Polypharmacy and Accompanying Comorbid Conditions in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Study

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3, 313 - 319, 30.09.2025

Engin Onan , Saime Paydas , Mustafa Balal , Hülya Taşkapan , İlter Bozacı

Öz

Background:
Kidney transplantation improves survival and quality of life, yet post-transplant care frequently necessitates complex pharmacotherapy due to immunosuppressive regimens and management of comorbidities. This often results in polypharmacy, which is associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the immunosuppressive and other medications used in kidney transplant recipients, as well as the accompanying comorbid conditions.
Methods:
In this cross-sectional, multicenter study, 342 kidney transplant recipients were stratified into two groups: low-risk (≤5 medications) and moderate-to-high risk (≥6 medications) polypharmacy. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were analyzed to identify predictors of polypharmacy using multivariate logistic regression.
Results:
Moderate-to-high polypharmacy was observed in 64.9% of patients. This group had significantly higher creatinine, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and glucose levels, and lower eGFR and hemoglobin values (all p < 0.05). Hypertension, diabetes, and coronary artery disease were more common in this group (p = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, hypertension (OR: 4.615), proton pump inhibitor use (OR: 5.705), and allopurinol use (OR: 10.894) were independently associated with polypharmacy, while anticoagulant use was inversely associated (OR: 0.237; all p < 0.01).
Conclusion:
Polypharmacy is prevalent among our kidney transplant recipients and is associated with impaired graft function, anemia, and higher comorbidity burden. Certain medications, particularly PPIs and allopurinol, are strong predictors of polypharmacy. These findings highlight the need for individualized medication review, deprescribing strategies, and integration of pharmacogenomics into routine care to optimize outcomes in transplant recipients.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Polypharmacy , Kidney transplantation , Comorbidities , Medication manage-ment , Immunosuppressive therapy

Böbrek Nakli Alıcılarında Polifarmasi ve Eşlik Eden Komorbid Durumlar: Retrospektif Bir Çalışma

Öz

Giriş:
Böbrek nakli, hastaların yaşam süresini ve kalitesini artırır; ancak nakil sonrası bakım, immünsüpresif tedavi ve komorbid hastalıkların yönetimi nedeniyle çoğu zaman karmaşık bir ilaç tedavisini zorunlu kılar. İmmünsüpresif tedavilerin ve eşlik eden hastalıkların yönetimi, genellikle polifarmasiye neden olur; bu da advers olayların gelişme riskini önemli ölçüde artırır. Bu çalışmada, böbrek nakli alıcılarında kullanılan immünsüpresif ve diğer ilaçları ile eşlik eden komorbid durumları değerlendirmeyi amaçladık.
Yöntemler:
Bu çok merkezli, kesitsel çalışmada, 342 böbrek nakli alıcısı düşük riskli (≤5 ilaç) ve orta-yüksek riskli (≥6 ilaç) polifarmasi gruplarına ayrıldı. Polifarmasiyi öngören faktörleri belirlemek için demografik, klinik ve laboratuvar verileri çok değişkenli lojistik regresyon analizi ile değerlendirildi.
Bulgular:
Hastaların %64,9’unda orta-yüksek düzeyde polifarmasi gözlendi. Bu grupta kreatinin, kan üre azotu ve glukoz düzeyleri anlamlı derecede daha yüksek; tahmini GFR ve hemoglobin düzeyleri ise daha düşüktü (tüm p < 0,05). Hipertansiyon, diyabet ve koroner arter hastalığı bu grupta daha yaygındı (p = 0,001). Çok değişkenli analizde hipertansiyon (OR: 4,615), proton pompa inhibitörü kullanımı (OR: 5,705) ve allopurinol kullanımı (OR: 10,894) polifarmasi ile bağımsız olarak ilişkiliydi; antikoagülan kullanımı ise ters yönde ilişkiliydi (OR: 0,237; tüm p < 0,01).
Sonuç:
Böbrek nakli alıcılarımızda polifarmasi yaygındır ve bozulmuş greft fonksiyonu, anemi ve yüksek komorbidite yükü ile ilişkilidir. Özellikle PPI ve allopurinol gibi bazı ilaçlar polifarmasinin güçlü belirleyicileridir. Bu bulgular, transplant alıcılarında bireyselleştirilmiş ilaç değerlendirmesi, ilaç bırakma stratejileri ve farmakogenomiğin rutin bakıma entegrasyonunun önemini vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Polifarmasi , Böbrek nakli , Komorbiditeler , İlaç yönetimi , İmmünsüpresif tedavi

