Araştırma Makalesi

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation and Steroid Injection in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis

Cilt: 8 Sayı: 4 31 Aralık 2025
PDF İndir
EN TR

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation and Steroid Injection in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis

Abstract

Aim: The main goal of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of steroid injections and radiofrequency ablation as treatments for refractory chronic plantar fasciitis. Methods: Sixty patients with plantar fasciitis who had not responded to conservative treatment for at least 6 months were randomly divided into two groups. The first group received ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (n=30) and the second group received steroid injection (n=30). Patients were evaluated with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores before treatment, at 1 month and 6 months. Results: At the sixth month follow-up, the VAS score was 2.8 in the radiofrequency group and 4.2 in the steroid group (p<0.008). AOFAS scores were 85.3±6.8 in the radiofrequency group and 74.2±8.4 in the steroid group (p<0.003). Treatment success was 83.3% in the radiofrequency group and 63.3% in the steroid group. The need for repeat treatment was observed with a rate of 10% in the radiofrequency group and 26.7% in the steroid group. No serious complications were observed in both groups. Conclusion: Radiofrequency ablation proved superior to steroid injection as a treatment for chronic plantar fasciitis. The treatment achieved better results in pain management and functional improvement while requiring fewer follow-up procedures.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. 1.Riddle DL, Pulisic M, Sparrow K. Impact of demographic and impairment-related variables on disability associated with plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25(5):311-317. [Crossref]
  2. 2.Eke I, Akcal MA, Sayrac AV, Iyetin Y. Effects of intralesional pulsed radiofrequency treatment on pain in patients with calcaneal spur: results of 460 patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):1033. Published 2021 Dec 10. [Crossref]
  3. 3.Beale RJ, Gough MJ. Treatment options for primary varicose veins--a review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;30(1):83-95. [Crossref]
  4. 4.Armağan C, Karaduman ZO, Arıcan M, Turhan Y, Kaban İ, Uludağ V. Innovative approaches in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: comparison of pulsed radiofrequency ablation and surgical intervention. Int Orthop. 2024;48(10):2719-2726. [Crossref]
  5. 5.Nahin RL. Prevalence and Pharmaceutical Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis in United States Adults. J Pain. 2018;19(8):885-896. [Crossref]
  6. 6.Thor J, Mao DW, Chandrakumara D, Zheng Q, Yoo TW, Kon Kam King C. Radiofrequency microtenotomy for plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Foot (Edinb). 2022;50:101869. [Crossref]
  7. 7.Hansen L, Krogh TP, Ellingsen T, Bolvig L, Fredberg U. Long-Term Prognosis of Plantar Fasciitis: A 5- to 15-Year Follow-up Study of 174 Patients With Ultrasound Examination. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018;6(3):2325967118757983. Published 2018 Mar 6. [Crossref]
  8. 8.Kalaycıoğlu O, Ayanoğlu T, Yılmaz ÖF, Turhan MT. A cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Metatarsophalangeal-Interphalangeal Scale (AOFAS-MTP-IP) for the hallux. Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2023;34(2):305-314. Published 2023 May 25. [Crossref] 9.Gur G, Turgut E, Dilek B, Baltaci G, Bek N, Yakut Y. Validity and Reliability of Vis ual Analog Scale Foot and Ankle: The Turkish Version. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;56(6):1213-1217. [Crossref]

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Ortopedi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Aralık 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

29 Mayıs 2025

Kabul Tarihi

3 Aralık 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA
Perktaş, İ. (2025). Comparison of the Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation and Steroid Injection in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis. Journal of Cukurova Anesthesia and Surgical Sciences, 8(4), 384-389. https://doi.org/10.36516/jocass.1708662
https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/journal-file/11303