Scrutinizing the Changes in the Aggression of the Students of Schools of Sports Sciences studying at different Departments

Abstract

The objective of this study is to examine the aggressive behaviors and proclivity of the students of Faculty of Sports Sciences of Selçuk University, studying at different departments. The study group is constituted by total 349 students, being 155 males and 194 females, studying at different departments of Faculty of Sports Sciences of Selçuk University. While the personal information form was used for the socio-demographic information, a 7-item likert-type Aggression Scale developed by Kiper (1984) was utilized to obtain the values of aggression. Following testing the homogeneousness and variances of the data, Independent Sample t Test was used in identifying the changes for the gender factor, One-Way Anova for multiple comparisons, and Tukey HSD test in determining the source of the difference. The Crombach Alpha value for this study was determined as 0,82. Statistical changes were observed in the aggression values depending on the gender and department factors (p<0.05). While no change was found in the destructive aggression category in view of the gender variable, it was determined that the average values of males were statistically higher than females in the categories of assertiveness, passivity, and overall aggression (p<0.05). It was found that the students of the coaching department have the highest average value in the entire aggression subcategories and that the changes are statistically significant (p<0.05). In the light of such findings, it is considered that the new functional model charged by the society on females and males will be effective in the changes found between the male and female students, along with the  socio-cultural structure, social status, and roles. In addition, the reason for the changes depending on the department factor among the students can be considered as the fact that they are made subject to different recruitment criteria and examinations when being placed into departments, in addition to the differences of their sportive fields where they are studying. It is a noteworthy result that the aggression scores of the coaching students is high despite the fact that they take more practice-based classes. Regardless of its cause and source, sense of aggression must be considered as a sense and behavior that must be brought under control without reaching a dimension that inflicts damage on persons and the society.

Keywords

• Aggression,Sports,University Student

Kaynakça

1. Ağlamaz, T. (2006). High school students’ aggression point interms of examining self-disclosure, school type, sex, class level, parent’s education level and families monthly income level. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Samsun University, Samsun.
2. Anderson, C.A., & Bushman, B.J. (2002). Human Aggression, Annual Reviews of Psychology.
3. Atkinson, R.L., Atkinson, R.C., Smith, E.E., Bem, D.J., Hoeksema, S.N. (2002). Hilgard's Introduction to Psychology (Y. Alogan, Çev.). Ankara: Arkadaş Yayınevi. Cüceloglu D. (2005). Human and Behavior. Remzi Bookstore, Istanbul.
4. Dervent, F., Arslanoğlu, E., & Şenel, Ö. (2010) Agressivity levels of the high school students and relation with their participation to sport activities (Sample of Istanbul), Journal of Human Sciences, 7 (1), 523–525.
5. Efilti, E. (2006). Orta öğretim kurumlarında okuyan öğrencilerin saldırganlık, denetim odağı ve kişilik özelliklerinin karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Selçuk University, Konya.
6. Eroğlu, S. (2009). Saldırganlık davranışının boyutları ve ilişkili olduğu faktörler: lise ve üniversite öğrencileri üzerine karşılaştırmalı bir çalışma. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 21, 206- 221.
7. Freedman, J. L., Sears, D. O., Carlsmıth, J. M. (1998). Social Psychology (A. Dönmez, Çev.). Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
8. Gergen K.J., & Gergen M.M. (1986). Social Psychology (Second Edition). New York: Springer- Verlag,226.

9. Gönültaş, O., & Atıcı, M. (2014) Ortaokul son sınıf öğrencilerinin öfke düzeyleri ve saldırganlık düzeylerinin bazı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi, Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23 (1), 370-386.
10. Halıcı, P., Baran, G. (2006). Yatılı İlköğretim Bölge Okullarına Devam Eden ve Ailesiyle Birlikte Yaşayan 12-14 Yaş Grubundaki Çocukların Saldırganlık Eğilimlerinin İncelenmesi, Adli Psikiyatri Dergisi, 3(2), 23-30.
11. Hasta, D., & Güler, M. E. (2013). Saldırganlık: Kişilerarası ilişki tarzları ve empati açısından bir inceleme. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4 (1).
12. Karataş, Z. (2008). Lise Öğrencilerinde öfke ve Saldırganlık. Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17, (3).
13. Kiper, İ. (1984). Saldırganlık türlerinin çeşitli ekonomik, sosyal ve akademik değişkenlerle İlişkisi. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Ankara.
14. Kocatürk R. (1982) Saldırganlık güdüsünün spor ve eğitim alanında meslek seçimine etkisi, Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Ankara.
15. Krech, D.,Crutchfield, R.S. (1980). Sosyal Psikoloji Teori ve Problemler. (E. Güngör, Çev.). İstanbul: Ötüken Neşriyat.
16. Lorenz, K. (1968). Das Sogenannte Böse. Zur Naturgeschichte der Aggression. 1nd ed. Wien, Borotha-Schoeler Press, 21-22.
17. Partal, M., & Kılcıgil, E. (2003). Süper ligde oynayan bir futbol takımı taraftarlarının şiddete neden olan tahrik olma unsurları üzerine bir araştırma. Gazi Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2.
18. Tutkun, E., Güner, B.Ç., Ağaoğlu, S.A., & Soylu, R. (2010). Assessment on the Aggression Levels of the Sportspeople doing Team Sports and Individual Sports. Sports and Performance Studies Journal, 1(1), 23-29.
19. Yavuzer, H. (1992). Child Psychology. Istanbul: Remzi Publishing House.