Kaynakça

• 1. Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, et al. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(23):1725–30. [Crossref]
• 2. Lentine KL, Lam NN, Segev DL. Risks of living kidney donation: current state of knowledge on outcomes important to donors. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;14(4):597–608. [Crossref]
• 3. Harhay MN, Rao MK, Woodside KJ, et al. An overview of frailty in kidney transplan-tation: measurement, management and future considerations. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020;35(7):1099–112. [Crossref]
• 4. Woźniak I, Kolonko A, Chudek J, Nowak Ł, Farnik M, Więcek A. Influence of polypharmacy on the quality of life in stable kidney transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 2018;50(6):1896–9. [Crossref]
• 5. Kosoku A, Iwai T, Kabei K, et al. Hyperpolypharmacy and frailty in kidney transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 2022;54(2):367–73. [Crossref]
• 6. Jin R, Liu C, Chen J, et al. Exploring medication self-management in polypharmacy: a qualitative systematic review of patients and healthcare providers perspectives. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1426777. [Crossref]
• 7. Alotaibi M, Trollinger B, Kant S. Management of kidney transplant recipients for pri-mary care practitioners. BMC Nephrol. 2024;25(1):102. [Crossref]
• 8. Oosting IJ, Colombijn JMT, Kaasenbrood L, et al. Polypharmacy in patients with CKD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kidney360. 2024;5(6):841–50. [Cross-ref]
• 9. Atić A, Matijašević Škerlj J, Jurić I, et al. Factors associated with hyperpolypharmacy and complex medication regimens in kidney transplant recipients. J Clin Med. 2024;13(13):3716. [Crossref]
• 10. Eckardt KU, Delgado C, Heerspink HJL, et al. Trends and perspectives for improving quality of chronic kidney disease care: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference. Kidney Int. 2023;104(5):888–903. [Crossref]
• 11. Kang H, Hong SH. Risk of kidney dysfunction from polypharmacy among older pati-ents: a nested case-control study. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):10440. [Crossref]
• 12. van Oosten MJM, Logtenberg SJJ, Hemmelder MH, Leegte MJH, Bilo HJG, Jager KJ, et al. Polypharmacy and medication use in patients with chronic kidney disease with and without kidney replacement therapy compared to matched controls. Clin Kidney J. 2021;14(12):2497–523. [Crossref]
• 13. Edinoff AN, Wu NW, Parker K, et al. Proton pump inhibitors, kidney damage, and mortality: an updated narrative review. Adv Ther. 2023;40(6):2693–709. [Crossref]
• 14. Saliba F, Mourad O, Mina J, et al. Treatment of gout in patients with CrCl ≤30 mL/min and/or on hemodialysis: a review. Rheumato. 2024;4:49–62. [Crossref]
• 15. Sullivan PM, William A, Tichy EM. Hyperuricemia and gout in solid-organ transplant: update in pharmacological management. Prog Transplant. 2015;25(3):263–70. [Cross-ref]
• 16. Katlan D, Hasan H, Aseeri M, et al. The prevalence of medication-related problems in kidney transplant recipients at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. Ren Replace Ther. 2024;10:43. [Crossref]
• 17. Gago-Sánchez AI, Font P, Cárdenas M, Aumente MD, Del Prado JR, Calleja MÁ. Real clinical impact of drug-drug interactions of immunosuppressants in transplant pa-tients. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2021;9(6):e00892. [Crossref]
• 18. Urzì Brancati V, Scarpignato C, Minutoli L, Pallio G. Use of pharmacogenetics to op-timize immunosuppressant therapy in kidney-transplanted patients. Biomedicines. 2022;10(8):1798. [Crossref]
• 19. Sakamoto JI, Shikata T, Ito S, et al. Polypharmacy is associated with accelerated dete-rioration of renal function in cardiovascular outpatients. Cardiol Res. 2020;11(1):15–21. [Crossref]
• 20. Quek HW, Page A, Lee K, et al. The effect of deprescribing interventions on mortality and health outcomes in older people: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2024;90(10):2409–82. [Crossref]