Comparison of dietary phytochemical intake in adults using different assessment methods
Abstract
This study aims to systematically compare the amount of dietary phytochemicals in adults aged 20-65 years using different calculation methods and dietary assessment tools. Data were collected from a total of 430 individuals using a 24-hour dietary recall and food frequency questionnaire; phytochemical intake was calculated using the USDA, Phenol-Explorer, and Phytochemical Index methods. The findings showed significant and statistically significant differences between the methods and assessment tools (p<0.001). The PE method systematically produced higher estimates, while the FI method produced lower estimates, and a very high method × tool interaction was detected. These results highlight the crucial role of methodological choice in estimating phytochemical intake and emphasize that the lack of standardization in inter-study comparisons is a significant limitation. The use of multiple methods and ensuring methodological consistency are critical for future research.
Keywords
Ethical Statement
References
- Ahmad, J. & Ahamad, J. (2020). Bioactive phytochemicals: Drug discovery to product development. Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.2174/97898114644851200101
- Ajabnoor, S.M., Jambi, H. & Bahijri, S. (2024). Development and validation of a food frequency questionnaire in adult Saudi subjects in Jeddah city. BMC Public Health, 24, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17511-9
- Alemayohu, M.A., Zanolin, M.E., Cazzoletti, L., Chamitava, L., de Castro Mendes, F., Mattioli, V. & Garcia-Larsen, V. (2024). Flavonoid content of selected foods – A comparison of four international composition tables. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 134, 106539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2024.106539
- Amiot, M.-J., Latgé, C., Plumey, L. & Raynal, S. (2021). Intake estimation of phytochemicals in a French well-balanced diet. Nutrients, 13(10), 3628. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13103628
- BEBİS (Beslenme Bilgi Sistemi) (2011). Türkçe Sürüm 8. Stuttgart, Almanya: Ebispro. for Windows, Stuttgart, Germany; Turkish version (BeBiS 8), Version 8; databases: Bundeslebensmittelschlüssel (BLS) 11.3 and other sources. Available at: www.bebis.com.tr (Accessed 25 September 2026).
- Burkholder-Cooley, N., Rajaram, S., Haddad, E., Fraser, G.E. & Jaceldo-Siegl, K. (2016). Comparison of polyphenol intakes according to distinct dietary patterns and food sources in the Adventist Health Study-2 cohort. British Journal of Nutrition, 115(12), 2162–2169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114516001331 Chi, Y., Yue, R., Lv, Y., Li, H., & Liao, W. (2024). The dietary phytochemical index and its relation to polycystic ovary syndrome: a case-control study. Journal of Ovarian Research, 17(1), 228. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-024-01540-y
- Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge. ISBN: 978-0-203-77158-7 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
- Delshad Aghdam, S., Siassi, F., Nasli Esfahani, E., Qorbani, M., Rajab, A., Sajjadpour, Z. & Sotoudeh, G. (2021). Dietary phytochemical index associated with cardiovascular risk factor in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 21(1), 293. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02106-2
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Nutrition and Dietetics (Other)
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Arife Demir
0000-0002-6348-5282
Türkiye
Ayşe Nur Kahve
0000-0001-6960-7204
Türkiye
Ebru Bayrak
*
0000-0001-7279-3255
Türkiye
Early Pub Date
September 29, 2026
Publication Date
October 7, 2026
Submission Date
May 13, 2026
Acceptance Date
June 15, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 12 Number: 4