EN
Comparison of Quality of Life of Dialysis Treatments: The Case of Ankara Province
Öz
Objective: In this cross-sectional study, the quality of life of the patients who received Central hemodialysis (CH), Home Hemodialysis (HH) and Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) treatments, which are the RRT methods applied in ESRD in Türkiye, compared. This study aimed to offer suggestions for disseminating the application of the treatment method that provides life comfort. Materials and Methods: Kidney Disease Quality of Life scale KDQOL 36 was applied to patients in Ankara diagnosed with ESRD and receiving central hemodialysis, home hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis treatment. The scale was applied by face-to-face interview method between 10.02.2022 and 01.05.2022. A simple random sampling method was used to determine the sample size, and all patients (n:574) with the sample size selected within the scope of the study were reached. In the evaluation of statistical tests, the level of significance was taken as α 0,05. Results: It was observed that the mean quality of life of the physical and mental health components, which indicate the general quality of life of the patients, were below the average level with the values of 37.7±9.8 and 42.4±9.3, respectively. The mean of the effects of kidney disease sub-dimension was 58.9±24.5; The mean of the symptom list sub-dimension of kidney disease was 66.0±21.9. Conclusion: When the mean values of the sub-dimensions of the scale are evaluated as a whole, it is considered that the quality of life of the patients receiving dialysis treatment is low. Since home hemodialysis is superior to other types of dialysis in all sub-dimension mean scores of the scale, it is recommended that the Social Security Institution make encouraging regulations in the Health Implementation Communiqué to disseminate this practice.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Acar, C. (2016). The Effect of Amount of Food Consumption on Blood Pressure During Hemodialysis Application in Chronic Kidney Failure Patients, Master Thesis, Acıbadem University Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Internal Diseases Nursing, Istanbul.
- Blake, C., Codd, M. B, Cassidy A, & O'meara Y. M (2000). Physical function, employment and quality of life in end-stage renal disease. Journal of nephrology, 13(2), 142–149.
- Chen, J. Y, Wan, E., Choi, E., Chan, A., Chan, K., Tsang, J, & Lam, C (2017). The Health-Related Quality of Life of Chinese Patients on Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis. The patient, 10(6), 799–808.
- Edisan, Z., Kadıoğlu, F.G. (2011). Health-Related Quality of Life Scales: An Ethical Evaluation. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Ethics 2011;19(1):8-15
- Kantarcı, F. (2017). Evaluation of Quality of Life in Hemodialysis and Renal Transplantation Patients and Related Factors, Specialization Thesis, Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul.
- Fukuhara, S., Lopes, A. A., Bragg-Gresham, J. L., Kurokawa, K., Mapes, D. L., Akizawa, T., ... & Held, P. J. (2003). Health-related quality of life among dialysis patients on three continents: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. Kidney international, 64(5), 1903-1910.
- Korevaar, J. C., Merkus, M. P., Jansen, M. A., Dekker, F. W., Boeschoten, E. W., & Krediet, R. T. (2002). Validation of the KDQOL-SF TM: A dialysis-targeted health measure. Quality of Life Research, 11, 437-447. Kring, D. L., & Crane, P. B. (2009). Factors affecting quality of life in persons on hemodialysis. Nephrology nursing journal, 36(1).
- Lopes, G. B., Martins, M. T. S., Matos, C. M., Amorim, J. L. D., Leite, E. B., Miranda, E. A., & Lopes, A. A. (2007). Comparações de medidas de qualidade de vida entre mulheres e homens em hemodiálise. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, 53, 506-509.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Sağlık Politikası
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yayımlanma Tarihi
30 Haziran 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi
31 Mart 2023
Kabul Tarihi
11 Mayıs 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2023 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1
APA
Bankur, M., & Ağırbaş, İ. (2023). Comparison of Quality of Life of Dialysis Treatments: The Case of Ankara Province. Journal of Health Systems and Policies, 5(1), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.52675/jhesp.1273876
AMA
1.Bankur M, Ağırbaş İ. Comparison of Quality of Life of Dialysis Treatments: The Case of Ankara Province. JHESP. 2023;5(1):41-51. doi:10.52675/jhesp.1273876
Chicago
Bankur, Mutlu, ve İsmail Ağırbaş. 2023. “Comparison of Quality of Life of Dialysis Treatments: The Case of Ankara Province”. Journal of Health Systems and Policies 5 (1): 41-51. https://doi.org/10.52675/jhesp.1273876.
EndNote
Bankur M, Ağırbaş İ (01 Haziran 2023) Comparison of Quality of Life of Dialysis Treatments: The Case of Ankara Province. Journal of Health Systems and Policies 5 1 41–51.
IEEE
[1]M. Bankur ve İ. Ağırbaş, “Comparison of Quality of Life of Dialysis Treatments: The Case of Ankara Province”, JHESP, c. 5, sy 1, ss. 41–51, Haz. 2023, doi: 10.52675/jhesp.1273876.
ISNAD
Bankur, Mutlu - Ağırbaş, İsmail. “Comparison of Quality of Life of Dialysis Treatments: The Case of Ankara Province”. Journal of Health Systems and Policies 5/1 (01 Haziran 2023): 41-51. https://doi.org/10.52675/jhesp.1273876.
JAMA
1.Bankur M, Ağırbaş İ. Comparison of Quality of Life of Dialysis Treatments: The Case of Ankara Province. JHESP. 2023;5:41–51.
MLA
Bankur, Mutlu, ve İsmail Ağırbaş. “Comparison of Quality of Life of Dialysis Treatments: The Case of Ankara Province”. Journal of Health Systems and Policies, c. 5, sy 1, Haziran 2023, ss. 41-51, doi:10.52675/jhesp.1273876.
Vancouver
1.Mutlu Bankur, İsmail Ağırbaş. Comparison of Quality of Life of Dialysis Treatments: The Case of Ankara Province. JHESP. 01 Haziran 2023;5(1):41-5. doi:10.52675/jhesp.1273876
