ÖRGÜTLER GERÇEKLİĞİ FARKLI YANSITABİLİR Mİ? DİL FAKTÖRÜNÜN GERÇEKLİĞİN İNŞASI VE YANSITILMASINDAKİ ROLÜ ÜZERİNDEN KURUMSALCI BİR AÇIKLAMA

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 1 - 16, 01.06.2018

Salih Arslan , Recai Coşkun

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı örgütlerin, kurumsal çevresine dil aracılığıyla farklı bir gerçeklik görüntüsü yansıtabilme imkânını kurumsal kuram bakış açısıyla açıklayabilmektir. Bu doğrultuda “örgütler dil aracılığı ile gerçekliği farklılaştırarak sunabilir mi ve bu iddia kurumsal kuramla çelişir mi?” temel soruları yöneltilmiştir. Dilin kurumların inşasındaki ve gerçekliklerin yansıtılmasındaki yetenekleri üzerinden cevaplar aranmaya çalışılmıştır. Dil ve kurumların etkileşimsel sürecin doğası gereği birbirlerini yansıtması gerektiği, dilin kurumsal özelliğinin sosyal gerçekliği farklılaştırarak sunabilmesine imkân tanıdığı ve bu iddianın kurumsal kuramla çelişki oluşturmayacağı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kurumsal Kuram, Kurumsallaşma, Örgütsel Dil, Örgütsel Gerçeklik

AN INSTITUTIONAL EVALUATION OVER THE ROLE OF LANGUAGE FACTOR IN THE CONSTRUCTION AND REFLECTION OF ORGANIZATIONAL REALITY

Öz

The purpose of this study is to be able to explain the possibility of reflecting the different reality image through the
language to the institutional environment in terms of institutional theories. In this aim direction, the main questions were
asked "can organizations present differentiated reality through language and that this claim is contradictory to institutional
theory?" The answers have been sought through the ability of the language institutions to build and reflect their reality. The
study was conducted through a theoretical discussion method through literature review. As a result of the study carried out
within the scope of this article, it has been achieved that the language and institutions should reflect each other in the nature
of the interactive process, allow the language's institutional characteristic to present differentiated social reality, and that
this claim can not constitute a contradiction with institutional theory. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Institutional Theory, Institutionalization, Organizational Language, Organizational Reality

Kaynakça

• Ashcraft, K. L., T. R.Kuhn ve F.Cooren. (2009). Constitutional Amendments: Materializing Organizational Communication. Academy of Management Annals, 3.1, 1-64.
• Barley, S. R. ve P. S.Tolbert. (1997). Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links Between Action and Institution. Organization Studies, 18.1, 93-117.
• Berger, P.L. ve T.Luckmann. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Doubleday.
• DiMaggio, P. J. ve W.W.Powell. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
• DiMaggio, P.J. ve W.W. Powell. (1991). Introdiction. W.W.Powell ve P.J.DiMaggio (Ed). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (içinde). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1-38.
• DiMaggio, P. J. (1997). Culture and Cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 263-287.
• Fligstein, N. (1997). Social Skill and Institutional Theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 40.4, 397-405.
• Friedland, R. ve R.R.Alford. (1991). Bringing Society Back in: Symbols, Practies and Institutional Contradictions. W.W.Powell ve P.J.DiMaggio (Ed). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (içinde). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 232-263.
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Inc.
• Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Autline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
• Goffman, E. (1983). The Interaction Order: American Sociological Association, 1982 Presidential Address. American Sociological Review, 48.1, 1-17.
• Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure. The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91.3, 481-510.
• Greenwood, R. ve C.R.Hinings. (1996). Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21.4, 1022-1054.
• Hasselbladh, H. ve J.Kallinikos. (2000). The Project of Rationalization: A Critique and Reappraisal of Neo-Istitutionalism in Organization Studies. Organization Studies, 21.4, 697-720.
• Haveman, H.A. ve H.Rao. (1997). Structuring a Theory Moral Sentiments: Institutional and Organizational Coevolution in the Early Thrift Industry. American Journal of Sociology, 102.6, 1606-1651.
• Hirsch, P.M. (1997). Sociology without Social Structure: Neo-Institutional Theory Meets Brave New World. American Journal of Sociology, 102.6, 1702-1723.
• Hirsch, P.M. ve M.Lounsbury. (1997). Ending the Family Quarrel: Toward a Reconciliation of Old and New İnstitutionalisms. American Behavioral Scientist, 40.4, 406-418.
• Jepperson, R.L. (1991). Institutions, Institutional Effects and Institutionalism. W.W.Powell ve P.J.DiMaggio (Ed). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (içinde). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 143-163.
• Loewenstein, J., W.Ocasio ve C.Jones. (2012). Vocabularies and Vocabulary Structure: A New Approach Linking Categories, Practices and Institutions. Academy of Management Annals, 6.1, 41-86.
• Meyer, J.W. ve B. Rowan. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83.2, 340-363.
• Meyer, J.W. ve B.Rowan. (1991). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. W.W.Powell ve P.J.DiMaggio (Ed). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (içinde). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 41-62.
• Meyer, J.W. ve R.L.Jepperson. (2000). The Actors of Modern Society: The Cultural Construction of Social Agency. Sociological Theory, 18.1, 101-120.
• Meyer, J.W. (2008). Reflections on Institutional Theories of Organizations. R.Greenwood, C.Oliver, K.Sahlin ve R.Suddaby (Ed). Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (içinde). London: Sage. 788-809.
• Phillips, N., T.B.Lawrence ve C.Hardy. (2004). Discourse and Institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29.4, 635-652.
• Powell, W.W. (1991). Expanding the Scope of Institutional Analysis. W.W.Powell ve P.J.DiMaggio (Ed). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (içinde). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 183-203.
• Powell, W.W. ve J.A.Colyvas. (2008). Microfoundations of Institutional Theory. R.Greenwood, C.Oliver, K.Sahlin ve R.Suddaby (Eds). Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (içinde), London: Sage. 276-298.
• Scott, W.R. (1987). The Adolescence of Institutional Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 493-511.
• Scott, W.R. (2008). Approaching Adulthood: The Maturing of Institutional Theory. Theory Sociology. 37, 427-442.
• Sewell, W.H. (1992). A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency and Transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98.1, 1-29.
• Simon, H. (1976). Administrative Behavior. 3th ed. Newyork: The Free Press. Macmillan Publishing.
• Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies. American Sociological Review, 51.2, 273-286.
• Thornton, P.H. ve W.Ocasio. (2008). Institutional Logics. R.Greenwood, C.Oliver, K.Sahlin ve R.Suddaby (Ed). Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (içinde). London: Sage. 99-129.
• Tolbert, P.S. ve L.G. Zucker. (1996). The Institutionalization of Institutional Theory. S.Clegg, C.Hardy ve W.Nord (Ed). Handbook of Organization Studies (içinde). London: Sage. 175-190.
• Weick, K.E. (1993). The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38.4, 628-652.
• Zilber, T.B. (2002). Institutionalization as an Interplay Between Actions, Meanings and Actors: The Case of a Rape Crisis Center in Israel. Academy of Management Journal, 45.1, 234-254.
• Zucker, L.G. (1977). The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence. American Sociological Review, 42.5, 726-743.
• Zucker, L.G. (1987). Institutional Theories of Organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443-464.
• Zucker, L.G. (1991). The Role of İnstitutionalization in Cultural Persistence. W.W.Powell ve P.J.DiMaggio (Ed). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. University of Chicago Press. Chicago. 83-107.