Derleme
PDF Zotero Mendeley EndNote BibTex Kaynak Göster

Telerehabilitasyonda Etik Gereklilikler ve İlkeler

Yıl 2019, Cilt 3, Sayı 2, 35 - 37, 09.03.2020
https://doi.org/10.35333/JOHSE.2020.130

Öz

Teknolojik gelişmelerin artmasıyla birlikte sağlık hizmetlerinde teknolojik uygulamaların kullanımı artmıştır. Rehabilitasyon kapsamında hizmetlerinde kullanılan teknolojik uygulamaların başında telerehabilitasyon gelmektedir. Telerehabilitasyon uygulamalarının etik prensipler çerçevesinde uygulanması hasta mahremiyetinin korunması adına büyük önem taşımaktadır. Telerehabilitasyon etiği hususunda uluslararası standartlardaki eksiklik ve uygulanabilecek yasal hükümlerin bulunmaması, pratikte bu uygulamaların kullanımının ve etkili bir şekilde yaygınlaşmasının önündeki en büyük engellerden biridir. Maliyet, zaman ve kullanım kolaylığı sağlayan bu uygulamaların kullanımının olumsuz sonuçlar ortaya koymasını önlemek adına etik prensiplerin net bir şekilde ortaya koyulması ve yasalarla birlikte ele alınması gereklidir. Bu derlemede telerehabilitasyon uygulamalarında dikkate alınması gereken etik prensipler ele alınmış ve olası kural ihlallerinin nasıl sonuçlar doğurabileceği incelenmiştir.

Kaynakça

  • 1. R. Eveleth. The Surgeon Who Operates From 400 km Away. Web Page [Date of access: 6 November 2019]
  • 2. Holt B, Faraklas I, Theurer L, Cochran A, Saffle JR. Telemedicine use among burn centers in the United States: a survey. Journal of burn care & research. 2012;33(1):157-62.
  • 3. Wilson LS, Maeder AJ. Recent directions in telemedicine: review of trends in research and practice. Healthcare informatics research. 2015;21(4):213-22.
  • 4. Moffatt JJ, Eley DS. The reported benefits of telehealth for rural Australians. Australian Health Review. 2010;34(3):276-81.
  • 5. Majerowicz A, Tracy S. Telemedicine: Bridging gaps in healthcare delivery. Journal of AHIMA. 2010;81(5):52-3.
  • 6. Brennan D, Tindall L, Theodoros D, Brown J, Campbell M, Christiana D, Smith D, Cason J, Lee. A blueprint for telerehabilitation guidelines. International journal of telerehabilitation. 2010;2(2):31.
  • 7. Cohn ER. Tele-ethics in telepractice for communication disorders. Perspectives on Telepractice. 2012;2(1):3-15.
  • 8. Clifford GD, Blaya JA, Hall-Clifford R, Fraser HSF. Medical information systems: A foundation for healthcare technologies in developing countries. BioMed Central. 2008; 7(18):1-8.
  • 9. Busis NA. How can I choose the best electronic health record system for my practice? Neurology. 2010;75(18 Supplement 1):60-4.
  • 10. Hammond KW, Helbig ST, Benson CC, Brathwaite-Sketoe BM. Are elec – tronic records trustworthy? Observations on copying, pasting and dupli – cation. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003;269-73.
  • 11. Menachemi N, Collum TH. Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems. Risk management and healthcare policy. 2011;4:47.
  • 12. Bernat JL. Ethical and quality pitfalls in electronic health records. Neurology. 2013;80(11):1057-61.
  • 13. O’Malley AS, Cohen GR, Grossman JM. Electronic medical records and communication with patients and other clinicians: are we talking less? Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2010;(131):1–4.
  • 14. Shachak A, Reis S. The impact of electronic medical records on patient–doctor communication during consultation: a narrative literature review. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice. 2009;15(4):641-9.
  • 15. Balka E, Tolar M. Everyday ethical dilemmas arising with electronic record use in primary care. Studies in health technology and informatics. 2011;169:285-9.
  • 16. Chiuchisan I, Balan DG, Geman O, Chiuchisan I, Gordin I. A security approach for health care information systems. E-Health and Bioengineering Conference, IEEE, 2017; 21-724.
  • 17. George C, Whitehouse D, Duquenoy P. eHealth: legal, ethical and governance challenges. Springer Science & Business Media. 2012.
  • 18. Holmes CM, Reid CA. Ethics in Telerehabilitation: Looking Ahead. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling. 2018;49(2):14-23.
  • 19. Stanberry B. Legal ethical and risk issues in telemedicine. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine. 2001;64(3):225-33.
  • 20. Recupero PR, Rainey SE. Informed consent to e-therapy. American journal of psychotherapy. 2005;59(4):319-31.
  • 21. He D, Naveed M, Gunter CA, Nahrstedt K, editors. Security concerns in Android mHealth apps. American Medical Informatics Association. 2014;645.
  • 22. Carter A, Liddle J, Hall W, Chenery H. Mobile phones in research and treatment: ethical guidelines and future directions. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2015;3(4):e95.

