Evaluation of the Clinical Outcomes of Colostomy and Subtotal Colectomy in Patients with Paralytic Ileus Associated with Prolonged Hospitalization

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 4, 449 - 453, 31.12.2025

Fırat Aslan , Serhat Binici

https://doi.org/10.36516/jocass.1803420

https://izlik.org/JA24GF46EL

Öz

Aim: Paralytic ileus secondary to prolonged hospitalization may require surgery in patients unresponsive to conservative management. Colostomy allows rapid decompression, whereas subtotal colectomy offers a more definitive solution; however, comparative evidence remains limited.
Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective study of 13 patients aged ≥65 years hospitalized for≥14 days with paralytic ileus or distension refractory to conservative therapy. Four patients underwent sigmoidostomy, and nine underwent subtotal colectomy. Primary endpoints included mortality and major morbidity, while secondary endpoints encompassed ICU and total hospital stay, time to enteral feeding, need for reoperation, and quality of life.
Results: Sigmoidostomy was associated with shorter operative time (65 vs. 160 min, p<0.001), ICU stay (3 vs. 6 days, p=0.01), total hospital stay (10 vs. 18 days, p=0.01), and earlier enteral feeding (1 vs. 4 days, p=0.002). No mortality or major complications occurred in the sigmoidostomy group; subtotal colectomy had a mortality rate of 11.1% and a major complication rate of 22.2%. At six months, recurrent ileus was absent after subtotal colectomy, but mild distension recurred in the colostomy group. Quality-of-life scores were higher in the subtotal colectomy group, suggesting superior functional recovery.
Conclusion: Colostomy enables faster early recovery, while subtotal colectomy may reduce recurrence and improve mid-term functional outcomes in carefully selected patients. Surgical decision-making should account for frailty, nutritional and infection status, and therapeutic goals. Prospective multicenter studies are required to validate these findings.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Geriatric surgery , Paralytic ileus , Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (Ogilvie’s syndrome) , Colostomy , Subtotal colectomy

Etik Beyan

This study was approved by the Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Decision No: 2025/04-16, Date: 25/04/2025).

Destekleyen Kurum

NONE

Proje Numarası

NONE

Teşekkür

NONE

Uzun Süreli Hastane Yatışına Bağlı Olarak Gelişen Paralitik İleus Hastalarında Kolostomi ve Subtotal Kolektomi Uygulamalarının Klinik Sonuçlarının Değerlendirilmesi

https://izlik.org/JA24GF46EL

Öz

Amaç: Uzun süreli hastaneye yatışa bağlı gelişen paralitik ileus, konservatif tedaviye yanıt vermeyen hastalarda cerrahi müdahale gerektirebilir. Kolostomi hızlı dekompresyon sağlarken, subtotal kolektomi daha kalıcı bir çözüm sunar; ancak karşılaştırmalı kanıtlar sınırlıdır.

Yöntemler: Paralitik ileus veya konservatif tedaviye dirençli distansiyon nedeniyle ≥14 gün hastanede yatan ve ≥65 yaşındaki 13 hasta ile tek merkezli retrospektif bir çalışma yaptık. Dört hastaya sigmoidostomi, dokuz hastaya subtotal kolektomi uygulandı. Primer uç noktalar mortalite ve majör morbidite iken, sekonder uç noktalar yoğun bakım ve toplam hastane yatış süresi, enteral beslenmeye başlama zamanı, reoperasyon ihtiyacı ve yaşam kalitesi olarak belirlendi.

Bulgular: Sigmoidostomi, daha kısa operasyon süresi (65 vs. 160 dk, p<0,001), yoğun bakım yatış süresi (3 vs. 6 gün, p=0,01), toplam hastane yatış süresi (10 vs. 18 gün, p=0,01) ve daha erken enteral beslenme (1 vs. 4 gün, p=0,002) ile ilişkiliydi. Sigmoidostomi grubunda mortalite veya majör komplikasyon gözlenmedi; subtotal kolektomi grubunda mortalite oranı %11,1 ve majör komplikasyon oranı %22,2 idi. Altı ayda, subtotal kolektomi sonrası ileus tekrarı görülmezken, kolostomi grubunda hafif distansiyon yeniden ortaya çıktı. Yaşam kalitesi skorları subtotal kolektomi grubunda daha yüksek bulunarak, fonksiyonel iyileşmenin daha iyi olduğunu gösterdi.

Sonuç: Kolostomi, erken dönemde daha hızlı iyileşme sağlarken, subtotal kolektomi tekrar riskini azaltabilir ve orta dönem fonksiyonel sonuçları iyileştirebilir. Cerrahi karar verirken, frailty (kırılganlık), beslenme ve enfeksiyon durumu ile tedavi hedefleri göz önünde bulundurulmalıdır. Bu bulguları doğrulamak için prospektif çok merkezli çalışmalara ihtiyaç vardır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Geriatrik cerrahi , Paralitik ileus , Akut kolonik psödo-obstrüksiyon (Ogilvie sendromu) , Kolostomi , Subtotal kolektomi

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma, Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Girişimsel Olmayan Klinik Araştırmalar Etik Kurulu tarafından onaylanmıştır (Karar No: 2025/04-16, Tarih: 25/04/2025).

