Being a parent of a gifted child: The Deliberate Indifference Theory

Abstract

This theoretical work aims to explain the psychological states of families with gifted children in the field of gifted education. In gifted education, research has primarily focused on the phenomenon of giftedness and the characteristics of gifted individuals. However, the topic of families with gifted children has been somewhat neglected. Especially at the beginning of the 21st century, theorists like Renzulli and Sternberg have emphasized wisdom, which has made environmental and contextual factors important in gifted education. Dabrowski's Theory of Positive Disintegration fills a significant gap in self-psychology and also draws a map to reach the social capital in Renzulli and Sternberg, especially in relation to the overexcitability condition, which is common in gifted individuals. While this is happening, the families of gifted children cannot remain passive. There has been no previous research on the psychological states that families of gifted children go through. The five-stage Grief model proposed for the families of children with autism and intellectual disabilities cannot be applied to the families of gifted children. In this article, I discuss the nine stages that I believe the families of gifted children go through, as mentioned in my previous book. These nine stages are framed as: Surprise, Anxiety About Not Being Able to Meet the Child’s Needs, Facing Reality, The Euphoria of Diagnosis, Seeking Information and Help, Despair and Rebellion, Awareness and Maturity, Relaxation and Automatic Gear, The Desire to Support Others. In these nine stages, the families of gifted children experience changing psychological states due to internal and external factors. Additionally, during the transition from the first to the ninth stage, I noticed that two important psychological constructs work together. These are: Deliberateness (Consciousness) and Indifference. In the first stage, the family of the gifted child exhibits fewer intentional or conscious behaviors regarding the phenomenon, whereas in the final stage, it is at the highest level. Similarly, the "Indifference" state is minimal in the first stage and at its peak in the final stage. In the last stage, the family becomes resolute in a "Deliberate Indifference" state. In this state, the family will make a positive contribution to the gifted child's areas of ability and wisdom development. It is recommended to increase research on the families of gifted children from the perspective of the Deliberate Indifference Theory.

Keywords

• Deliberate Indifference Theory
• parent of gifted
• gifted parent psychology
• Indifference
• Delibareteness

References

1. Ackerman, C. (1997). Identifying gifted adolescents using personality characteristics: Dabrowski’s overexcitabilities. Roeper Review, 19, 229–236.
2. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
3. Dabrowski, K. (1964). Positive disintegration. Boston: Little, Brown.
4. Dabrowski, K. (1967). Personality-shaping through positive disintegration. Boston: Little, Brown.
5. Dabrowski, K. (1970). Mental growth through positive disintegration. London: Gryf.
6. Dabrowski, K. (1972). Psychoneurosis is not an illness. London: Gryf.
7. David, H. (2013). Who is to be treated when there are two gifted siblings who need counseling? Journal of gifted education research, 1(1), 1-9.
8. Gagné, F. (1991). Brief presentation of Gagné and Nadeau‘s attitude scale: Opinions about the gifted and their education. Montreal: University of Québec.

9. Gagné, F. (2018). Attitudes toward gifted education: Retrospective and prospective update. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 60 (4), 403-428. http://www.psychologie-aktuell.com/index.php?id=204
10. Horn, John L.; Cattell, Raymond B. (1967). "Age differences in fluid and crystallized intelligence". Acta Psychologica. 26 (2): 107–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(67)90011-X
11. Kübler-Ross, E. (2009). On Death and Dying: What the Dying Have to Teach Doctors, Nurses, Clergy and Their Own Families. Routledge.
12. Nixon, L. (1983). Meditation as a means of actualizing the religious personality ideal: A review of empirical research from the perspective of Kazimierz Dąbrowski's TPD. Unpublished master's thesis, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec.
13. Nixon, L. (1989). Maladjustment and self-actualization in the life of Teresa of Avila. Studies in Religion, 18 :283- 295. https://doi.org/10.1177/000842988901800304
14. Nixon, L. (1995). A Hindu Swami's description of his experience at level V. The Dąbrowski Newsletter, 2 (1).
15. Nixon, L. (2000). A Dąbrowskian analysis of a Japanese Buddhist nun. The Dąbrowski Newsletter, 6 (2).
16. Peebles, J. L., Mendaglio, S., & McCowan, M. (2023). The Experience of Parenting Gifted Children: A Thematic Analysis of Interviews With Parents of Elementary-Age Children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 67(1), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862221120418
17. Renzulli, J. S., Koehler, J. L., & Fogarty, E. A. (2006). Operation houndstooth intervention theory: Social capital in today’s schools. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29(1). 15–24.
18. Siaud-Facchin, J. (2018). Üstün zekalı çocuğa yardım (L'enfant Surdoué; L'aider á grandir, I'aider á réussir) (1st Ed. Trans: Z. Canan Özatalay). Iletişim.
19. Sternberg, R. J. (1998). A balance theory of wisdom. Review of General Psychology, 2(4), 347-365. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.4.347
20. Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Why schools should teach for wisdom: The balance theory of wisdom in educational settings. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 227-236. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3804_1
21. Stoeger, H. (2009). The history of giftedness research. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), International handbook on giftedness (pp. 21-33). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_2
22. Supporting Emotional Needs of the Gifted (SENG) (2024). https://www.sengifted.org/about
23. Tortop, H. (2014a). Üstün Yetenekli Eğitime İlişkin Tutum Ölçeği uyarlama çalışması (Adaptation study of the Attitude Scale towards Gifted Education). Erzincan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(1), 89-106.
24. Tortop, H.S. (2014b). Revising of the validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Attitude Scale towards Gifted Education for teacher. Journal of Gifted Education Research, 2(2),63-71.
25. Tortop, H.S. (2016). Tecrübe Etkileşimi Vasatında Araştırmalarla Zenginleştirilmiş Uygulamalı (TEVAZU) Üstün Yetenekliler Aile Eğitim Programının etkililiğinin araştırılması. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 3(1), 87- 98.
26. Tortop, H.S. (2024). Differentiated ınstruction for gifted: ınstructional strategies, techniques, and curriculum differentiation models. Genç Bilge (Young Wise).
27. Tortop, H.S. and Ilgaz, G. (2021). Deficiencies in identifying twice exceptional students: the case of Turkey. Proceedings of 2nd International Congress on Gifted Youth and Sustainability of Education (ICGYSE), 8-19 December 2021 Istanbul, Turkey.