The Adaptation of Integrated Spiritual Intelligence Scale into Turkish

Öz

The aim of this research is to adapt the Spiritual Intelligence Scale (Amram, Yosi & Dryer, D. Cristopher, 2008) into Turkish and analyze the reliability and validation of the scale. In order to adapt the scale, necessary permission was taken by the scale’s authors. The study translated by 6 people who are graduated from the English teaching department from different universities. The scale reviewed by 2 academicians who are expert in the educational sciences and psychological counseling. The scale involves 83 items with long form and 45 items with short form and it has 22 subscales. Research was conducted on 379 students who were studying at Sakarya University. The psychometric properties of the scale were investigated by confirmatory factor analysis. According to these results, it can be said that the spiritual intelligence scale is reliable and valid in the area of psychology, education and the other social sciences. Confirmatory factor analysis was applied in order to verify construct validity of Integrated Spiritual Intelligence Scale.  The results of the confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated model had an acceptable fit (x²= 724.94, sd= 199, RMSEA= .084, CFI= .94, IFI= .94, NFI= .92). According to this results Turkish version of the Integrated Spiritual Intelligence Scale is a valid and reliable instrument.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Spirituality,spiritual intelligence,scale,reliability and validity

Kaynakça

1. Buzan, T. (2012). The Power of Spiritual Intelligence. https://www.academia.edu/10184891/The_power_of_spiritual_intelligence cited in 9 Nisan 2016.
2. Gardner, H. (1983). Zihin Çerçeveleri: Çoklu Zekâ Kuramı. Çev. Ebru Kılıç. Meta Yayınları 2010. 2. Baskı. Cağaloğlu/İstanbul.
3. Amram, Y. & Dryer, D.C. (2008). The Integrated Spiritual Intelligence Scale (ISIS):Development and Preliminary Validation. Boston: American Psychological Association.
4. Basır, N. (2014). Ruhsal Zeka ve Çevre Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
5. Bowell, A.B. (2004). 7 Adımda Ruhsal Zekâ. Çev. Merve Gün & Yücel Aşıkoğlu. (2007). Hayat Yayınları. Beyoğlu/İstanbul.
6. Gardner, H. (1983). Zihin Çerçeveleri: Çoklu Zekâ Kuramı. Çev. Ebru Kılıç. Meta Yayınları 2010. 2. Baskı. Cağaloğlu/İstanbul.
7. Goleman, D. (1995). Duygusal Zeka neden IQ’dan önemlidir? (Banu Seçkin Yüksel, Çev.). İstanbul: Varlık Yayınları. (40. Basım. 2015).
8. King, D.B. (2008). Rethinking Claims of Spiritual Intelligence: A Definition, Model and Measure (Manevi Zeka İddialarını Yeniden Düşünme). Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Trent Üniversitesi, Ontario, Kanada.

9. İsfâhani, R. (t.y.). Müfredât: Kur’an Kavramları Sözlüğü. Çev. Abdulbaki Güneş, Mehmet Yolcu. Yarın Yayınları 2015. 4. Baskı. İstanbul.
10. Merter, M. (2012). Dokuz Yüz Katlı İnsan: Tasavvuf ve Benötesi Psikolojisi (Transpersonal Psikoloji). (10. bs.). İstanbul: Kaknüs Yayınları.
11. Merter, M. (2014). Psikolojinin Üçüncü Boyutu: Nefs Psikolojisi ve Rüyaların Dili (1. bs). İstanbul: Kaknüs Yayınları.
12. Nazam, F. (2014). Gender Difference on Spiritual Intelligence Among Adolescents (Ergenlerin Manevi Zekasında Cinsiyet Farklılığı). Indian Journal of Applied Research. Volume:4 Issue:11 Kasım 2014 s.423.
13. Vaughan, F. (2002). What is Spiritual Intelligence? Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Vol 42, No. 2. s. 16-33  2003 Sage Publications.
14. Wigglesworth, C. (2004). Integral Theory and its relationship to Spiritual Intelligence and the SQi Assessment (Bütünsel Zekanın Manevi Zeka SQi Ölçeğiyle İlişkisi). www.deepchange.com adresinden 03/04/2016 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
15. Wigglesworth, C. (2012). SQ: Spiritüel Zeka. (Seda Toksoy, Çev.). İstanbul: Kuraldışı Yayıncılık. (2013).
16. Zohar, D. & Marshall, I. (2000). SQ: Ruhsal Zekâmızla Bağlantı Kurmak. Çev. Burak Erdemli & Kemal Budak. İstanbul: Meta Basım Yayınları, Şubat. 2004.
17. Zohar, D. (Ağustos 2010). Spirituality in Higher Education (Yüksek Eğitimde Maneviyat). Volume 5. Issue 5. s. 4.