PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING LITERATURE IN THE DIGITAL WORK ENVIRONMENT: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS

Öz

The aim of this study is to examine the research trends and thematic transformation of the psychological well-being literature in the context of the digital work environment through bibliometric analysis. For this purpose, studies containing the term “psychological well-being” in the Web of Science (WoS) database were examined, and 412 articles in the fields of management and business were included in the study based on the determined filtering criteria. The obtained dataset was evaluated through co-word and citation analyses using VOSviewer (1.6.18) software. The findings indicate that studies on psychological well-being have increased significantly, particularly after 2010. According to the co-word analysis results, the concepts of psychological well-being, employee well-being, job satisfaction, stress, and psychological capital occupy a central position in the literature. In addition, digitalization-oriented concepts such as Covid-19, remote working, social media, and metaverse have become more visible in recent years. Citation analysis results revealed that the most highly cited journals were Journal of Applied Psychology and Journal of Management.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Psychological well-being
• Digital work environment
• Employee well-being
• Bibliometric analysis
• Web of Science

DİJİTALLEŞEN ÇALIŞMA YAŞAMINDA PSİKOLOJİK İYİ OLUŞ LİTERATÜRÜ: BİBLİYOMETRİK BİR ANALİZ

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, dijitalleşen çalışma yaşamı bağlamında psikolojik iyi oluş literatüründeki araştırma eğilimlerini ve tematik dönüşümü bibliyometrik analiz yöntemiyle incelemektir. Bu doğrultuda Web of Science (WoS) veri tabanında “psychological well-being” terimini içeren çalışmalar taranmış ve belirlenen filtreleme kriterleri sonucunda yönetim ve işletme alanına ait 412 makale araştırma kapsamına dahil edilmiştir. Elde edilen veri seti, VOSviewer (1.6.18) programı kullanılarak ortak kelime ve atıf analizleri aracılığıyla değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular, psikolojik iyi oluş çalışmalarının özellikle 2010 yılı sonrasında belirgin biçimde arttığını göstermektedir. Ortak kelime analizi sonuçlarına göre psikolojik iyi oluş, çalışan iyi oluşu, iş tatmini, stres ve psikolojik sermaye kavramlarının literatürde merkezi konumda yer aldığı belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca Covid-19, uzaktan çalışma, sosyal medya ve metaverse gibi dijitalleşme odaklı kavramların son yıllarda daha görünür hâle geldiği görülmüştür. Atıf analizi sonuçlarına göre ise en fazla atıf alan dergilerin Journal of Applied Psychology ve Journal of Management olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• psikolojik iyi oluş
• dijitalleşen çalışma yaşamı
• çalışan iyi oluşu
• bibliyometrik analiz
• web of science

Kaynakça

1. Adelmann, P. K. (1987). Occupational complexity, control, and personal income: Their relation to psychological well-being in men and women. Journal of Applied Psychology, s. 529-537.
2. Ambhore, S., & Ofori, E. K. (2023). Exploring psychological well‐being in business and economics arena: A bibliometric analysis. Health Science Reports, s. 1-14.
3. Avey, J. B., Reichard, R. J., Luthans, F., & Mhatre, K. H. (2011). Meta‐analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Human resource development quarterly, s. 127-152.
4. Berg, J. M., Grant, A. M., & Johnson, V. (2010). When callings are calling: Crafting work and leisure in pursuit of unanswered occupational callings. Organization science, s. 973-994.
5. Carillo, K., Cachat-Rosset, G., Marsan, J., Saba, T., & Klarsfeld, A. (2021). Adjusting to epidemic-induced telework: Empirical insights from teleworkers in France. European Journal of Information Systems, s. 69-88.
6. Çevik, Z. (2022). Bibliyometrik Araştırmalarda Analiz Tekniklerinin Uygulanması: VOSviewer Paket Programı. O. Öztürk, & G. Gürler içinde, Bir Literatür İncelemesi Aracı Olarak: Bibliyometrik Analiz (s. 125-213). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
7. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, s. 572-575.
8. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of business research, s. 285-296.

