Suç Ekonomisinin Genel Çerçevesi ve Bibliyometrik Literatür Analizi

Öz

Suç ekonomisi temel ekonomik sorunlar ve amaçlarla doğrudan alakalı konulara odaklanmakta ve geleneksel çalışma alanlarına göre daha özgün araştırma olanakları sunmaktadır. Özellikle ekonomik kalkınma dinamikleri açısından çok yönlü bir bakış açısıyla geniş bir inceleme alanı sunmaktadır. Daha önce bu alanda yapılmış çalışmalar, bu çalışmaların odaklandığı anahtar kavramlar, bu konulara odaklanmış araştırmacılar, konunun çalışıldığı ülke veya kurumlar, çalışmaların yayınlandığı dergiler arasındaki bağlantılar ve çalışmaların yararlandığı kaynaklar arasındaki benzerlikler suç ekonomisi alanında literatürün nasıl şekillendiği ve ne gibi potansiyel boşlukların yakalanabileceğine dair önemli ipuçları sağlamaktadır. Bunun için bibliyometrik literatür analizi, önde gelen dergileri, yazarları, makaleleri, anahtar kelimeleri, kurumları, ülkeleri, ortak yazarlığı, ortak alıntıyı, ortak oluşumu ve bibliyografik eşleşmeleri belirlemek ve sınıflandırmak için iyi ve pratik bir yöntem olarak tanımlamaktadır. Çünkü bu sayede mevcut ve gelecekteki araştırmacıların analiz edilen konunun yeni boyutlarını keşfetmelerini sağlar. Ayrıca mevcut kaynaklar ve bunların entelektüel yapılarının daha geniş bir değerlendirmesini sağlayarak araştırılan konu hakkında daha derin bakış açısı sağlayarak, bilgi akışı ve fikirlerin yayılımını izlemek için uygun bir zemin hazırlar. Bu sebeple, mevcut çalışma HistCite ve VOSviewer yazılımlarıyla suç ekonomisi alanında 1980-2021 döneminde Web of Science indeksli kaynaklarda yayımlanmış çalışmaların bibliyometrik analizini gerçekleştirmiştir. Analiz bulguları ve görseller sonraki araştırmalar için daha özgün çalışma alanları, kişi, kurum veya ülke bazlı iş birlikleri, dergi ve konu seçimi, odaklanılacak anahtar kelimeler konusunda yol gösterici olacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Suç ekonomisi
• bibliyometrik literatür analizi
• VOSviewer
• HistCite

A General Framework for Crime Economics and Bibliometric Literature Analysis

Öz

Crime economics focuses on issues directly related to basic economic problems and objectives and offers original research opportunities. It offers a wide range of research perspective, especially in terms of economic development dynamics. The similarities between previous studies in this field, the key concepts that these studies focus on, researchers focused on these subjects, the countries or institutions where the subject is studied, the links between the journals in which the studies are published, and the similarities between the sources used by the studies are important to see how the literature in the field of crime economics is shaped and what potential gaps can be captured. For this, bibliometric literature analysis identifies as a good and practical way for identifying and classifying leading journals, authors, articles, keywords, institutions, countries, co-authorship, co-citation, co-occurrence, and bibliographic matches. Because it enables current and future researchers to explore new dimensions of the analyzed research field. It also provides a broader assessment of the available resources and their intellectual structures, providing a deeper perspective on the subject under investigation, thus laying the groundwork for monitoring the flow of information and the diffusion of ideas. For this reason, the present study carried out a bibliometric analysis of the studies published in Web of Science indexed sources in the period of 1980-2021 in the field of crime economics. Findings and visualisations will guide further research on more specific fields of study, collaborations based on individuals, institutions or countries, selection of journals and topics, and keywords to focus on.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Crime economics
• Bibliometric literature analysis
• VOSviewer
• HistCite

Kaynakça

1. Alm, J., & Torgler, B. (2011). Do Ethics Matter? Tax Compliance and Morality. Journal of Business Ethics 2011 101:4, 101(4), 635–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-011-0761-9
2. Altindag, D. T. (2012). Crime and unemployment: Evidence from Europe. International Review of Law and Economics, 32(1), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IRLE.2011.10.003
3. Anderson, D. A. (2012). The Cost of Crime. Foundations and Trends in Microeconomics, 7(3), 209–265. https://doi.org/10.1561/0700000047
4. Anderson, L. R., & Stafford, S. L. (2006). Does Crime Pay? A Classroom Demonstration of Monitoring and Enforcement. Southern Economic Journal, 72(4), 1016. https://doi.org/10.2307/20111866
5. Åström, F., Danell, R., Larsen, B., & Schneider, J. (2009). Celebrating Scholarly Communication Studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th Birthday. International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, 05-S(June).
6. Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169–217. https://doi.org/10.1086/259394
7. Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J., Helbing, D., Kühnert, C., & West, G. B. (2007). Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(17), 7301–7306. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.0610172104
8. Biagi, B., & Detotto, C. (2014). Crime as Tourism Externality. Regional Studies, 48(4), 693–709. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.649005

9. Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1998). Learning from the Behavior of Others: Conformity, Fads, and Informational Cascades. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(3), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1257/JEP.12.3.151
10. Brushwood, J., Dhaliwal, D., Fairhurst, D., & Serfling, M. (2016). Property crime, earnings variability, and the cost of capital. Journal of Corporate Finance, 40, 142–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCORPFIN.2016.07.009
11. Cameron, S. (1988). The Economics of Crime Deterrence: A Survey of Theory and Evidence. Kyklos, 41(2), 301–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-6435.1988.TB02311.X
12. Chalfin, A., & McCrary, J. (2017). Criminal Deterrence: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Economic Literature, 55(1), 5–48. https://doi.org/10.1257/JEL.20141147
13. Chaloupka, F. J., Grossman, M., & Saffer, H. (2002). The effects of price on alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems. Alcohol Research & Health, 26(1), 22–34. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2002-17645-003
14. Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589
15. Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (1987). Understanding Crime Displacement: An Application of Rational Choice Theory. Criminology, 25(4), 933–948. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745- 9125.1987.tb00826.x
16. Cullen, F. T., Agnew, R., & Wilcox, P. (2014). Criminological theory : past to Present, Essential Readings (Fifth). Oxford University Press.
17. Dell, M. (2015). Trafficking Networks and the Mexican Drug War. American Economic Review, 105(6), 1738–1779. https://doi.org/10.1257/AER.20121637
18. DellaVigna, S. (2009). Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 315–372. https://doi.org/10.1257/JEL.47.2.315
19. Dietz, R. D. (2002). The estimation of neighborhood effects in the social sciences: An interdisciplinary approach. Social Science Research, 31(4), 539–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0049-089X(02)00005-4
20. Donohue, J. J., & Levitt, S. D. (2011). The Impact of Race on Policing and Arrests. The Journal of Law and Economics, 44(2), 367–394. https://doi.org/10.1086/322810
21. Ehrlich, I. (1973). Participation in Illegitimate Activities: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 521–565. https://about.jstor.org/terms
22. Evans, W. N., & Owens, E. G. (2007). COPS and crime. Journal of Public Economics, 91(1–2), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPUBECO.2006.05.014
23. Goulas, E., & Zervoyianni, A. (2015). Economic growth and crime: Is there an asymmetric relationship? Economic Modelling, 49, 286–295.
24. Hemley, D. D., & McPheters, L. R. (1975). Crime as an Externality of Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis. The American Economist, 19(1), 45–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/056943457501900108
25. Hoeffler, A. (2017). What are the costs of violence?: Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 16(4), 422–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X17714270
26. Hyman, D. N. (1999). Public Finance: A Contemporary Application of Theory To Policy (Sixth Edit). The Dryden Press.
27. Jaitman, L. (2019). Frontiers in the economics of crime: lessons for Latin America and the Caribbean. Latin American Economic Review 2019 28:1, 28(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40503-019-0081-5
28. Jonathan, O. E., Olusola, A. J., Bernadin, T. C. A., & Inoussa, T. M. (2021). Impacts of Crime on Socio-Economic Development. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 12(5), 71. https://doi.org/10.36941/mjss-2021-0045
29. Leeson, P. T. (2007). An‐arrgh‐chy: The Law and Economics of Pirate Organization. Journal of Political Economy, 115(6), 1049–1094. https://doi.org/10.1086/526403
30. Magnus, J. R., Polterovich, V. M., Danilov, D. L., & Savvateev, A. V. (2002). Tolerance of Cheating: An Analysis across Countries . The Journal of Economic Education, 33(2), 125–135. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1183390
31. McCarthy, B. (2002). New Economics of Sociological Criminology. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 417–442. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV.SOC.28.110601.140752
32. McCollister, K. E., French, M. T., & Fang, H. (2010). The Cost of Crime to Society: New Crime-Specific Estimates for Policy and Program Evaluation. Drug and alcohol dependence, 108(1–2), 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DRUGALCDEP.2009.12.002
33. Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., Houts, R., Poulton, R., Roberts, B. W., Ross, S., Sears, M. R., Thomson, W. M., & Caspi, A. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(7), 2693–2698. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.1010076108
34. Neanidis, K. C., & Papadopoulou, V. (2013). Crime, fertility, and economic growth: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 91, 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JEBO.2013.04.007
35. OECD. (2016). States of Fragility 2016: Understanding Violence. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264267213-en
36. Ostrom, V., & Ostrom, E. (1999). Public Goods and Public Choices (Polycentricity and Local Public Economies, Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis). http://johannes.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2012/02/Public-Goods-and-Public-Choices.pdf
37. Rueda, D., & Stegmueller, D. (2016). The Externalities of Inequality: Fear of Crime and Preferences for Redistribution in Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science, 60(2), 472–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12212
38. Şentürk Ulucak, Z., & Bilgili, F. (2020). Suçun İktisadi Analizi: Türkiye ve Avrupa Ülkeleri Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Sosyoekonomi, 28(46), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.17233/SOSYOEKONOMI.2020.04.16
39. Sumaila, U. R., Alder, J., & Keith, H. (2006). Global scope and economics of illegal fishing. Marine Policy, 30(6), 696–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MARPOL.2005.11.001
40. Trickett, A., Ellingworth, D., Hope, T., & Pease, K. (1995). Crime Victimization in the Eighties - Changes in Area and Regional Inequality. British Journal of Criminology, 35. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/bjcrim35&id=353&div=34&collection=journals
41. Udehn, L. (2008). The Methodology of Rational Choice. Içinde The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of the Social Sciences (ss. 143–165). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756485.ch6
42. Ulucak, R., Yücel, A. G., & Koçak, E. (2019). The Process of Sustainability: From Past to Present. Içinde B. Ozcan & İ. Ozturk (Ed.), Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) (ss. 37–53). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816797-7.00005-9
43. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 Zahra, S. A., Priem, R. L., & Rasheed, A. A. (2005). The Antecedents and Consequences of Top Management Fraud: Journal of Management, 31(6), 803–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279598
44. Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2015). Analysis and Visualization of Citation Networks: Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services. Içinde Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services (Sayı 1). Morgan & Claypool Publishers. https://doi.org/10.2200/s00624ed1v01y201501icr039