Pre-service teachers' perceptions of social media – A qualitative survey study in Turkey and Sweden

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate pre-service teachers' perceptions of social media. The phenomenology approach, one of the qualitative research methods, was used in the study. The participants of the study included 201 pre-service teachers studying at two state universities, one in Turkey and the other in Sweden, in the spring term of the 2018-2019 academic year. In the study, metaphors were used to reveal pre-service teachers' perceptions of social media. The pre-service teachers were asked to fill in the following query: 'Social Media is like ……… because ………'. The collected qualitative data were analyzed by using content analysis method. The findings indicated that the pre-service teachers from both countries perceived social media mostly as a tool for communication and access to information and that a very few of them associated social media with education. In addition, it was found that pre-service teachers from Turkey had more negative perceptions of social media compared to those from Sweden. The pre-service teachers from Turkey who had negative perceptions associated social media mostly with addiction.

Keywords

• Social media
• Social networks
• Pre-service teachers
• Metaphor

References

1. Aghazamani, A. (2010). How do university students spend their time on Facebook? An exploratory study. Journal of American Science, 6(12), 730–735.
2. Alhabash, S., & Ma, M. (2017). A tale of four platforms: Motivations and uses of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat among college students?. Social Media and Society, 3(1), 1–13.
3. Al-Dhanhani, A., Mizouni, R., Otrok, H., & Al-Rubaie, A. (2015). Analysis of collaborative learning in social network sites used in education. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 5(1), 65.
4. Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alias, N., Othman, M. S., Marin, V. I., & Tur, G. (2018). A model of factors affecting learning performance through the use of social media in Malaysian higher education. Computers & Education, 121, 59–72.
5. Al-Rahmi, W., Othman, M., Yusof, L., & Musa, M. (2015). Using social media as a tool for improving academic performance through collaborative learning in Malaysian higher education. Review of European Studies, 7, 265–273.
6. Aydın, F. (2010). Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin coğrafya kavramına ilişkin sahip oldukları metaforlar. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 10(3), 1293–1322.
7. Balakrishnan, J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2017). Social media addiction: What is the role of content in YouTube?. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 6(3), 364–377.
8. Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer‐mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–30.

