Araştırma Makalesi

Mortier et Béton de Sol : Un Etat de la Question

Sayı: 9 31 Aralık 2016
  • Veronique Vassal
PDF İndir
EN TR

Mortier et Béton de Sol : Un Etat de la Question

Öz

After a brief presentation of the various materials used in these pavements and the description of their decorative repertoires, we discuss the question of vocabulary. Indeed, for several years, many problems of terminology divide the scientific community. The study of ancient texts and the different interpretations of the De Architectura of Vitruvius, rather than clarifying the study of this type of pavement lead to make it more confusing. A detailed commentary of the new terminology defined by Italian researchers, shows that it is not easy to standardize the descriptions. Further difficulties arise when it comes to translate a word in another language, as interpretation often generates new ambiguities. I consider mortar pavements as the most suitable general term for this pavement type, because mortar is the basic component and at the same time the most neutral term. Finally, it seems appropriate to revisit the term of terrazzo-signinum used widely, (perhaps wrongly) in the French archaeological literature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Adam 1984 J. Adam, La construction romaine, Matériaux et techniques, Paris, Picard.
  2. Allamani − Misailidou 1992 V. Allamani – V. Misailidou, “Ανασκαφικές έρευνες στην αρχαία”, AErgMak 6, 208-212.
  3. Bats 2012 M. Bats, “Les Phocéens, Marseille et la Gaule (VIIe-IIIe s. av. J.-C.)”, Pallas 89, 145-156.
  4. Blake 1930 M. E. Blake, “The pavements of the Roman buildings of the Republic and Early Empire”, MAAR 8, 7-160.
  5. Bruneau 1972 P. Bruneau, Les Mosaïques, EAD XXIX, Paris, De Boccard.
  6. Bruneau 1982 P. Bruneau, “Pavimenta Poenica”, MEFRA 94-2, 639-655.
  7. Bulard 1908 M. Bulard, Peintures murales et mosaïques de Délos, Paris, Monuments et mémoires de la Fondation Eugène Piot 14.
  8. CAG Marseille 2005 M. Rothé – H. Tréziny, Carte archéologique de la Gaule, 13/3, Marseille et ses alentours, Paris, Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Arkeoloji

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Veronique Vassal Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Aralık 2016

Gönderilme Tarihi

25 Mayıs 2015

Kabul Tarihi

6 Kasım 2016

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2016 Sayı: 9

Kaynak Göster

APA
Vassal, V. (2016). Mortier et Béton de Sol : Un Etat de la Question. Journal of Mosaic Research, 9, 95-119. https://doi.org/10.26658/jmr.311213
AMA
1.Vassal V. Mortier et Béton de Sol : Un Etat de la Question. Journal of Mosaic Research. 2016;(9):95-119. doi:10.26658/jmr.311213
Chicago
Vassal, Veronique. 2016. “Mortier et Béton de Sol : Un Etat de la Question”. Journal of Mosaic Research, sy 9: 95-119. https://doi.org/10.26658/jmr.311213.
EndNote
Vassal V (01 Aralık 2016) Mortier et Béton de Sol : Un Etat de la Question. Journal of Mosaic Research 9 95–119.
IEEE
[1]V. Vassal, “Mortier et Béton de Sol : Un Etat de la Question”, Journal of Mosaic Research, sy 9, ss. 95–119, Ara. 2016, doi: 10.26658/jmr.311213.
ISNAD
Vassal, Veronique. “Mortier et Béton de Sol : Un Etat de la Question”. Journal of Mosaic Research. 9 (01 Aralık 2016): 95-119. https://doi.org/10.26658/jmr.311213.
JAMA
1.Vassal V. Mortier et Béton de Sol : Un Etat de la Question. Journal of Mosaic Research. 2016;:95–119.
MLA
Vassal, Veronique. “Mortier et Béton de Sol : Un Etat de la Question”. Journal of Mosaic Research, sy 9, Aralık 2016, ss. 95-119, doi:10.26658/jmr.311213.
Vancouver
1.Veronique Vassal. Mortier et Béton de Sol : Un Etat de la Question. Journal of Mosaic Research. 01 Aralık 2016;(9):95-119. doi:10.26658/jmr.311213

Cited By