Development of the Prescriptive Beliefs Regarding Divorce Scale: Validity and Reliability Study

Öz

In this article, it was aimed to introduce the Prescriptive Beliefs Regarding Divorce Scale. It is observed that divorce rate has increased in recent years in Turkey, so it is required to work on post-divorce adjustment . Prescriptive beliefs regarding divorce is an important and significiant predictor of post-divorce adjustment. There is a gap in instruments assessing prescriptive beliefs regarding divorce. The validity and reliability studies of the scale were conducted on data obtained from 315 divorced individuals. The validity of the scale were examined by exploratory factor analysis. The reliability of the scale was tested with Cronbach-alpha coefficient and split-half method. According to the psychometric characteristics of the Prescriptive Beliefs Regarding Divorce Scale, it is concluded that Prescriptive Beliefs Regarding Divorce Scale is a valid and reliable instrument to assess prescriptive beliefs of divorced individuals. Recommendations related to the use of the Prescriptive Beliefs Regarding Divorce Scale were presented.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• DIVORCE
• POST DIVORCE ADJUSTMENT
• BELIEFS
• SCALE

Kaynakça

1. Akıntürk, T. (2002). Türk medeni hukuku aile hukuku. Beta Yayınevi.
2. Amato, P.R. (2000). The concequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 2, 1269-1287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01269.x
3. Booth, A., & Amato, P. (1991). Divorce and psychological stres. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 32, 396-407. DOI: 10.2307/2137106
4. Boss, P. (1992). Primacy of perception in family stress theory and measurement. Journal of Family Psychology, 6(2), 113-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1008
5. Çamkuşu-Arifoğlu, B. (2006). "Çocuklar için boşanmaya uyum programı"nın çocukların boşanmaya uyum, kaygı ve depresyon düzeylerine etkisi (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
6. Gray, J. D., & Silver, R., C. (1990). Opposite sides of the same coin: former spouse’s divergent perspectives in coping with their divorce. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1180-1191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1180
7. Grych, J. H., & Finchman, F.D. (1992). Marital dissolution and family adjustment: An attributional analysis. In Teri L. Orbuch(Ed). Close relationship loss theoretical approaches Springer-Verlag: USA.
8. Kaya, T. (2009). İstanbul’da yaşayan boşanmış kadın ve erkeklerin boşanma deneyimleri (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Yeditepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.

9. Keskin, I. (2007). Boşanmanın sosyolojik ve psikolojik nedenleri ve boşanmanın ortaya çıkardığı sonuçlar (Niğde ili örneği) (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Niğde Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Niğde.
10. Kitson, C. G. (1982). Attachment to the spouse in divorce: A scale and its application. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 379-393. https://doi.org/10.2307/351547
11. Lavee, Y., McCubbin, H. I., & Patterson, J. M. (1985). The double ABCX model of family stress and adaptation: an emprical test by analysis of structural equations with latent variables. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47(4), 811-825. https://doi.org/10.2307/352326
12. McCubbin, H. I. (1979). Integrating coping behaviour in family stres theory. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41(2), 237-244.
13. McCubbin, H. I., Joy, C. B., Cauble, A. E., Comeau, J. K., Patterson, J. M., & Needle, R. H. (1980). Family stress and coping: A decade review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42(4), 855-871. DOI: 10.2307/351829
14. McCubbin, H. I., & Patterson, J. M. (1983). Family stres and adaptation to crises : A double ABCX model to family behavior. Family Studies Review Yearbook. (pp. 87-106) Sage Publications Inc.
15. Munoz-Eguileta, A. (2007). Irrational beliefs as predictors of emotional adjustment after divorce. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 25(1), 1-15. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10942-006-0031-4
16. Özgüven, İ. E. (2000). Evlilik ve aile terapisi. PDREM Yayınları.
17. Öztan, (2004). Aile hukuku. Turhan Kitapevi.
18. Qygard, L., & Hardeng, S. (2001). Divorce support groups: How do group characteristics influence adjustment to divorce. Social Work with Groups, 24(1), 69-87. https://doi.org/10.1300/J009v24n01_06
19. Patterson, J. M. (2002). Integrating family resilience and family stress theory. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(2), 349-360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00349.x
20. Pledge, D. S. (1992). Marital separation/divorce: A review of individual responses to a major life stressor. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 17(3/4), 151-181. https://doi.org/10.1300/J087v17n03_10
21. Plummer, L. P., & Koch-Hattem, A. (1986). Family stres and adjustment to divorce. Family Relations, 35, 523-529. DOI: 10.2307/584513
22. Simon, R. W., & Marcussen, K. (1999). Marital transitions, marital beliefs and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 40, 111-125. DOI: 10.2307/2676367
23. Uçan, Ö., Yazar, H., & Sayıl, I. (2005). Bir boşanma olgusunun dört kurama bağlı olarak değerlendirilmesi. Kriz Dergisi, 14(2), 23-29. https://doi.org/10.1501/Kriz_0000000249
24. Wang, H., & Amato, P. R. (2000). Predictors of divorce adjustment: Stressors, resources and definitions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 655-668. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00655.x
25. Yılmaz, A.E. (2002). The prediction of divorced parents’ emotional / social adjustment and psychological distress from perceived power / control over child related concerns, perceived social support and demographic characteristics (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü , Ankara.