An investigation of the views of parents of gifted children on the influences of the labeling
Abstract
The identification of gifted individuals and the use of the 'gifted' label for these individuals continues to be a controversial topic in educational literature, both pedagogically and socially. While research on the effects of this label on individuals has been conducted, studies focusing on parents' experiences and perceptions remain limited. This study aims to examine the perceptions of parents of 8-year-old gifted children regarding the labeling process and the impact of this label on their children's social and academic lives. The study was conducted using a phenomenological approach, a qualitative research design. It was carried out in 2025 with 9 parents (6 mothers, 3 fathers; age range: 30-43) whose children had officially been diagnosed as gifted. Data was collected through a semi-structured interview form titled "Parents' Views on the Labeling Effects of Gifted Children" and analyzed thematically. The findings of the study were structured around four main themes and 13 subthemes. First, under the theme of responses to the diagnosis, it was observed that parents had both positive (happiness, pride, excitement) and negative (anxiety, uncertainty, fear of inadequacy) emotional responses to the identification of their children as gifted. Under the theme of the impact of the diagnosis on parents' perceptions and attitudes, it was found that some parents took more conscious steps toward developing their child's potential, accepted the diagnosis, and normalized it; while others did not observe any change in their children and did not inform their child about the diagnosis. Third, under the theme of the effect of labeling on the social relationships of gifted children, most parents reported no significant changes in social relationships, while some stated that their children experienced an increase in self-confidence after the diagnosis. Lastly, under the theme of the effect of labeling on academic achievement, it was found that children showed tendencies such as fast learning, dislike for repetition, and development of academic control. Some parents stated that the diagnosis positively contributed to academic success in some cases, while in other cases, the effect was limited. Despite the limitations, such as the small number of participants and focusing only on one age group, the findings provide valuable insights for the development of strategies for talent management in early childhood. Based on the findings of this study, a holistic support model consisting of three stages is proposed for the families of gifted children.
Keywords
References
- Adams-Byers, J., Whiteman, C. S., & Moon, S. M. (2004). Perfectionism and competitive behavior in gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(4), 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620404800402
- Borland, J. H. (2005). Gifted education without gifted children: The case for no conception of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 1-19). Cambridge University Press.
- Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Cross, T. L., & Coleman, L. J. (1993). The social cognition of gifted adolescents: An interpretive perspective. Roeper Review, 16(1), 25-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199309553530
- Cross, J. R., & Cross, T. L. (2022). Handbook for counselors serving students with gifts. Routledge.
- Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press.
- Freeman, J. (2010). Gifted lives: What happens when gifted children grow up. Routledge.
- Ferrándiz, C., Ferrando-Prieto, M., Infantes-Paniagua, Á., Fernández Vidal, M. C., & Pons, R. M. (2024). Pre-service teachers' perceptions of physical, socioemotional, and cognitive traits in gifted students: Unveiling bias. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1472880
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Special Talented Education
Journal Section
Research Article
Early Pub Date
May 13, 2025
Publication Date
June 30, 2025
Submission Date
March 16, 2025
Acceptance Date
May 13, 2025
Published in Issue
Year 2025 Volume: 12 Number: 1
APA
Uygun, D., & Ceylan, S. (2025). An investigation of the views of parents of gifted children on the influences of the labeling. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 12(1), 79-93. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15396014
AMA
1.Uygun D, Ceylan S. An investigation of the views of parents of gifted children on the influences of the labeling. JGEDC. 2025;12(1):79-93. doi:10.5281/zenodo.15396014
Chicago
Uygun, Derya, and Sahil Ceylan. 2025. “An Investigation of the Views of Parents of Gifted Children on the Influences of the Labeling”. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity 12 (1): 79-93. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15396014.
EndNote
Uygun D, Ceylan S (June 1, 2025) An investigation of the views of parents of gifted children on the influences of the labeling. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity 12 1 79–93.
IEEE
[1]D. Uygun and S. Ceylan, “An investigation of the views of parents of gifted children on the influences of the labeling”, JGEDC, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 79–93, June 2025, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15396014.
ISNAD
Uygun, Derya - Ceylan, Sahil. “An Investigation of the Views of Parents of Gifted Children on the Influences of the Labeling”. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity 12/1 (June 1, 2025): 79-93. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15396014.
JAMA
1.Uygun D, Ceylan S. An investigation of the views of parents of gifted children on the influences of the labeling. JGEDC. 2025;12:79–93.
MLA
Uygun, Derya, and Sahil Ceylan. “An Investigation of the Views of Parents of Gifted Children on the Influences of the Labeling”. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, vol. 12, no. 1, June 2025, pp. 79-93, doi:10.5281/zenodo.15396014.
Vancouver
1.Derya Uygun, Sahil Ceylan. An investigation of the views of parents of gifted children on the influences of the labeling. JGEDC. 2025 Jun. 1;12(1):79-93. doi:10.5281/zenodo.15396014