Comparing Surgical Treatment Options for Intracranial Arachnoid Cysts; Radiological, Clinical and Histopathological Outcomes of the Operated Patients

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 4, 507 - 513, 31.12.2025

Ebru Güzel , Kadir Oktay , Fulya Adamhasan , İbrahim Sarı , Ali İhsan Ökten , Kaya Bilguvar , Mustafa Kemal Demir , Aslan Guzel

https://doi.org/10.36516/jocass.1818403

Öz

Aim: This study was designed to examine patients who underwent surgery for arachnoid cysts and compare surgical treatment options in terms of clinical, radiological and histopathological outcomes.
Methods: Data obtained from 47 patients who underwent surgery for arachnoid cysts at 3 neurosurgery institutions between November 2002 and January 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. As the surgical interventions, two methods were performed; cyst fenestration with craniotomy, and cystoperitoneal shunt.
Results: The mean age of the patients was 12.7 ± 11.3 years. Among them, 18 (38.3%) were female and 29 (61.7%) were male. 40 were pediatric and 7 were adult patients. In the study group, 32 patients (68%) underwent fenestration with craniotomy, while 15 patients (32%) underwent cystoperitoneal shunt application. The mean reduction rates of the cyst volume were determined as 51.4%. When comparing the surgeries performed, no statistically significant difference was found between the reduction rates (p>0.05). The group with the highest reduction rates was detected as convexity cysts treated with fenestration with a rate of 73.9%. In the postoperative period, the symptoms of 29 patients (62%) completely resolved, while the symptoms of 14 patients (30%) improved. Symptoms did not change in 3 patients (6%), and worsening was observed in 1 patient (2%). When comparing the surgeries performed, the rate of complete resolution of symptoms was found to be statistically significantly higher in the fenestration group (p=0.01). Postoperative cyst volumes were found higher in the patients with edema positivity (p=0.031) and thickening of basal lamina negativity (p=0.046). Preoperative mass effect was found statistically significant in the patients with edema positivity (p=0.006) and thickening of basal lamina negativity (p=0.013). Postoperative mass effect reduction was also found statistically significant in the patients with edema positivity (p=0.024) and thickening of basal lamina negativity (p=0.002).
Conclusions: The present study revealed that fenestration with craniotomy seems to be a favorable technique as the first step in the treatment of arachnoid cysts. The rate of complete resolution of symptoms was higher in the fenestration group and complication rates were higher in the cystoperitoneal shunt group. However, we think that the patients with coexistence of arachnoid cyst and hydrocephalus should be treated with cystoperitoneal shunt application. We also found that the membrane thickness of arachnoid cysts and the amount of collagen increases as the patients’ age increases and tissue edema increases in younger patients. Preoperative mass effect, and postoperative reduction in mass effect correlated positively with tissue edema and negatively with basal lamina thickness.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Arachnoid cyst , fenestration , cystoperitoneal shunt , hydrocephalus , histopathology

İntrakranial Araknoid Kistlerde Cerrahi Tedavi Seçeneklerinin Karşılaştırılması; Ameliyat Edilen Hastaların Radyolojik, Klinik ve Histopatolojik Sonuçları