The Ethical Necessities and Principles in Telerehabilitation

Yıl 2019, Cilt 3, Sayı 2, 35 - 37, 09.03.2020
https://doi.org/10.35333/JOHSE.2020.130

Öz

With the increase in technological developments, the use of technological applications in health services has increased. Telerehabilitation is one of the technological applications used in rehabilitation services. The application of telerehabilitation practices within the framework of ethical principles is of great importance for the protection of patient privacy. The lack of international standards on the ethics of telerehabilitation and the lack of applicable legal provisions is one of the major obstacles to the effective use and widespread use of these practices. In order to prevent the use of these practices that provide cost, time and ease of use to produce negative results, ethical principles should be clearly defined and handled with the laws. In this review, ethical principles that should be taken into consideration in telerehabilitation applications are discussed and how possible violations of rules can have consequences.

Kaynakça

  • 1. R. Eveleth. The Surgeon Who Operates From 400 km Away. Web Page [Date of access: 6 November 2019]
  • 2. Holt B, Faraklas I, Theurer L, Cochran A, Saffle JR. Telemedicine use among burn centers in the United States: a survey. Journal of burn care & research. 2012;33(1):157-62.
  • 3. Wilson LS, Maeder AJ. Recent directions in telemedicine: review of trends in research and practice. Healthcare informatics research. 2015;21(4):213-22.
  • 4. Moffatt JJ, Eley DS. The reported benefits of telehealth for rural Australians. Australian Health Review. 2010;34(3):276-81.
  • 5. Majerowicz A, Tracy S. Telemedicine: Bridging gaps in healthcare delivery. Journal of AHIMA. 2010;81(5):52-3.
  • 6. Brennan D, Tindall L, Theodoros D, Brown J, Campbell M, Christiana D, Smith D, Cason J, Lee. A blueprint for telerehabilitation guidelines. International journal of telerehabilitation. 2010;2(2):31.
  • 7. Cohn ER. Tele-ethics in telepractice for communication disorders. Perspectives on Telepractice. 2012;2(1):3-15.
  • 8. Clifford GD, Blaya JA, Hall-Clifford R, Fraser HSF. Medical information systems: A foundation for healthcare technologies in developing countries. BioMed Central. 2008; 7(18):1-8.
  • 9. Busis NA. How can I choose the best electronic health record system for my practice? Neurology. 2010;75(18 Supplement 1):60-4.
  • 10. Hammond KW, Helbig ST, Benson CC, Brathwaite-Sketoe BM. Are elec – tronic records trustworthy? Observations on copying, pasting and dupli – cation. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003;269-73.
  • 11. Menachemi N, Collum TH. Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems. Risk management and healthcare policy. 2011;4:47.
  • 12. Bernat JL. Ethical and quality pitfalls in electronic health records. Neurology. 2013;80(11):1057-61.
  • 13. O’Malley AS, Cohen GR, Grossman JM. Electronic medical records and communication with patients and other clinicians: are we talking less? Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2010;(131):1–4.
  • 14. Shachak A, Reis S. The impact of electronic medical records on patient–doctor communication during consultation: a narrative literature review. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice. 2009;15(4):641-9.
  • 15. Balka E, Tolar M. Everyday ethical dilemmas arising with electronic record use in primary care. Studies in health technology and informatics. 2011;169:285-9.
  • 16. Chiuchisan I, Balan DG, Geman O, Chiuchisan I, Gordin I. A security approach for health care information systems. E-Health and Bioengineering Conference, IEEE, 2017; 21-724.
  • 17. George C, Whitehouse D, Duquenoy P. eHealth: legal, ethical and governance challenges. Springer Science & Business Media. 2012.
  • 18. Holmes CM, Reid CA. Ethics in Telerehabilitation: Looking Ahead. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling. 2018;49(2):14-23.
  • 19. Stanberry B. Legal ethical and risk issues in telemedicine. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine. 2001;64(3):225-33.
  • 20. Recupero PR, Rainey SE. Informed consent to e-therapy. American journal of psychotherapy. 2005;59(4):319-31.
  • 21. He D, Naveed M, Gunter CA, Nahrstedt K, editors. Security concerns in Android mHealth apps. American Medical Informatics Association. 2014;645.
  • 22. Carter A, Liddle J, Hall W, Chenery H. Mobile phones in research and treatment: ethical guidelines and future directions. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2015;3(4):e95.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sağlık Bilimleri ve Hizmetleri
Yayınlanma Tarihi Eylül 2019
Bölüm Derleme
Yazarlar

