Klinik Araştırma

The Role of the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index in Predicting Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2 31 Ağustos 2022
PDF İndir
TR EN

The Role of the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index in Predicting Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Abstract

Objective: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a reliable treatment modality in patients with systolic dysfunction. However, not every patient appears to benefit from CRT. The systemic immune inflammation index (SII) is closely linked to the poor prognosis of various cardiovascular disorders. However, there is no study investigating whether SII has predictive value in determining response to CRT in dilated cardiomyopathy patients. Therefore, we intend to investigate the association between SII and response to CRT. Methods: A total of 220 patients (mean age 61.2±10.8 years; 120 men) implanted with CRT were involved in this study. Echocardiographic and laboratory measurements were evaluated prior to CRT. Response to CRT was determined as a≥ 15% decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume at one-year follow-up. Results: Patients grouped as CRT responders and non-responders. Of these, 143 (64.6%) were considered to be CRT responders, while the remaining 77 (33.4%) were non-responders. Female sex (OR: 3.823, CI: 1.568-9.324 p=0.003), QRS duration (OR: 1.224, CI: 1.158-1.335 p<0.001), and SII (OR: 0.996 CI: 0.995-0.997 p<0.001) were shown to be independent predictors of CRT response in multivariate analysis. A cut-off value of SII >825 estimated no response to CRT with 80% sensitivity and 75% specificity. Conclusions: SII was associated with unresponsiveness to CRT. Therefore, it may be used to determine optimal patient selection for CRT implantation in routine clinical practice.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J, et al. Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) Investigators. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(21):2140-50.
  2. 2. Linde C, Leclercq C, Rex S, et al. Long-term benefits of biventricular pacing in congestive heart failure: results from the MUltisite STimulation in cardiomyopathy (MUSTIC) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40(1):111-8.
  3. 3. Goldenberg I, Moss AJ, Hall WJ, et al. Predictors of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT). Circulation. 2011;124(14):1527-36.
  4. 4. Abraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL, et al. Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation. Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(24):1845-53.
  5. 5. Vasan RS, Sullivan LM, Roubenoff R, et al. Inflammatory markers and risk of heart failure in elderly subjects without prior myocardial infarction: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2003;107(11):1486-91.
  6. 6. Dick SA, Epelman S. Chronic Heart Failure and Inflammation: What Do We Really Know? Circ Res. 2016;119(1):159-76.
  7. 7. Agacdiken A, Celikyurt U, Sahin T, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Med Sci Monit. 2013;19:373-7.
  8. 8. Balci KG, Balci MM, Sen F, et al. The role of baseline indirect inflammatory markers in prediction of response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy. Kardiol Pol. 2016;74(2):119-26.

Ayrıntılar

Kaynak Göster

APA
Çelik, M., Küp, A., Demir, S., Gülşen, K., İzci, S., Yılmaz, A. S., Yılmaz, Y., Çelik, F. B., Kahraman, F., Tanırcan, M. R., Özgeyik, M., & Uslu, A. (2022). The Role of the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index in Predicting Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. Journal of Cukurova Anesthesia and Surgical Sciences, 5(2), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.36516/jocass.1139629
https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/journal-file/11303