Öz

Giriş: Bu çalışma, araknoid kist nedeniyle cerrahi uygulanan hastaları incelemek ve cerrahi tedavi seçeneklerini klinik, radyolojik ve histopatolojik sonuçlar açısından karşılaştırmak amacıyla tasarlanmıştır.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Kasım 2002 ile Ocak 2020 tarihleri arasında 3 nöroşirürji merkezinde araknoid kist nedeniyle cerrahi uygulanan 47 hastanın verileri retrospektif olarak incelendi. Cerrahi girişim olarak kraniotomi ile kist fenestrasyonu ve kistoperitoneal şant olmak üzere iki yöntem uygulandı.
Sonuç: Hastaların yaş ortalaması 12,7 ± 11,3 yıldı. Bunlardan 18’i (%38,3) kadın, 29’u (%61,7) erkekti. 40’ı pediatrik, 7’si erişkin hastaydı. Çalışma grubunda 32 hastaya (%68) kraniotomi ile fenestrasyon uygulanırken, 15 hastaya (%32) kistoperitoneal şant uygulandı. Kist hacmindeki ortalama küçülme oranları %51,4 olarak belirlendi. Yapılan ameliyatlar karşılaştırıldığında küçülme oranları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmadı (p>0,05). En yüksek küçülme oranına sahip grup %73,9 oranında fenestrasyon ile tedavi edilen konveksite kistleri olarak saptandı. Ameliyat sonrası dönemde 29 hastanın (%62) semptomları tamamen düzelirken, 14 hastanın (%30) semptomlarında iyileşme görüldü. Semptomlar 3 hastada (%6) değişmezken, 1 hastada (%2) kötüleşme görüldü. Yapılan cerrahiler karşılaştırıldığında, fenestrasyon grubunda semptomların tamamen düzelme oranı istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde daha yüksek bulundu (p=0,01). Ödem pozitifliği (p=0,031) ve bazal lamina kalınlaşması negatifliği (p=0,046) olan hastalarda postoperatif kist hacimleri daha yüksek bulundu. Ödem pozitifliği (p=0,006) ve bazal lamina kalınlaşması negatifliği (p=0,013) olan hastalarda preoperatif kitle etkisi istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu. Ödem pozitifliği (p=0,024) ve bazal lamina kalınlaşması negatifliği (p=0,002) olan hastalarda postoperatif kitle etkisi azalması da istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu (p=0,002).
Tartışma: Çalışmamızda kraniotomi ile fenestrasyonu araknoid kistlerin tedavisinde ilk basamak olarak olumlu bir teknik olarak görünmektedir. Fenestrasyon grubunda semptomların tam olarak düzelme oranı daha yüksek, kistoperitoneal şant grubunda ise komplikasyon oranları daha yüksek bulunmuştur. Ancak araknoid kist ve hidrosefali birlikteliği olan hastaların kistoperitoneal şant uygulaması ile tedavi edilmesi gerektiğini düşünmekteyiz. Ayrıca araknoid kistlerin membran kalınlığının ve kollajen miktarının hastaların yaşı arttıkça arttığını ve genç hastalarda doku ödeminin arttığını saptadık. Ameliyat öncesi kitle etkisi ve ameliyat sonrası kitle etkisindeki azalmanın doku ödemi ile pozitif, bazal lamina kalınlığı ile negatif korelasyon gösterdiği görüldü.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Araknoid kist , fenestrasyon , kistoperitoneal şant , hidrosefali , histopatoloji

