Some Aspects of the Etymology, Ontology and Genesis of the Methodologies of Historical Cognition

Öz

The problems of the methodology of historic cognition have always been related to the most difficult and simultaneously the most interesting themes for historians and philosophers. The current period of the historic cognition development has been recognized by scholars as the epoch of crisis, the reason of which is the fallibility in the epistemological foundations of the two doctrines, which until now have determined the theoretical understanding of the historical process - positivism and historical materialism. And in order to overcome the crisis the historians need to make the search of new methodologies and methods of historical cognition  more actively. In this paper the etymology, ontology and genesis of the main methodological approaches in historical cognition are researched on the basis of the analysis of the work of the historians, philosophers, social anthropologists, and others. Relatively to some important methodological problems, the author describes out her own vision and makes the conclusion that the anthropological approach is the latest methodological approach to the cognition of history. It does not go beyond the outlet of the old scientific paradigm, so it can not provide the principle of historicism of exit out of the state of crisis. And she drews attention to the fact Here is caution required that philosophers and historians focus on the problems of time, including historical, whereas paying little attention to the problems of space. In this plane, basing on  interdisciplinism, as the author supposes, there have to appear a new discovery of the world importance, which will change the old paradigm of science in general, and historical in particular. At the same time, the author warns against haste in the matter of changing the world-view principle of anthropocentrism to anthropomorphism, in the way as some modern physicists are appeal to.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• history,philosophy,methodology,paradigm,historicism,positivism,thinking,historical thinking

