Fibrinojen Tayin Yöntemlerinin Karşılaştırılması: Tarihsel Pencereden Bakış (Modifiye Stirland, Clauss Kronometrik ve Sodyum Sülfit ile Fraksiyonizasyon Yöntemlerinin Karşılaştırılması)

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 5 - 12, 29.04.2021

Pınar Eker

https://doi.org/10.29228/JOHSE.8

Öz

Günümüzde otoanalizörlerde kullanılan Clauss kronometrik yönteminin manuel versiyonu, daha eski bir metotla, Modifiye Stirland yöntemi ile karşılaştırılmıştır. Fibrinojenin sodyum sülfit ile presipitasyonu ve ardından fraksiyone edilen fibrinojenin Biüret yöntemi ile protein olarak ölçülmesi referans yöntem olarak kullanılmıştır. Çalışma aynı zamanda otoanalizörler ile rutin laboratuvar çalışmalarına dahil olan uzman ve öğrencilerin fibrinojen testlerinin tarihsel evrimi hakkında fikir oluşturmasına yardımcı olacaktır.
Biüret yöntemine dayalı referans ve Modifiye Stirland yöntemi karşılaştırıldığında, arasında anlamlı fark bulunmuştur (t= -6,075; p<0.05). Referans ve Clauss kronometrik yöntemi arasındaki fark istatistiksel yönden anlamlı bulunmamıştır (t=-1.833; p= 0.076). Modifiye Stirland ve referans yöntemi arasındaki korelasyon yüksek düzeyde anlamlı (r= 0.898; p<0.001); referans ve Clauss kronometrik yöntemi arasındaki korelasyon da yüksek düzeyde anlamlı bulunmuştur. (r= 0.845; p<0.001). Her yöntemin deney içi tekrarlanabilirliği için averaj varyasyonlar hesaplanmıştır. Bu değerler Biüret yöntemine dayalı referans, modifiye Stirland ve Clauss kronometrik yöntemi için sırasıyla % 5.77; %6.78 ve %2.56 dür. Fibrinojen düzeylerinin ölçümünde manuel versiyonu kullanılmış olan Clauss kronometrik yöntemi, Modifiye Stirland yöntemine oranla daha başarılı bulunmuştur. Manuel olarak uygulanan Clauss kronometrik yöntemi günümüzde otoanalizörlerde çalışılan bir metod şeklinde günlük biyokimya laboratuvar tıbbında yerini korumaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Fibrinojen, yöntem karşılaştırma, klinik kimya, analiz

Comparison of Fibrinogen Determination Methods Looking from the Historical Window (Comparison Of Modified Stirland, Clauss Chronometric and Sodium Sulfite Fractionation Methods)

Öz

The manual version of the Clauss chronometric method which is used in autoanalysers today, was compared with the Modified Stirland method, which was older than Clauss chronometric method. Fractionation of fibrinogen which was precipitated with sodium sulfite followed determination as a protein by Biuret method was used as the reference method. The study will also help experts and students involved in routine laboratory work with autoanalysers to provide insight into the historical evolution of fibrinogen testing.
Significant difference was found between the reference method which was based on determination of fibrinogen by Biuret reagent and the Modified Stirland method (t= -6,075; p<0.05). The difference between the Reference and Clauss chronometric method was not statistically significant (t=-1.833; p=0.076). The correlation between the modified Stirland and the reference method is highly significant (r= 0.898; p<0.001); Correlation between reference and Clauss chronometric method was also found highly significant. (r = 0.845; p <0.001). Average variations were calculated for each method. These values are 5.77%. 6.78% and 2.56%, respectively, for reference, Modified Stirland and Clauss chronometric method; The Clauss chronometric method, which was used in the manual version for measuring fibrinogen levels, was found to be more successful than the Modified Stirland method. Clauss chronometric method, which was applied manually, still maintains its place in daily biochemistry laboratory medicine as in fully automated auto analyzers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Fibrinogen, method comparison, chemistry, clinical chemistry

Kaynakça

• Stirland RM. A rapid method of estimating fibrinogen. Lancet. 1956; May 12;270(6924):672.
• Clauss A. Gerinnunpsphysiolopische schnellmethode zur Bestimmung des Fibrinogens. Acta Haematologica. 1957;17: 237-246.
• Goodwin JF. Estimation of Plasma Fibrinogen, Using Sodium Sulfite Fractionation. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1961;35(3):227-232.
• Zacharski LR, R Rosenstein R. Comparison of the reaction- rate and clot density methods for determination of plasma Fibrinogen. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1977;68(1):45-52.
• Cunningham MT, Olson JD, Chandler WL, Van Cott EM, Eby CS, Teruya J, Hollensead SC, Adcock DM, Allison PM, Kottke-Marchant KK, Smith MD. External quality assurance of fibrinogen assays using normal plasma: results of the 2008 College of American Pathologists proficiency testing program in coagulation. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012 Jul;136(7):789-95.
• Miesbach W, Schenk J, Alesci S, Lindhoff-Last E. Comparison of the fibrinogen Clauss assay and the fibrinogen PT derived method in patients with dysfibrinogenemia. Thromb Res. 2010;126(6):e428–e433.
• Ratnoff OD, Menzie C. A new method for the determination of fibrinogen in small samples of plasma. J. Lab Clin Med.1951;37(2):316-20.
• Reiner M, Cheung HL. A practical method for the determination of fibrinogen. Clinical Chemistry. 1959;5(5):414–420.
• Aras K, Ersen G, Klinik Biyokimya. Syf: 125, 1977.
• Giddins JC. Blood Coagulation and Haemostasis: Hereditary coagulation disorders: laboratory techniques., Editör: Jean M. Thompson, Second Edition. 1980: 117.
• Aras K, Ersen G, Klinik Biyokimya. Syf: 454, 1977.
• Aras K, Ersen G, Klinik Biyokimya. Syf: 175, 1977.
• Jesse F. Goodwin. An Evalution of Tecnics for the separation and Estimation of Plasma Fibrinogen. Clin-Chem, 1965;Jan 11, pages:63-73.
• Goodwin JF. An Evaluation of Turbidimetric Technics for Estimation of Plasma Fibrinogen.Clinical Chemistry 1967;13(12):1057-1064.
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical method for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet. 1986;i:307-310.
• Bland JM, Altman DG .Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 1999;8:135-160.
• Exner T, Burridge J, Power P, Rickard KA. An evaluation of currently available methods for plasma fibrinogen. Am J Clin Pathol. 1979 May;71(5):521-527.
• Zacharski LR, Rosenstein R. Comparison of the reaction rate and clot density methods for determination of plasma fibrinogen. Am. J. Clin. Pathol.1977;68(1):45-52.
• Stevens DJ, Sanfelippo MJ. .Evalution of three methods for plasma fibrinogen determination. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1973;60(2):182-187.
• Filip DJ, Eckstein JD, Sibley CA. Observations on diagnostic kits for the determination of plasma fibrinogen. Am J Clin Pathol. 1974 Jul;62(1):32-9.
• Blood Coagulation and Haemostatis: The Laboratory investigation of Fibrinolysis. Edited by Jean M. Thomson. Second Edition, page: 232 1980.
• Koepke JA, Gilmer PR Jr, Filip DJ, Eckstein JD, Sibley CA. Studies of fibrinogen measurement in the CAP survey program. Am J Clin Pathol. 1975 Jun;63(6 SUPPL):984-989.