Kaynakça

• 1.Ali M, Bennardo M, Almenawer SA, et al. Exploring predictors of surgery and comparing operative treatment approaches for pediatric intracranial arachnoid cysts: a case series of 83 patients. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015;16(3):275-82. [Crossref]
• 2.Gangemi M, Seneca V, Colella G, Cioffi V, Imperato A, Maiuri F. Endoscopy versus microsurgical cyst excision and shunting for treating intracranial arachnoid cysts. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011;8(2):158-64. [Crossref]
• 3.Harsh GR 4th, Edwards MS, Wilson CB. Intracranial arachnoid cysts in children. J Neurosurg. 1986;64(6):835-42. [Crossref]
• 4.Zada G, Krieger MD, McNatt SA, Bowen I, McComb JG. Pathogenesis and treatment of intracranial arachnoid cysts in pediatric patients younger than 2 years of age. Neurosurg Focus. 2007;22(2):E1. [Crossref]
• 5.Dang M, Modi J, Roberts M, Chan C, Mitchell JR. Validation study of a fast, accurate, and precise brain tumor volume measurement. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2013;111(2):480-7. [Crossref]
• 6.Bright R. Disease of the brain and nervous system. In: Taylor R, ed. Reports of medical cases selected with a view of illustrating the symptoms and cure of diseases by a reference to morbid anatomy. London: Longman, Rees, Orne, Brown, Green and Highley; 1831:1827-31.
• 7.Lu J, Zhu XL. Cranial arachnoid membranes: some aspects of microsurgical anatomy. Clin Anat. 2007;20(5):502-11. [Crossref]
• 8.Hund-Georgiadis M, Yves Von Cramon D, Kruggel F, Preul C. Do quiescent arachnoid cysts alter CNS functional organization?: A fMRI and morphometric study. Neurology. 2002;59(12):1935-9. [Crossref]
• 9.Ibarra R, Kesava PP. Role of MR Imaging in the diagnosis of complicated arachnoid cyst. Pediatr Radiol. 2000;30(5):329-31. [Crossref]
• 10.Wester K. Peculiarities of intracranial arachnoid cysts: location, sidedness, and sex distribution in 126 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery. 1999;45(4):775-9. [Crossref]
• 11.Tan Z, Li Y, Zhu F, et al. Children with intracranial arachnoid cysts: Classification and treatment. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(44):e1749. [Crossref]
• 12.Choi JU, Kim DS. Pathogenesis of arachnoid cyst: congenital or traumatic? Pediatr Neurosurg. 1998;29(5):260-6. [Crossref]
• 13.Kim TG, Kim DS, Choi JU. Are arachnoid cysts localized hydrocephali? Pediatr Neurosurg. 2010;46(5):362-7. [Crossref]
• 14.Guzel A, Tatli M, Kilincer C, Yilmaz F. Posttraumatic intraventricular arachnoid cyst accompanied by pseudomeningoencephalocele in a child. J Clin Neurosci. 2007;14(12):1210-3. [Crossref]
• 15.Rengachary SS, Watanabe I. Ultrastructure and pathogenesis of intracranial arachnoid cysts. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1981;40(1):61-83. [Crossref]
• 16.Gosalakkal JA. Intracranial arachnoid cysts in children: a review of pathogenesis, clinical features, and management. Pediatr Neurol. 2002;26(2):93-8. [Crossref]
• 17.Caruso R, Salvati M, Cervoni L. Primary intracranial arachnoid cyst in the elderly. Neurosurg Rev. 1994;17(3):195-8. [Crossref]
• 18.Go KG, Houthoff HJ, Blaauw EH, Havinga P, Hartsuiker J. Arachnoid cysts of the sylvian fissure. Evidence of fluid secretion. J Neurosurg. 1984;60(4):803-13. [Crossref]
• 19.Schroeder HW, Gaab MR. Endoscopic observation of a slit-valve mechanism in a suprasellar prepontine arachnoid cyst: case report. Neurosurgery. 1997;40(1):198-200. [Crossref]
• 20.da Silva JA, Alves A, Talina M, Carreiro S, Guimaraes J, Xavier M. Arachnoid cyst in a patient with psychosis: Case report. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2007;6:16. [Crossref]
• 21.Raffel C, McComb JG. To shunt or to fenestrate: which is the best surgical treatment for arachnoid cysts in pediatric patients? Neurosurgery. 1988;23(3):338-42. [Crossref]
• 22.Guzel A, Tatli M, Bilguvar K, et al. Apparently novel genetic syndrome of pachygyria, mental retardation, seizure, and arachnoid cysts. Am J Med Genet A. 2007;143A(7):672-7. [Crossref]
• 23.Lütcherath V, Waaler PE, Jellum E, Wester K. Children with bilateral temporal arachnoid cysts may have glutaric aciduria type 1 (GAT1); operation without knowing that may be harmful. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2000;142(9):1025-30. [Crossref]