9. Caraher, K., & Braselman, M. (2010). The 2010 21st-Century Campus Report: Campus 2.0. 2010 CDW Government LLC. Retrieved from http://webobjects.cdw.com/webobjects/media/pdf/newsroom/CDWG-21st-Century-Campus-Report-0710.pdf.
10. Carpenter, J. (2015). Preservice teachers’ microblogging: Professional development via Twitter. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 15(2), 209–234.
11. Chou, H.T.G., & Edge, N. (2012). “They are happier and having better lives than I am”: The impact of using Facebook on perceptions of others’ lives. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(2), 117–121
12. Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & De Zuniga, H. G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 247–253.
13. Cramer, E. M., Song, H., & Drent, A. M. (2016). Social comparison on Facebook: Motivation, affective consequences, self-esteem, and Facebook fatigue. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 739–746.
14. Creswell, J. W. (2015). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri. (M. Bütün & S. B. Demir, çev. ed.). Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
15. Christensen, L. B., Johnson, B., & Turner, L. A. (2011). Research methods, design, and analysis. Pearson: New York.
16. Denti, L., Barbopuolos, I., Nilsson, I., Holmberg, L., Thulin, M., Wendeblad, M., & Davidsson, E. (2012). Sweden's largest Facebook study, Gothenburg Research Institute, Gothenburg (2012). Retrieved from https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/28893/1/gupea_2077_28893_1.pdf
17. Dyson, B., Vickers, K., Turtle, J., & Cowan, S. (2015). Evaluating the use of Facebook to increase student engagement and understanding in lecture-based classes. Higher Education, 69, 303–313.
18. Erdem, A., Alkan, M.F., & Erdem, Ş. (2017). The Perceptions of preservice teachers about the concept of social media. Karaelmas Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(1), 169–179.
19. Eynon, R., & Malmberg, L. (2011). A typology of young people's Internet use: implications for education. Computers and Education, 56(3), 585–595.
20. Foss, N., & Olson, M. (2013). The beliefs and perceived experiences of pre-service and early service teachers using Facebook. National Forum of Teacher Education Journal, 23(3), 1–16.
21. Gonzales, A. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2011). Mirror, mirror on my Facebook wall: Effects of exposure to Facebook on self-esteem. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 79–83.
22. Haferkamp, N., & Kramer, N. C. (2011). Social comparison 2.0: Examining the effects of online profiles on social-networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(5), 309–314.
23. Hamade, S. N. (2013). Perception and use of social networking sites among university students. Library Review, 62(6-7), 388–397.
24. Haneefa, M. K., & Sumitha, E. (2011). Perception and use of social networking sites by the students of Calicut University. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 31(4).
25. Hew, K. F. (2011). Students’ and teachers’ use of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 662–676.
26. Hosny, M.I., & Fatima, S. (2012). Facebook in education: Students, teachers, and library perspectives. Journal of Computing, 4(6), 78–86.
27. Hrastinski, S., & Aghaee, N. M. (2012). How are campus students using social media to support their studies? An explorative interview study. Education and Information Technologies, 17(4), 451–464.
28. Hughes, D. J., Rowe, M., Batey, M., & Lee, A. (2012). A tale of two sites: Twitter vs. Facebook and the personality predictors of social media usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 561–569.
29. Hughes, J. E., Ko, Y., Lim, M., & Liu, S. (2015). Preservice teachers’ social networking use, concerns, and educational possibilities: Trends from 2008-2012. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 23(2), 185–212.
30. Imlawi, J., Gregg, D., & Karimi, J. (2015). Student engagement in course-based social networks: The impact of instructor credibility and use of communication. Computers & Education, 88, 84–96.
31. Iordache, D. D., & Lamanauskas, V. (2013). Exploring the usage of social networking websites: perceptions and opinions of Romanian university students. Informatica Economică, 17(4), 18–25.
32. Ito, M., Horst, H. A., Bittanti, M., Danah, B., Herr Stephenson, B., Lange, P. G., Pascoe, C. J., & Robinson, L. (2009). Living and learning with new media. The MIT Press: London.
33. Jiao, Y., Gao, J., & Yang, J. (2015). Social value and content value in social media: two ways to flow. Journal of Advanced Management Science, 3(4), 299–306.
34. Kara, N., Çubukçuoğlu, B., & Elçi, A. (2020). Using social media to support teaching and learning in higher education: an analysis of personal narratives. Research in Learning Technology, 28.
35. Keçe, M. (2016). Facebook addiction among Turkish students. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 6(2), 123–132.
36. Kemp, S. (2020). Digital 2020: Global digital overview. We Are Social & Hootsuite. Retrieved from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2020-global-digital-overview
37. Khan, M. L. (2017). Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube?. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 236–247.
38. Kim, Y., Sohn, D., & Choi, S. M. (2011). Cultural difference in motivations for using social network sites: A comparative study of American and Korean college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 365–372.
39. Kircaburun, K. (2016). Effects of gender and personality differences on Twitter addiction among Turkish undergraduates. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(24), 33–42.
