teachers and Farm Care-takers of Vocational Education, Ministry of Education. A research report. Department of Agricultural Education, Faculty of Industrial Education, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang.
  • Srisuwan C., Klompanya, A., and Poungsuk, P. (2019). Learning Activities on the Utilization of Farm Animal Waste Subject for Knowledge and Skill Development of Agricultural Techer Training Students. Proceeding of the 4th Conference on Research for Thai Education System; CRTES2019. King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang.
  • Strother B. J. (2003). Shaping Blended Learning Pedagogy For East Asian Learning Styles. In the Professional Communication Conference. 21-24 September 2003. Retrieved March 15, 2010, from http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/ 0.1109/IPCC.2003.1245513.
  • Thanapanyachatchawong, J. (1988). Principles of Agricultural Education. Songkhla; Department of Agricultural Development. Prince of Songkla University.
  • Theodore Struck, F. (2019). Farm Shop Work in Pennsylvania: A Study of Repair and Construction Work as Carried on by Farmers, and as Practiced in the Vocational Agriculture Schools of Pennsylvania. Forgotten Books. 94pp.
  • Tortop, H. S. (2013). Meaningful field trip in education of the renewable energy technologies. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists. 1(1), 8-15. DOI : 10.17478/JEYSG.201318998.
  • Webster, J. (2011). Management and Welfare of Farm Animals: The UFAW Farm Handbook. Wiley-Blackwell, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. publication. 616pp.
  • Wuttikorn, I., Ratchadakorn, P., Pakkapong, P., & Sirirat, P. (2019). Web Application of Knowledge Management in Broiler Production in Agriculture for Vocational Education. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 1249-1261. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17478/jegys.621360
There are 33 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Other Fields of Education
Journal Section Differentiated Instruction
Authors

Rongsan Panyakom This is me 0000-0002-7973-5653

Pakkapong Poungsuk 0000-0002-6876-7318

Sarawut Intorrathed This is me 0000-0002-3469-0930

Karn Hongmaneerat This is me 0000-0003-0435-2153

Publication Date June 15, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 8 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Panyakom, R., Poungsuk, P., Intorrathed, S., Hongmaneerat, K. (2020). A new way of agricultural farm work in the educational facilitation of dual education between vocational education and upper secondary school curricular programs. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), 935-946. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.711312
AMA Panyakom R, Poungsuk P, Intorrathed S, Hongmaneerat K. A new way of agricultural farm work in the educational facilitation of dual education between vocational education and upper secondary school curricular programs. JEGYS. June 2020;8(2):935-946. doi:10.17478/jegys.711312
Chicago Panyakom, Rongsan, Pakkapong Poungsuk, Sarawut Intorrathed, and Karn Hongmaneerat. “A New Way of Agricultural Farm Work in the Educational Facilitation of Dual Education Between Vocational Education and Upper Secondary School Curricular Programs”. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists 8, no. 2 (June 2020): 935-46. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.711312.
EndNote Panyakom R, Poungsuk P, Intorrathed S, Hongmaneerat K (June 1, 2020) A new way of agricultural farm work in the educational facilitation of dual education between vocational education and upper secondary school curricular programs. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists 8 2 935–946.
IEEE R. Panyakom, P. Poungsuk, S. Intorrathed, and K. Hongmaneerat, “A new way of agricultural farm work in the educational facilitation of dual education between vocational education and upper secondary school curricular programs”, JEGYS, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 935–946, 2020, doi: 10.17478/jegys.711312.
ISNAD Panyakom, Rongsan et al. “A New Way of Agricultural Farm Work in the Educational Facilitation of Dual Education Between Vocational Education and Upper Secondary School Curricular Programs”. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists 8/2 (June 2020), 935-946. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.711312.
JAMA Panyakom R, Poungsuk P, Intorrathed S, Hongmaneerat K. A new way of agricultural farm work in the educational facilitation of dual education between vocational education and upper secondary school curricular programs. JEGYS. 2020;8:935–946.
MLA Panyakom, Rongsan et al. “A New Way of Agricultural Farm Work in the Educational Facilitation of Dual Education Between Vocational Education and Upper Secondary School Curricular Programs”. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, vol. 8, no. 2, 2020, pp. 935-46, doi:10.17478/jegys.711312.
Vancouver Panyakom R, Poungsuk P, Intorrathed S, Hongmaneerat K. A new way of agricultural farm work in the educational facilitation of dual education between vocational education and upper secondary school curricular programs. JEGYS. 2020;8(2):935-46.
By introducing the concept of the "Gifted Young Scientist," JEGYS has initiated a new research trend at the intersection of science-field education and gifted education.