A Comparative Study About Teaching Pedagogical Courses - A Sample of England, USA and Turkey

Öz

Pedagogic courses of teaching in USA, England and Turkey was aimed to analyze comparatively in the study. So, the pedagogic courses of the universities presenting each one of the countries which are selected according to the university success rankings were analyzed. The study is a comparative educa-tion research which is one of the types of qualitative research. Document analysis were used in the study as data collection and analysis method. The reports and written documents about the courses and the contexts of them were used as data collection instrument in document analysis. The compared co-untries were analyzed in terms of educational aims, the contexts of the courses, their practice forms and credits in the study. According to the results of the study, while turkey have some similarities with USA in terms of the contexts of the courses, it is seen to be parallel with England in terms of educational aims. Another result shows that the compulsory and selective courses in three countries have differenti-ated in terms of their practice forms besides their similarities.  

Anahtar Kelimeler

• comparative education
• pedagogical courses
• teacher education

Kaynakça

1. Abazaoğlu, İ. (2014). Dünyada öğretmen yetiştirme programları ve öğretmenlere yönelik mesleki gelişim uygulamaları. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Tur-kic, 9(5), 1-46. https://app.trdizin.gov.tr/makale/TWpjNU56azRPQT09/dunyada-ogretmen-yetistirme-programlari-ve-ogretmenlere-yonelik-mesleki-gelisim-uygulamalari
2. Altbach, P. G. (1999). Patterns in higher education development. In American higher education in the twenty-first century (p.15-37), P. G. Altbach, R.O. Berdahl & P. J. Gumport (Ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
3. Daniel, M. F., & Auriac, E. (2009). Philosophy, critical thinking and philosophy for children. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(5), 415-435. DOI:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2008.00483.x
4. Darling – Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Educa-tion, 57 (3), 300-314. DOI:10.1177/0022487105285962
5. Delibaş, H., & Babadoğan, C. (2009). A comparison of biology teacher education programs in Germany, England and Turkey. Elementary Education Online, 8(2), 556-566. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ilkonline/issue/8598/107036
6. Erdem, A. R. (2012). Küreselleşme: Türk yükseköğretimine etkisi.Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 2(2), 109-117. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/yuksekogretim/issue/41250/498258
7. Eurydice. (2011). Türk eğitim sisteminin örgütlenmesi. http://sgb.meb.gov.tr/eurydice/kitaplar/Turk_Egitim_sistemi_2011/Turk_Egitim_Sisteminin_Orgutlenmesi_2011.pdf
8. Evans, J. C., Yip, H., Chan, K., Armatas, C., & Tse, A. (2020). Blended learning in higher education: Professional development in a Hong Kong university. Higher Education Research and Develop-ment, 39(4). 643-656. DOI:10.1080/07294360.2019.1685943

9. Knight, S. L., Lloyd, G. M., Arbaugh, F., Edmondson, J., McDonald, S. P., Nolan, J., & Whitney, A. E. (2013). Teacher learning and standards based instruction. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(3), 200-201. https://pennstate.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/teacher-learning-and-standards-based-instruction
10. Lee, M. N. N., & Healy, S. (2006). Higher education in South-East Asia: An overview. In Higher education in souteast asia, 1-13. UNESCO. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED494258.pdf
11. Mulnix, J. W. (2012). Thinking critically about critical thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(5), 464-479. DOI:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00673.x.
12. Seferoğlu, S. S. (2004).Öğretmen yeterlilikleri ve mesleki gelişim. Bilim ve Aklın Aydınlığında Eğitim, 58, 40-45. http://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~Sadi/yayin/Seferoglu_Ogretmen_Yeterlikleri_BAAE_2004-58.pdf
13. Türkoğlu, A., (1998).Karşılaştırmalı Eğitim Dünya Ülkelerinden Örnekler. Baki Kitabevi.
14. Visakorpi, J., Stankovic, F., Pedrosa, J., & Rozsnyai, C. (2007). Türkiye’de yükseköğretim: Eğilimler, sorunlar ve fırsatlar. TÜSİAD araştırma raporu (yayın No. TÜSİAD-T/2008-10/473). https://tusiad.org/tr/
15. Vithanapathirana, M. (2021). Blended learning as an emerging approach to teachers education in hig-her education in Sri Lanka: Lessons from a State-of-the-Art-Review. University of Colombo Re-view, 2(1),61-79. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354002122_Blended_Learning_as_an_Emerging_Approach_to_Teacher_Education_in_Higher_Education_in_Sri_Lanka_Lessons_from_a_State-of-the-Art_Review
16. YÖK, (2007). Eğitim fakültesi öğretmen yetiştirme programları. https://www.yok.gov.tr/documents
17. YÖK, (2010). Yükseköğretimde yeniden yapılanma: 66 soruda Bologna süreci uygulamaları. Ankara: Yüksek Öğretim Kurulu Başkanlığı.