Kaynakça

1. 1. Barh M. A. Эpoxy y ydey. Stanovlenye ystoryzma / M. A. Barh. M.: Mыsl", 1987. 348 s. 2. Blok M. Apolohyya ystoryy yly Remeslo ystoryka / M. Blok / Per. E. M. Lыsenko. M.: Nauka, 1986. 254 s. 3. Bojchenko I. Filosofiya istoriyi: pidruchnyk / I. Bojchenko. K.: Znannya, 2000. 723 s. 4. Borysova O. V. Geneza naukovoyi paradyhmy istorychnoho procesu v seredni viky (V – XV st.) : monohrafiya / O. V. Borysova. Luhans"k: Al"ma-mater, 2005. 456 s. 5. Borysova O. V. Zemlya v prostori «semy klimativ» u al-Xvarizmi (IX st.) O. V. Borysova // Istorychni zapysky: Zbirnyk naukovyx prac". Vyp.7. Luhans"k: Vydavnyctvo SNU im. V.Dalya, 2005. S. 216 – 222. 6. Borysova O. V. K voprosu o synteze ystoryy y estestvoznanyya v henezyse nauchnoj mыsly (postanovka problemы) / O. V. Borysova // Materialy III Mizhnarodnoyinauk.-metod. konferenciyi «Bezpeka. Zdorov’ya. Reabilitaciya». Vyp. III. Luhans"k: Znannya, 2005. S. 27 – 33. 7. Borysova O.V. Problema istoriosofiyi ta filosofiyi heoprostoru (heosofiyi) v etnohenezi Ukrayiny / O. V. Borysova // Istoriya ukrayins"koyi nauky na mezhi tysyacholit": Zbirnyk naukovyx prac" / Vidp. red. O. Ya. Pylypchuk. Kyyiv, 2005. S. 42 – 48. 8. Borysova O. V. Problemachasu i prostoru u Avreliya Avhustyna j Ibn Tufejlya: spivpadayuchyj aspekt / O. V. Borysova // Istorychni zapysky. Zbirnyk naukovyx prac". – Vyp. 2. Luhans"k: Vydavnyctvo SNU im. V.Dalya, 2004. S. 23 – 29. 9. Borysova O. V. Cej dyvnyj fenomen al-akalimu (Klimata) / O. V. Borysova // Visnyk Luhans"koho nacional"noho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka, 2005. №.14. S. 139 – 146. 10. Brajchevs"kyj S. M. Implikatyvna filosofiya Myxajla Brajchevs"koho / S. M. Brajchevs"kyj // Nacional"nyjuniversytet «Kyyevo-Mohylyans"ka akademiya». Naukovi zapysky, 2002. T. 20. S. 71 – 75. 11. Brodel" F. Materyal"naya cyvylyzacyya, эkonomyka y kapytalyzm. XV – XVIII vv. (V 3-x tt.) / F. Brodel" / Per. s fr. M. E. Kubbelya. M.: Prohress, 1988. – 623 s. 12. Vashkevych N. N. Systemnыe yazыky mozha / N. N. Vashkevych. – 2-e yzd. M.: Belыeal"vы, 2002. 400 s. 13. Vernadskyj V. Y. Nauchnaya mыsl" kak planetarnoe yavlenye / V. Y. Vernadskyj. M.: Nauka, 1991. 271 s. 14. Holovko B. A. Filosofs"ka antropolohiya: Navch. posibnyk / B. A. Holovko. K.: IZMN, 1997. 240 s.. 15. Hrabsky A. F. Fernan Brodel", voprosы metodolohy yystoryy / A. F. Hrabsky // Novaya y novejshaya ystoryya, 1990. № 5. S. 194 – 201. 16. Kedrov B. M. Problemы lohyky y metodolohyy nauky / B. M. Kedrov. M.: Nauka, 1990. 352 s. 17. Kollynhvud R. Dzh. Ydeya ystoryy: Avtobyohrafyya / R. Dzh. Kollynhvud / Per. y komm. Yu.A.Aseeva. M.: Nauka, 1980. 485 s. 18. Konovalova Y. H. Vostochnaya Evropa v sochynenyy al-Ydrysy / Y. H. Konovalova. M.: «Vostochnayaliteratura» RAN., 1999. 254 s. 19. Kononov Y. F. Problema prostranstva v socyolohyy / Y. F. Kononov // Visnyk Xarkivs"koho nacional"noho un-tu im. V. N. Karazina, 2004.№ 621. S. 20 – 26. 20. Krыmskyj S. B. Metaystorycheskye rakursы fylosofyy ystoryy / S. B. Krыmskyj // Voprosыfylosofyy, 2001. № 6. S. 32 – 51. 21. Kudryavceva V. Y. Nachala kosmonomyy / V. Y. Kudryavceva. Mn.: Bestprynt, 2001. 144 s. 22. Kun T. Struktura nauchnыx revolyucyj / T. Kun / Per s anhl. Y.E. Valetova. M.: Prohress, 1975. 287 s. 23. LeHoff, Zhak. Cyvylyzacyya srednevekovoho Zapada / Zh. LeHoff / Per. s. fr., poslesl. A. Ya. Hurevycha. Sretensk: Mezhkonfess. centrystoryko-fylosof. yssledovanyjToledo, 2000. 370 s. 24. Morhun V. A. Hromadyans"ke suspil"stvo v konteksti typolohiyi psyxoistoriyi lyudstva / V. A. Morhun // Nauka. Relihiya. Suspil"stvo. Donec"k, 2003. №1. S. 171 – 212. 25. Morhun V. A. Tradycijni ta suchasni zasady kosmometriyi (u konteksti vidkryttya periodychnoyi systemypul"saciyi Kosmosu – pryrody, suspil"stva, lyudyny) / V. A. Morhun // Yskusstvennыj yntellekt. Doneck, 2003. №4. S. 511 – 569. 26. PavlenkoYu. V. Ystoryya myrovoj cyvylyzacyy. Fylosofskyj analyz / Yu. V. Pavlenko. – 2-e yzd. K.: Fenyks, 2004. 760 s. 27. Palyushev B. Fyzyka Boha 2: Pohranychnыe prostranstva / B. Palyushev. Per. s bolh. Vozdvyzhenskoj T. M.: AST, Astrel, 2003. 318 s. 28. Panaryn A. S. Dvupolusharnaya struktura myra: pereosmыslenye dyxotomyy «Vostok – Zapad» / A. S. Panaryn // Vostok, 1998. № 2. S. 26 – 33. 29. Popper K. R. Nyshheta ystoryzma / K. R. Popper / Per. s anhl. // Fylosofskaya y socyolohycheskaya mыsl", 1990. № 10. S. 63 – 74. 30. Reyent O. P. Kryza suchasnoyi istorychnoyi nauky: [Metodolohichnyj i dzhereloznavchyj aspekt] / O. P. Reyent // IstoriyaUkrayiny. 1999. № 13. S. 1 – 4. 31. Rotenfel"dYu. A. Fylosofyyayly Ten" mudrosty. Al"ternatyvnoe tolkovanye hrechesko jfylosofyy / Yu. A. Rotenfel"d. M.: Yzdatel"skyereshenyya, 2017. 184 s. 32. Tojnbi A. Dzh. Doslidzhennya istoriyi. – TT. I, II / A. Dzh. Tojnbi / Per z anhl. M.: Osnovy, 1995. 613 s.; 400 s. 33. Feofylakt Symokatta. Ystoryya / Symokatta Feofylakt. M.: Yzd-vo AN SSSR, 1957. 222 s. 34. Feller V. Vvedenye v ystorycheskuyu antropolohyyu: Opыt reshenyya lohycheskoj problemыf ylosofyy ystoryy / V. Feller. M.: KNORUS, 2005. 608 s. 35. Chelovek kak kosmycheskyj fenomen: novыe humanytarnыe y estestvennonauchnыe podxodы / Mezhdunarodnыj sb. yssled. rabot. Vыp. IV – V. Yzhevsk: Yzd-voUdmurtskohoun-ta, 1999. 124 s. 36. معجم البلدان لياقوت الحموي الجزء الاول-القاهرة- ١۹٩۰ -٣٩٨ص