Destekleyen Kurum

YOK

Proje Numarası

NONE

Teşekkür

YOK

Kaynakça

• 1.Vather R, O'Grady G, Bissett IP, Dinning PG. Postoperative ileus: mechanisms and future directions for research. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2014;41(5):358-70. [Crossref]
• 2.Venara A, Neunlist M, Slim K, Barbieux J, Colas PA, Hamy A, et al. Postoperative ileus: pathophysiology, incidence, and prevention. J Visc Surg. 2016;153(6):439-46. [Crossref]
• 3.Reintam Blaser A, Preiser JC, Fruhwald S, Wilmer A, Wernerman J, Benstoem C, et al. Gastrointestinal dysfunction in the critically ill: a systematic scoping review and research agenda proposed by the Section of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Nutrition of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):224. [Crossref]
• 4.Boeckxstaens GE, de Jonge WJ. Neuroimmune mechanisms in postoperative ileus. Gut. 2009;58(9):1300-11. [Crossref]
• 5.Story SK, Chamberlain RS. A comprehensive review of evidence-based strategies to prevent and treat postoperative ileus. Dig Surg. 2009;26(4):265-75. [Crossref]
• 6.Reintam Blaser A, Malbrain ML, Starkopf J, Fruhwald S, Jakob SM, De Waele J, et al. Gastrointestinal function in intensive care patients: terminology, definitions and management. Recommendations of the ESICM Working Group on Abdominal Problems. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(3):384-94. [Crossref]
• 7.Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(3):292-8. [Crossref]
• 8.Vanek VW, Al-Salti M. Acute pseudo-obstruction of the colon (Ogilvie's syndrome). An analysis of 400 cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 1986;29(3):203-10. [Crossref]
• 9.Pereira P, Djeudji F, Leduc P, Fanget F, Barth X. Ogilvie's syndrome-acute colonic pseudo-obstruction. J Visc Surg. 2015;152(2):99-105. [Crossref]
• 10.Hazem BA, Salah B, Mohamed Issam B. Treatment of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction Ogilvie's syndrome. Systematic Review. 2013.
• 11.De Giorgio R, Knowles CH. Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction. Br J Surg. 2009;96(3):229-39. [Crossref]
• 12.Shellito PC. Complications of abdominal stoma surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41(12):1562-72. [Crossref]
• 13.Park JJ, Del Pino A, Orsay CP, Nelson RL, Pearl RK, Cintron JR, et al. Stoma complications: the Cook County Hospital experience. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42(12):1575-80. [Crossref]
• 14.Chapman SJ, Pericleous A, Downey C, Jayne DG. Postoperative ileus following major colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2018;105(7):797-810. [Crossref]
• 15.Valle RG, Godoy FL. Neostigmine for acute colonic pseudo-obstruction: a meta-analysis. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2014;3(3):60-4. [Crossref]
• 16.Jain A, Vargas HD. Advances and challenges in the management of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (Ogilvie syndrome). Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2012;25(1):37-45. [Crossref]
• 17.Harrison ME, Anderson MA, Appalaneni V, Banerjee S, Ben-Menachem T, Cash BD, et al. The role of endoscopy in the management of patients with known and suspected colonic obstruction and pseudo-obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71(4):669-79. [Crossref]
• 18.Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M, Nygren J, Demartines N, Francis N, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations: 2018. World J Surg. 2019;43(3):659-95. [Crossref]
• 19.McIsaac DI, Taljaard M, Bryson GL, Beaulé PE, Gagné S, Hamilton G, et al. Frailty as a predictor of death or new disability after surgery: a prospective cohort study. Ann Surg. 2020;271(2):283-9. [Crossref]
• 20.Tang Z, Huang Z, Yan W, Zhang Y, Shi P, Dong K, et al. Complications of enterostomy and related risk factor analysis of very early onset inflammatory bowel disease with interleukin-10 signalling deficiency: a single-centre retrospective analysis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020;20(1):8. [Crossref]
• 21.Young LS, Huong PTT, Lam NT, Thu NN, Van HT, Hanh NL, et al. Nutritional status and feeding practices in gastrointestinal surgery patients at Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2016;25(3):513.
• 22.McIsaac DI, Taljaard M, Bryson GL, Beaulé PE, Gagné S, Hamilton G, et al. Frailty as a predictor of death or new disability after surgery: a prospective cohort study. Ann Surg. 2020;271(2):283-9. [Crossref]
• 23.Reignier J, Thenoz-Jost N, Fiancette M, Legendre E, Lebert C, Bontemps F, et al. Early enteral nutrition in mechanically ventilated patients in the prone position. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(1):94-9. [Crossref]
• 24.Demetriou G, Ghoneim A, Dattani M, Bedford M. Neostigmine versus Colonoscopic Decompression for Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction Not Resolving With Conservative Measures: A Meta-Analysis. J Surg Res. 2025;313:89-95. [Crossref]