9. Ertürk, M. (2023). Yönetim Alanındaki Psikolojik İyi Oluş Makalelerinin Bibliyometrik Analizi. Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, s. 280-312.
10. Keyes, C. L., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of personality and social psychology, s. 1007-1022.
11. Kniffin, K. M., Narayanan, J., Anseel, F., Antonakis, J., Ashford, S. P., Bakker, A. B., . . . van Vugt, M. (2021). COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. American Psychologist, s. 63-77.
12. Kúld, P. B., Kef, S., & Sterkenburg, P. S. (2021). Bibliometric mapping of psychological well-being among children with a visual impairment. British Journal of Visual Impairment, s. 131-146.
13. Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S. (2017). Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of management, s. 1854-1884.
14. Lim, S., Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. (2008). Personal and workgroup incivility: impact on work and health outcomes. Journal of applied psychology, s. 95-107.
15. Luthans, F. (2002). Positive organizational behavior: Developing and managing psychological strengths. Academy of Management Perspectives, s. 57-72.
16. Meske, C., & Junglas, I. (2021). Investigating the elicitation of employees’ support towards digital workplace transformation. Behaviour & Information Technology, s. 1120-1136.
17. Parasuraman, S., & Simmers, C. A. (2001). Type of employment, work–family conflict and well‐being: a comparative study. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, s. 551-568.
18. Parker, C. P., Baltes, B. B., Young, S. A., Huff, J. W., Altmann, R. A., LaCost, H. A., & Roberts, J. E. (2003). Relationships between psychological climate perceptions and work outcomes: a meta‐analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, s. 389-416.
19. Robinson, S. L., O’Reilly, J., & Wang, W. (2013). Invisible at work: An integrated model of workplace ostracism. Journal of Management, s. 203-231.
20. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual review of psychology, s. 141-166.
21. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, s. 1069-1081.
22. Ryff, C. D. (2013). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, s. 10-28.
23. Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of personality and social psychology, s. 719-727.
24. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2006). Best news yet on the six-factor model of well-being. Social science research, s. 1103-1119.
25. Sánchez-García, J., Vargas-Morúa, G., & Hernández-Sánchez, B. (2018). Entrepreneurs' well-being: a bibliometric review. Frontiers in psychology, s. 1-19.
26. Seligman, M. E. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. Simon and Schuster, s. 3-9.
27. Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive Psychology. American Psychologist, s. 5-14.
28. Singh, V., Verma, S., & Chaurasia, S. S. (2020). Mapping the themes and intellectual structure of corporate university: co-citation and cluster analyses. Scientometrics, s. 1275-1302.
29. Sonnentag, S., Binnewies, C., & Mojza, E. J. (2010). Staying well and engaged when demands are high: the role of psychological detachment. Journal of applied psychology, s. 965-976.
30. Şimşir, İ. (2022). Bibliyometri ve Bibliyometrik Analize İlişkin Kavramsal Çerçeve. O. Öztürk, & G. Gürler içinde, Bir Literatür İncelemesi Aracı Olarak: Bibliyometrik Analiz (s. 7-31). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
31. Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. scientometrics, s. 523-538.
32. Wang, B., Liu, J., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Achieving effective remote working during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied psychology, s. 16-59.
33. Wang, M. (2007). Profiling retirees in the retirement transition and adjustment process: examining the longitudinal change patterns of retirees' psychological well-being. Journal of applied psychology, s. 455-474.
34. Wright, T. A., & Cropanzano, R. (2000). Psychological well-being and job satisfaction as predictors of job performance. Journal of occupational health psychology, s. 84-94.
35. Yiğit, B., & Çakmak, B. Y. (2024). Discovering psychological well-being: A bibliometric review. Journal of Happiness Studies, s. 1-24.
36. Zheng, X., Zhu, W., Zhao, H., & Zhang, C. (2015). Employee well‐being in organizations: Theoretical model, scale development, and cross‐cultural validation. Journal of organizational behavior, s. 621-644.
37. Zika, S., & Chamberlain, K. (1992). On the relation between meaning in life and psychological well‐being. British journal of psychology, s. 133-145.
38. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational research methods, s. 429-472.