Fatih ÖZDEN (Sorumlu Yazar)
MUĞLA SITKI KOÇMAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ
0000-0001-6593-3758
Türkiye


Yassine LEMBARKİ Bu kişi benim
ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ
0000-0003-1647-4676
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi 9 Mart 2020
Yayınlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019, Cilt 3, Sayı 2

Kaynak Göster

Bibtex @derleme { jhse701013, journal = {Sağlık Hizmetleri ve Eğitimi Dergisi}, issn = {}, eissn = {2636-8285}, address = {shmyo.dergi@marmara.edu.tr}, publisher = {Marmara Üniversitesi}, year = {2020}, volume = {3}, pages = {35 - 37}, doi = {10.35333/JOHSE.2020.130}, title = {The Ethical Necessities and Principles in Telerehabilitation}, key = {cite}, author = {Özden, Fatih and Lembarki, Yassine} }
APA Özden, F. & Lembarki, Y. (2020). The Ethical Necessities and Principles in Telerehabilitation . Sağlık Hizmetleri ve Eğitimi Dergisi , 3 (2) , 35-37 . DOI: 10.35333/JOHSE.2020.130
MLA Özden, F. , Lembarki, Y. "The Ethical Necessities and Principles in Telerehabilitation" . Sağlık Hizmetleri ve Eğitimi Dergisi 3 (2020 ): 35-37 <https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhse/issue/52989/701013>
Chicago Özden, F. , Lembarki, Y. "The Ethical Necessities and Principles in Telerehabilitation". Sağlık Hizmetleri ve Eğitimi Dergisi 3 (2020 ): 35-37
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - The Ethical Necessities and Principles in Telerehabilitation AU - Fatih Özden , Yassine Lembarki Y1 - 2020 PY - 2020 N1 - doi: 10.35333/JOHSE.2020.130 DO - 10.35333/JOHSE.2020.130 T2 - Sağlık Hizmetleri ve Eğitimi Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 35 EP - 37 VL - 3 IS - 2 SN - -2636-8285 M3 - doi: 10.35333/JOHSE.2020.130 UR - https://doi.org/10.35333/JOHSE.2020.130 Y2 - 2020 ER -
EndNote %0 Sağlık Hizmetleri ve Eğitimi Dergisi The Ethical Necessities and Principles in Telerehabilitation %A Fatih Özden , Yassine Lembarki %T The Ethical Necessities and Principles in Telerehabilitation %D 2020 %J Sağlık Hizmetleri ve Eğitimi Dergisi %P -2636-8285 %V 3 %N 2 %R doi: 10.35333/JOHSE.2020.130 %U 10.35333/JOHSE.2020.130
ISNAD Özden, Fatih , Lembarki, Yassine . "The Ethical Necessities and Principles in Telerehabilitation". Sağlık Hizmetleri ve Eğitimi Dergisi 3 / 2 (Mart 2020): 35-37 . https://doi.org/10.35333/JOHSE.2020.130
AMA Özden F. , Lembarki Y. The Ethical Necessities and Principles in Telerehabilitation. JOHSE. 2020; 3(2): 35-37.
Vancouver Özden F. , Lembarki Y. The Ethical Necessities and Principles in Telerehabilitation. Sağlık Hizmetleri ve Eğitimi Dergisi. 2020; 3(2): 35-37.
IEEE F. Özden ve Y. Lembarki , "The Ethical Necessities and Principles in Telerehabilitation", Sağlık Hizmetleri ve Eğitimi Dergisi, c. 3, sayı. 2, ss. 35-37, Mar. 2020, doi:10.35333/JOHSE.2020.130