• 24.Wang PJ, Lin HC, Liu HM, Tseng CL, Shen YZ. Intracranial arachnoid cysts in children: related signs and associated anomalies. Pediatr Neurol. 1998;19(2):100-4. [Crossref]
• 25.Bilguvar K, Ozturk AK, Bayrakli F, et al. The syndrome of pachygyria, mental retardation, and arachnoid cysts maps to 11p15. Am J Med Genet A. 2009;149A(11):2569-72. [Crossref]
• 26.Al-Holou WN, Yew AY, Boomsaad ZE, Garton HJ, Muraszko KM, Maher CO. Prevalence and natural history of arachnoid cysts in children. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2010;5(6):578-85. [Crossref]
• 27.Arroyo S, Santamaria J. What is the relationship between arachnoid cysts and seizure foci? Epilepsia. 1997;38(10):1098-1102. [Crossref]
• 28.Yalcin AD, Oncel C, Kaymaz A, Kuloglu N, Forta H. Evidence against association between arachnoid cysts and epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2002;49(3):255-60. [Crossref]
• 29.Golash A, Mitchell G, Mallucci C, May P, Pilling D. Prenatal diagnosis of suprasellar arachnoid cyst and postnatal endoscopic treatment. Childs Nerv Syst. 2001;17(12):739-42. [Crossref]
• 30.Helland CA, Wester K. A population based study of intracranial arachnoid cysts: clinical and neuroimaging outcomes following surgical cyst decompression in adults. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78(10):1129-35. [Crossref]
• 31.Algin O, Hakyemez B, Parlak M. Phase-contrast MRI and 3D-CISS versus contrast-enhanced MR cisternography on the evaluation of the aqueductal stenosis. Neuroradiology. 2010;52(2):99-108. [Crossref]
• 32.Yildiz H, Erdogan C, Yalcin R, et al. Evaluation of communication between intracranial arachnoid cysts and cisterns with phase-contrast cine MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26(1):145-51.
• 33.Hoffmann KT, Hosten N, Meyer BU, et al. CSF flow studies of intracranial cysts and cyst-like lesions achieved using reversed fast imaging with steady-state precession MR sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21(3):493-502.
• 34.Hakyemez B, Aksoy U, Yildiz H, Ergin N. Intracranial epidermoid cysts: diffusion-weighted, FLAIR and conventional MR findings. Eur J Radiol. 2005;54(2):214-20. [Crossref]
• 35.Lai PH, Hsu SS, Ding SW, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted imaging in intracranial cystic mass lesions. Surg Neurol. 2007;68 Suppl 1:S25-36. [Crossref]
• 36.Seizeur R, Forlodou P, Coustans M, Dam-Hieu P. Spontaneous resolution of arachnoid cysts: review and features of an unusual case. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2007;149(1):75-8. [Crossref]
• 37.Weber R, Voit T, Lumenta C, Lenard HG. Spontaneous regression of a temporal arachnoid cyst. Childs Nerv Syst. 1991;7(7):414-5. [Crossref]
• 38.Prabhu VC, Bailes JE. Chronic subdural hematoma complicating arachnoid cyst secondary to soccer-related head injury: case report. Neurosurgery. 2002;50(1):195-7. [Crossref]
• 39.Rogers MA, Klug GL, Siu KH. Middle fossa arachnoid cysts in association with subdural haematomas. A review and recommendations for management. Br J Neurosurg. 1990;4(6):497-502. [Crossref]
• 40.Fewel ME, Levy ML, McComb JG. Surgical treatment of 95 children with 102 intracranial arachnoid cysts. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1996;25(4):165-73. [Crossref]
• 41.Galassi E, Gaist G, Giuliani G, Pozzati E. Arachnoid cysts of the middle cranial fossa: experience with 77 cases treated surgically. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1988;42:201-4. [Crossref]
• 42.Oberbauer RW, Haase J, Pucher R. Arachnoid cysts in children: a European co-operative study. Childs Nerv Syst. 1992;8(5):281-6. [Crossref]
• 43.Elhammady MS, Bhatia S, Ragheb J. Endoscopic fenestration of middle fossa arachnoid cysts: a technical description and case series. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2007;43(3):209-15. [Crossref]
• 44.Ersahin Y, Kesikci H, Ruksen M, Aydin C, Mutluer S. Endoscopic treatment of suprasellar arachnoid cysts. Childs Nerv Syst. 2008;24(9):1013-20. [Crossref]
• 45.Ciricillo SF, Cogen PH, Harsh GR, Edwards MS. Intracranial arachnoid cysts in children. A comparison of the effects of fenestration and shunting. J Neurosurg. 1991;74(2):230-5. [Crossref]