40. Kircaburun, K., Alhabash, S., Tosuntaş, Ş. B., & Griffiths, M. D. (2020). Uses and gratifications of problematic social media use among university students: A simultaneous examination of the Big Five of personality traits, social media platforms, and social media use motives. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 18(3), 525–547.
41. Kitsantas, A., Dabbagh, N., Chirinos, D. S., & Fake, H. (2016). College students’ perceptions of positive and negative effects of social networking. In Social networking and education (pp. 225-238). Springer, Cham.
42. Köseoğlu, P. (2018). An analysis of prospective teachers’ perceptions concerning the concept of “social media” through metaphors. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 45–52.
43. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2005). Metaforlar Hayat, Anlam ve Dil, (Cev: Demir, G.Y.). Istanbul: Paradigma Yayincilik.
44. Lee, C.C., Chou, S.T.H., & Huang, Y.R. (2014). A study on personality traits and social media fatigue-example of Facebook users. Lecture Notes on Information Theory, 2(3), 249–253.
45. Lin, M.F.G., Hoffman, E.S., & Borengasser, C. (2013). Is social media too social for class? A case study of Twitter use. TechTrends, 57(2), 39–45.
46. Lipsman, A. (2007). Facebook sees flood of new traffic from teenagers and adults. ComScore. Retrieved from http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Press_Releases/2007/07/Teenagers_and_Adults_Flood_Facebook
47. Luo, T., Sickel, J., & Cheng, L. (2017). Preservice teachers’ participation and perceptions of Twitter live chats as personal learning networks. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 61(3), 226–235.
48. Madge, C., Meek, J., Wellens, J., & Hooley, T. (2009). Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: “It is more for socialising and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work.” Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 141–155.
49. Matzat, U., & Vrieling, E. M. (2016). Self-regulated learning and social media–a ‘natural alliance’? Evidence on students’ self-regulation of learning, social media use, and student–teacher relationship. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 73–99.
50. Mazman, S.G., & Usluel, Y.K. (2010). Modeling educational uses of Facebook. Computers in Education, 55(2), 444–453.
51. Miller, R., & Melton, J. (2015). College students and risk-taking behaviour on Twitter versus Facebook. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34(7), 678–684.
52. Mirabolghasemi, M., Iahad, N. A., & Rahim, N. Z. A. (2016). Students’ perception towards the potential and barriers of social network sites in higher education. In Social networking and education (pp. 41-49). Springer, Cham.
53. Neier, S., & Zayer, L. T. (2015). Students’ perceptions and experiences of social media in higher education. Journal of Marketing Education, 37(3), 133-143.
54. Park, C.H., & Kim, Y.J. (2013). Intensity of social network use by involvement: A study of young Chinese users. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(6), 22–33.
55. Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students' social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 227–238.
56. Pew Reseach Center (2019). Social media fact sheet. Retrieved from http:// https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/
57. Piwek, L., & Joinson, A. (2016). “What do they snapchat about?” Patterns of use in time-limited instant messaging service. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 358–367.
58. Prescott, J., Wilson, S., & Becket, G. (2013). Facebook use in the learning environment: do students want this? Learning, Media and Technology 38(3), 345-350.
59. Raacke, J., & Bonds-Raacke, J. (2008). MySpace and Facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(2), 169–174
60. Recepoğlu, E., & Ergün, M. (2013). Analyzing Perceptions of Prospective Teachers about Their Media Literacy Competencies. Education, 134(1), 62–73.
61. Selwyn, N. (2009). Faceworking: exploring students' education‐related use of Facebook. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 157–174.
62. Sendurur, P., Sendurur, E., & Yilmaz, R. (2015). Examination of the social network sites usage patterns of pre-service teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 188–194.
63. Soomro, K. A., Kale, U., & Zai, Y. S. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ and teacher-educators’ experiences and attitudes toward using social networking sites for collaborative learning. Educational Media International, 51(4), 278–294.
64. Şahin, C. (2017). The predictive level of social media addiction for life satisfaction: a study on university students. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 16(4), 120–125.
65. Teherani A, Martimianakis T, Stenfors-Hayes T, Wadhwa A, & Varpio L. (2015). Choosing a qualitative research approach. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 7(4), 669–70.
66. Turvey, K. (2012). Questioning the character and significance of convergence between social network and professional practices in teacher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), 739–753.
67. Vidal, C. E., Martínez, J. G., Fortuño, M. L., & Cervera, M. G. (2011). University students’attitudes towards and expectations of the educational use of social networks. RUSC. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, 8(1).
68. Vogel, E. A., Rose, J. P., Roberts, L. R., & Eckles, K. (2014). Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 3(4), 206.
69. Yaman, M., & Yaman, Ç. (2014). The Use of Social Network Sites by Prospective Physical Education and Sports Teachers (Gazi University Sample). Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 13(1), 223–231.
70. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin yayıncılık.