Speakingin medias res: Modernism versus Modernity in Sherwood Anderson’s Winesburg, Ohio

Abstract

Since the times of Homeric epics, speaking in medias res has been the most suitable form of storytelling, leaving the threshold of narrative ajar in the present, upholding a historical sense. This ancient historical sense of time, inherent in oral traditions revived in early twentieth century literary Modernism as T. S. Eliot stated in his 1919 essay, “Tradition and The Individual Talent:” “... And it is at the same time what makes a writer most acutely conscious of his place in time, of his own contemporaneity.” Be it a messianic revival or primitivism, calling for a coherent context for all, the Modernists were in urge for new narrative techniques overcoming the devastating traumas of the World Wars, representing the shared experiences worldwide. In this respect, early twentieth-century Modernism provided a literary niche for a new generation of storytellers engaged in the momentous grasp of time coalescing with an epiphany. Thus, regarding the present global crises of humanity against which we need to retreat to our local worlds, a review on literary Modernism would suggest a solution as it had once achieved as an internationalist current by gathering the minds and shared experiences in recovering from the overwhelming forces of modernity. This article aims to review literary Modernism and its correspondence with ancient forms of storytelling and sense of time in Sherwood Anderson’s Winesburg, Ohio stories regarding the shared thematic motifs transcending the cultural and national boundaries in representing the overwhelming traumas of early twentieth century modernity

Keywords

• literary modernism
• modernity
• ancient storytelling
• modern American short story
• epiphany

Kaynakça

1. ABRAMS, M.H., (1993). A Glossary of Literary Terms. Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers
2. ANDERSON, S., (1992). Winesburg, Ohio. Penguin Classics.
3. AUERBACH, E., (1953). Mimesis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
4. BALIONG, E. S., (2016). “Fear in a Handful of Dust: Analogies of Destruction and Redemption Between Isaiah and T. S. Eliot’s The Waste Land.” Literary Study,
5. Carayan Journal. 2(1) [online], http://carayan.xu.edu.ph/fear-in-a-handful-of-dust- analogies-of-destruction-andredemption-between-isaiah-and-t-s-eliots-the-wasteland/[Accessed on February 12, 2021].
6. BOZKIR, A. H., (2021). Analytical Psychology of Carl Gustav Jung in Terms Of Psychology of Religion; And God as an Archetype of Collective Unconscious. MA. Dokuz Eylül University Graduate School of Social Sciences Departmentof Philosophy and Religion Sciences. (Unpublished Dissertation).
7. CALVINO, I., (2000). Why Read The Classics? Vintage.
8. CAMPBELL, J., (2004). The Hero With A Thousand Faces. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

9. CHILDS, P., (2000). Modernism. London: Routledge.
10. COWLEY, M., (1992). Introduction. Winesburg, Ohio. Sherwood Anderson. Penguin Classics.
11. ELIOT, T.S, (1934). T.S. Eliot Selected Poems. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.
12. ELIOT, T.S., (2009). “Tradition and The Individual Talent.” [online], Poetry Foundation. https://www.poetryfoundation.org/articles/69400/tradition-and-theindividual-talent[Accessed on March 22, 2021].
13. FRYE, N., (1982). The Great Code: The Bible And Literature. San Diego: Harcourt Brace &Company.
14. GOKCEN, N., (2002).“Women, Sacrality, And Artistic Creativity: Three Winesburg Stories. The Sherwood Anderson Review. XXVII (2): 7-19 The Official Publication of The Sherwood Anderson Society.
15. GOKÇEN, N. and AGIL, N., (2005). “Over Her Dead Body: Sherwood Anderson’s The Man Who Became a Woman and Death in the Woods.” Journal of American Studies of Turkey. (21): 17-25.
16. HARRIS, J. ed., (2001). Preface. Community And Civil Society. Ferdinand Tönnies. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.
17. HEMINGWAY, E., (1996). The Sun Also Rises. New York: Scribner Classics.
18. HOMER, (2007). The Odyssey. London: Vintage Books. • JUNG, C.G., (1969). The Archetypes and The Collective Unconscious. New York: Princeton University Press.
19. LANDA, J. A. G., (2004). “Aristotle’s Poetics.” SSRN Electronic Journal. [online]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262224737 [Accessed on November 20,2020].
20. PAPARELLA, E., (2007). “The Uniqueness of Giambattista Vico’s Poetic Philosophy.” Metanexus, [online]https://metanexus.net/uniqueness-giambattista-vicos-poeticphilosophy / [Accessed on January 11, 2021].
21. SCOFIELD, M., (2006). The Cambridge Introduction to the American Short Story. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. SMITH, J. J., (2011). “Locating the Short-Story Cycle.” Journal of Short Story in English. 57: 59-79 [online]. http://
23. journals.openedition.org/jsse/1182. [Accessed on August, 2020].
24. STEIN, G., (1993). Everybody’s Autobiography. Cambridge: Exact Change.
25. STOUCK, D., (1990). “Anderson’s Expressionist Art.” New Essays on Winesburg, Ohio. John W. Cowley ed. New York:Cambridge University Press.
26. THUNE, E. and PRIGOZY, R. eds., (1973). Short Stories: A Critical Anthology. New York: Macmillan Company.
27. TÖNNIES, F., (2001). Community And Civil Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. VICO, G., (1999). New Science. London: Penguin Books. • YEATS, W. B., (1989). “The Second Coming.” The Collected Poems of W. B. Yeats. [online], Poetry Foundation, https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/43290/the-secondcoming [Accessed on March 22, 2021].