Araştırma Makalesi

Comparative Biomechanical Evaluation of Combined Cement- and Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Restorations with 3D Finite Element Analysis

Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1 26 Ekim 2021
  • Nagehan Baki *
  • Mesut Tuzlalı
  • Erkan Bahçe
  • Esma Başak Gül Aygün
  • Volkan Arısan
  • Mutlu Özcan
PDF İndir
EN TR

Comparative Biomechanical Evaluation of Combined Cement- and Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Restorations with 3D Finite Element Analysis

Öz

Introduction: Implant restorations may need to be removed in case of mechanical and biological complications or renewal of the restorations. For this purpose, the combined cement- and screw-retained implant-supported restorations have gained increasing interest in implant dentistry because they combine the advantages of cemented and screw-retained restorations to a great extent and reduce their disadvantages. The purpose of this study was the comparative biomechanical evaluation of combined cement- and screw-retained implant-supported metal-ceramic, zirconia, and monolithic zirconia restorations using the 3D finite element stress method. Materials and Methods: In the study, 3 jawbone models were prepared. Dense cortical bone (2 mm) and thick trabecular bone type below, which is seen 50% in the posterior region of the mandible, were modeled and the material properties of these bone types were defined. Titanium implants with a diameter of 4 mm and a length of 10 mm were placed on these jaw models. Then, metal-ceramic, zirconia, and monolithic zirconia restorations were modeled on the placed implants. Considering the worst-case scenario, an average occlusion force of 100 N was applied obliquely (30° to the x, y, and z axes) in the distal triangular fossa of the crowns. As a result of the study, the stress distributions and values obtained in the implant components and peri-implant tissues were analyzed and interpreted. Results: It is observed that the stresses occurring in the bone, restoration, implant, and implant components occur below the durability level of the structures. In addition, stress values and distributions in metal-ceramic, zirconia, and monolithic zirconia models were similar. Discussion & Conclusion: Metal-ceramic, zirconia, and monolithic restorations can be used safely in a combined cement and screw-retained implant-supported system.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Destekleyen Kurum

İnönü Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Koordinasyon Birimi

Proje Numarası

TCD-2020-1556

Kaynakça

  1. Journal of Meffert Implant Institute Implant Master Symposium

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Diş Hekimliği

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

26 Ekim 2021

Gönderilme Tarihi

1 Ağustos 2021

Kabul Tarihi

16 Ekim 2021

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2021 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Baki, N., Tuzlalı, M., Bahçe, E., Gül Aygün, E. B., Arısan, V., & Özcan, M. (2021). Comparative Biomechanical Evaluation of Combined Cement- and Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Restorations with 3D Finite Element Analysis. Journal of Meffert Implant Institute, 5(1), 1-3. https://izlik.org/JA82ZR33GK
AMA
1.Baki N, Tuzlalı M, Bahçe E, Gül Aygün EB, Arısan V, Özcan M. Comparative Biomechanical Evaluation of Combined Cement- and Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Restorations with 3D Finite Element Analysis. J Meffert Imp Inst. 2021;5(1):1-3. https://izlik.org/JA82ZR33GK
Chicago
Baki, Nagehan, Mesut Tuzlalı, Erkan Bahçe, Esma Başak Gül Aygün, Volkan Arısan, ve Mutlu Özcan. 2021. “Comparative Biomechanical Evaluation of Combined Cement- and Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Restorations with 3D Finite Element Analysis”. Journal of Meffert Implant Institute 5 (1): 1-3. https://izlik.org/JA82ZR33GK.
EndNote
Baki N, Tuzlalı M, Bahçe E, Gül Aygün EB, Arısan V, Özcan M (01 Ekim 2021) Comparative Biomechanical Evaluation of Combined Cement- and Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Restorations with 3D Finite Element Analysis. Journal of Meffert Implant Institute 5 1 1–3.
IEEE
[1]N. Baki, M. Tuzlalı, E. Bahçe, E. B. Gül Aygün, V. Arısan, ve M. Özcan, “Comparative Biomechanical Evaluation of Combined Cement- and Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Restorations with 3D Finite Element Analysis”, J Meffert Imp Inst, c. 5, sy 1, ss. 1–3, Eki. 2021, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA82ZR33GK
ISNAD
Baki, Nagehan - Tuzlalı, Mesut - Bahçe, Erkan - Gül Aygün, Esma Başak - Arısan, Volkan - Özcan, Mutlu. “Comparative Biomechanical Evaluation of Combined Cement- and Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Restorations with 3D Finite Element Analysis”. Journal of Meffert Implant Institute 5/1 (01 Ekim 2021): 1-3. https://izlik.org/JA82ZR33GK.
JAMA
1.Baki N, Tuzlalı M, Bahçe E, Gül Aygün EB, Arısan V, Özcan M. Comparative Biomechanical Evaluation of Combined Cement- and Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Restorations with 3D Finite Element Analysis. J Meffert Imp Inst. 2021;5:1–3.
MLA
Baki, Nagehan, vd. “Comparative Biomechanical Evaluation of Combined Cement- and Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Restorations with 3D Finite Element Analysis”. Journal of Meffert Implant Institute, c. 5, sy 1, Ekim 2021, ss. 1-3, https://izlik.org/JA82ZR33GK.
Vancouver
1.Nagehan Baki, Mesut Tuzlalı, Erkan Bahçe, Esma Başak Gül Aygün, Volkan Arısan, Mutlu Özcan. Comparative Biomechanical Evaluation of Combined Cement- and Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Restorations with 3D Finite Element Analysis. J Meffert Imp Inst [Internet]. 01 Ekim 2021;5(1):1-3. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA82ZR33GK